Dr. Christiano de Oliveira Santos , Ms. Amanda Ramage , Dr. Kathleen Fischer , Dr. Michael Sekula , Dr. Gustavo Santaella , Dr. William Scarfe
{"title":"滤波后反投影和迭代重建对锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像质量和处理时间的影响","authors":"Dr. Christiano de Oliveira Santos , Ms. Amanda Ramage , Dr. Kathleen Fischer , Dr. Michael Sekula , Dr. Gustavo Santaella , Dr. William Scarfe","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue−equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4 mA-14 mA], field of view [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high]) and reconstructed using FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired <em>t</em> tests. Significance was defined as <em>P</em> < .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (<em>P</em> < .001). Percentage noise reduction ranged between 41.9% (protocols at 5 mA) and 70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm / low resolution / no MAR). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Pages e88-e89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of filtered back projection and iterative reconstructions on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality and processing time\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Christiano de Oliveira Santos , Ms. Amanda Ramage , Dr. Kathleen Fischer , Dr. Michael Sekula , Dr. Gustavo Santaella , Dr. William Scarfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue−equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4 mA-14 mA], field of view [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high]) and reconstructed using FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired <em>t</em> tests. Significance was defined as <em>P</em> < .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (<em>P</em> < .001). Percentage noise reduction ranged between 41.9% (protocols at 5 mA) and 70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm / low resolution / no MAR). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\"139 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages e88-e89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of filtered back projection and iterative reconstructions on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality and processing time
Objectives
To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR).
Methods
CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue−equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4 mA-14 mA], field of view [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high]) and reconstructed using FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired t tests. Significance was defined as P < .05.
Results
The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (P < .001). Percentage noise reduction ranged between 41.9% (protocols at 5 mA) and 70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm / low resolution / no MAR). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.
Conclusions
IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.
期刊介绍:
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.