滤波后反投影和迭代重建对锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像质量和处理时间的影响

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.055
Dr. Christiano de Oliveira Santos , Ms. Amanda Ramage , Dr. Kathleen Fischer , Dr. Michael Sekula , Dr. Gustavo Santaella , Dr. William Scarfe
{"title":"滤波后反投影和迭代重建对锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像质量和处理时间的影响","authors":"Dr. Christiano de Oliveira Santos ,&nbsp;Ms. Amanda Ramage ,&nbsp;Dr. Kathleen Fischer ,&nbsp;Dr. Michael Sekula ,&nbsp;Dr. Gustavo Santaella ,&nbsp;Dr. William Scarfe","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue−equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4 mA-14 mA], field of view [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high]) and reconstructed using FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired <em>t</em> tests. Significance was defined as <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Percentage noise reduction ranged between 41.9% (protocols at 5 mA) and 70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm / low resolution / no MAR). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Pages e88-e89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of filtered back projection and iterative reconstructions on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality and processing time\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Christiano de Oliveira Santos ,&nbsp;Ms. Amanda Ramage ,&nbsp;Dr. Kathleen Fischer ,&nbsp;Dr. Michael Sekula ,&nbsp;Dr. Gustavo Santaella ,&nbsp;Dr. William Scarfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue−equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4 mA-14 mA], field of view [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high]) and reconstructed using FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired <em>t</em> tests. Significance was defined as <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Percentage noise reduction ranged between 41.9% (protocols at 5 mA) and 70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm / low resolution / no MAR). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\"139 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages e88-e89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价标准滤波反投影(FBP)和迭代重建(IR)方法对锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像噪声和处理时间(PT)的影响。方法使用Midmark EIOS单元,在不同的采集设置(毫安[4 mA-14 mA],视野[5 × 5,6 × 8,9 × 10 cm],分辨率[低,标准,高])下获得下颌第一磨牙区嵌入软组织同等材料的人下颌骨的scbct扫描,并使用FBP和IR以及有无mar进行重建。记录每次重建的处理时间。ImageJ用于分析特定轴向图像。相对于种植体位置建立径向跨轴基准线。在特定轴向水平上,在固定距离上计算颊部和舌部基准线上的灰度密度值(图像噪声)的标准差,并使用配对t检验比较FBP和IR的平均值。显著性定义为P <;. 05。结果FBP和IR的图像噪声(±SD)均值分别为198.65±55.58和99.84±16.28。与FBP相比,在所有采集参数下,IR显著降低了图像噪声(P <;措施)。降噪百分比介于41.9% (5 mA协议)和70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm /低分辨率/无MAR)之间。IR使处理时间平均增加了35.1秒。结论与标准FBP相比,sir在不增加处理时间的前提下显著降低了CBCT图像噪声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of filtered back projection and iterative reconstructions on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality and processing time

Objectives

To assess the effect of standard filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise and processing time (PT), acquired with various acquisition parameters with and without metal artifact reduction (MAR).

Methods

CBCT scans using the Midmark EIOS unit of a human mandible embedded in soft tissue−equivalent material with and without the presence of an implant at mandibular first molar region were acquired at various acquisition settings (milliamperages [4 mA-14 mA], field of view [5 × 5, 6 × 8, 9 × 10 cm], and resolutions [low, standard, high]) and reconstructed using FBP and IR, and with and without MAR. The processing time was recorded for each reconstruction. ImageJ was used to analyze specific axial images. Radial transaxial fiducial lines were created relative to the implant site. Standard deviations of the gray density values (image noise) were calculated at fixed distances on the fiducial lines on the buccal and lingual aspects at specific axial levels, and mean values for FBP and IR were compared using paired t tests. Significance was defined as P < .05.

Results

The overall mean for image noise (± SD) for FBP was 198.65 ± 55.58 and 99.84 ± 16.28 for IR. IR significantly decreased image noise compared to FBP at all acquisition parameters (P < .001). Percentage noise reduction ranged between 41.9% (protocols at 5 mA) and 70.3% (FBP / 9 × 10 cm / low resolution / no MAR). IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.

Conclusions

IR significantly reduces CBCT image noise compared to standard FBP without substantially increasing processing time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
期刊最新文献
Coronectomy for high-risk mandibular third molars: neuroprotection efficacy, long-term outcomes, and clinical controversies Temporomandibular disorder and emergency department utilization: demographic, clinical, and economic perspectives from a national database Do demographic and socioeconomic factors influence the management of nasal bone fractures? Graftless sinus lift simultaneously with dental implants placement: a prospective cohort study Prevalence and risk of oral adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective real-world cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1