颞下颌关节(TMJ)骨性结构位置和形态评价标准的推荐:系统综述

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.039
Prof. Abeer Almashraqi , Dr. Boshra Sayed , Dr. Lujain Mokli , Dr. Sarah Jaafari , Prof. Esam Halboub , Prof. Maged Alhammadi
{"title":"颞下颌关节(TMJ)骨性结构位置和形态评价标准的推荐:系统综述","authors":"Prof. Abeer Almashraqi ,&nbsp;Dr. Boshra Sayed ,&nbsp;Dr. Lujain Mokli ,&nbsp;Dr. Sarah Jaafari ,&nbsp;Prof. Esam Halboub ,&nbsp;Prof. Maged Alhammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to appraise the reliability and comprehensiveness of imaging methods in articles that used three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which used either computed tomography (CT) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in order to propose a standardized imaging method.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Six databases/search engines were searched up until September 2022. The outcomes of interest included measurements of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, joint spaces, or the entire TMJ. Two checklists were used: one to assess the risk of bias, with a maximum score of 37, and the other, a predesigned checklist consisting of 22 items to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the methods used, with a maximum score of 33.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 2567 articles retrieved, only 14 studies (which used CBCT) were deemed eligible and thus included in the qualitative analysis. Three studies were deemed of low risk of bias (with scores of 29/37 in two studies and 28/37 in one study), while the remaining studies were rated as high to moderate quality, primarily due to improper reporting of inter-observer agreement, varying reliability values, and a limited number of cases included in the reliability analysis. Regarding the comprehensiveness of the methods used, only 4 studies achieved relatively high scores (26/33 in three studies and 24/33 in one study). The deficiencies observed were related to the reporting of variables such as slice thickness and voxel size, absence of or improper reporting of intra- and inter-examiner reliability analyses, and failure to assess all osseous components of the TMJ.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CBCT-based methods used to assess the positions and morphology of TMJ bony structures appear to be imperfect and lacking in comprehensiveness. Hence, criteria for a standardized assessment method of these TMJ structures are proposed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Page e82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for standard criteria for the positional and morphological evaluation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osseous structures: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Prof. Abeer Almashraqi ,&nbsp;Dr. Boshra Sayed ,&nbsp;Dr. Lujain Mokli ,&nbsp;Dr. Sarah Jaafari ,&nbsp;Prof. Esam Halboub ,&nbsp;Prof. Maged Alhammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to appraise the reliability and comprehensiveness of imaging methods in articles that used three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which used either computed tomography (CT) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in order to propose a standardized imaging method.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Six databases/search engines were searched up until September 2022. The outcomes of interest included measurements of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, joint spaces, or the entire TMJ. Two checklists were used: one to assess the risk of bias, with a maximum score of 37, and the other, a predesigned checklist consisting of 22 items to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the methods used, with a maximum score of 33.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 2567 articles retrieved, only 14 studies (which used CBCT) were deemed eligible and thus included in the qualitative analysis. Three studies were deemed of low risk of bias (with scores of 29/37 in two studies and 28/37 in one study), while the remaining studies were rated as high to moderate quality, primarily due to improper reporting of inter-observer agreement, varying reliability values, and a limited number of cases included in the reliability analysis. Regarding the comprehensiveness of the methods used, only 4 studies achieved relatively high scores (26/33 in three studies and 24/33 in one study). The deficiencies observed were related to the reporting of variables such as slice thickness and voxel size, absence of or improper reporting of intra- and inter-examiner reliability analyses, and failure to assess all osseous components of the TMJ.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CBCT-based methods used to assess the positions and morphology of TMJ bony structures appear to be imperfect and lacking in comprehensiveness. Hence, criteria for a standardized assessment method of these TMJ structures are proposed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\"139 3\",\"pages\":\"Page e82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统综述旨在评价颞下颌关节(TMJ)三维成像方法的可靠性和全面性,包括计算机断层扫描(CT)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),以提出一种标准化的成像方法。研究设计6个数据库/搜索引擎被搜索到2022年9月。结果包括测量下颌髁、盂窝、关节间隙或整个TMJ。使用了两个检查表:一个用于评估偏倚风险,最高得分为37分;另一个是预先设计的检查表,包括22个项目,用于评估所用方法的全面性,最高得分为33分。在检索到的2567篇文章中,只有14篇研究(使用CBCT)被认为符合条件,因此被纳入定性分析。3项研究被认为是低偏倚风险(两项研究的评分为29/37,一项研究的评分为28/37),而其余研究被评为高至中等质量,主要原因是对观察者间一致性的报告不当,信度值不同,以及纳入信度分析的病例数量有限。在方法的综合性方面,只有4项研究获得了较高的分数(3项研究26/33,1项研究24/33)。观察到的缺陷与诸如切片厚度和体素大小等变量的报告有关,缺乏或不正确地报告内部和审查员之间的可靠性分析,以及未能评估TMJ的所有骨性成分。结论基于cbct的颞下颌关节骨结构位置和形态评估方法尚不完善,且不够全面。因此,提出了TMJ结构标准化评估方法的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations for standard criteria for the positional and morphological evaluation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osseous structures: a systematic review

Objective

This systematic review aimed to appraise the reliability and comprehensiveness of imaging methods in articles that used three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), which used either computed tomography (CT) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in order to propose a standardized imaging method.

Study Design

Six databases/search engines were searched up until September 2022. The outcomes of interest included measurements of the mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, joint spaces, or the entire TMJ. Two checklists were used: one to assess the risk of bias, with a maximum score of 37, and the other, a predesigned checklist consisting of 22 items to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the methods used, with a maximum score of 33.

Results

Of the 2567 articles retrieved, only 14 studies (which used CBCT) were deemed eligible and thus included in the qualitative analysis. Three studies were deemed of low risk of bias (with scores of 29/37 in two studies and 28/37 in one study), while the remaining studies were rated as high to moderate quality, primarily due to improper reporting of inter-observer agreement, varying reliability values, and a limited number of cases included in the reliability analysis. Regarding the comprehensiveness of the methods used, only 4 studies achieved relatively high scores (26/33 in three studies and 24/33 in one study). The deficiencies observed were related to the reporting of variables such as slice thickness and voxel size, absence of or improper reporting of intra- and inter-examiner reliability analyses, and failure to assess all osseous components of the TMJ.

Conclusion

CBCT-based methods used to assess the positions and morphology of TMJ bony structures appear to be imperfect and lacking in comprehensiveness. Hence, criteria for a standardized assessment method of these TMJ structures are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a 10-year cohort study Contemporary strategies for active learning in oral and maxillofacial surgery education Effectiveness of computer-guided versus conventional arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review of clinical studies Evaluation of bone repair using sticky bone in preradiotherapy extraction sockets of head and neck cancer patients: a pre- and postradiotherapy follow-up Treatment planning software to protect dental structure, salivary glands, and nontarget tissue in head and neck cancer patients: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1