基于高光谱成像的收获前番茄果实质量监测机器学习模型

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109788
Eitan Fass , Eldar Shlomi , Carmit Ziv , Oren Glickman , David Helman
{"title":"基于高光谱成像的收获前番茄果实质量监测机器学习模型","authors":"Eitan Fass ,&nbsp;Eldar Shlomi ,&nbsp;Carmit Ziv ,&nbsp;Oren Glickman ,&nbsp;David Helman","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional methods for assessing tomato quality are time-consuming, expensive, and limited in scope. Here we developed a non-destructive spectral-based model using a handheld hyperspectral camera with 204 bands at the 400–1000 nm range, focusing on data reduction, paving the way for an economically viable device designed to assess seven key tomato quality parameters. We collected 567 fruits from five cultivars of various types and analyzed them for weight, firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), citric acid, ascorbic acid, lycopene, and pH after taking hyperspectral images of the fruits. Five commonly used spectral indices, thousands of normalized difference spectral index (NDSI) combinations, a multivariable regression model (MVR), and three machine learning (ML) algorithms (random forest – RF, extreme gradient boosting – XGBoost, and artificial neural network – ANN) were employed to predict the quality parameters from as few bands as possible. Results show that the ML models with bands selected via a hotspot overlapping method significantly improved quality prediction compared to the common spectral index approaches. Among ML algorithms, RF stood out with the best results with R<sup>2</sup> of 0.94 for weight, 0.89 for firmness, 0.79 for lycopene, 0.72 for TSS, 0.67 for pH, 0.62 for citric acid, and 0.45 for ascorbic acid, with the only exception of ANN, which was slightly better for weight and lycopene (R<sup>2</sup> of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively). Overall, models with only five bands were enough to predict all seven quality parameters with comparable performance to models with a larger number of bands. Our study offers an efficient and cost-effective method for assessing pre-harvest tomato quality, benefiting farmers and the food industry, as well as scientific research on fruit development and nutrition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 109788"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models based on hyperspectral imaging for pre-harvest tomato fruit quality monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Eitan Fass ,&nbsp;Eldar Shlomi ,&nbsp;Carmit Ziv ,&nbsp;Oren Glickman ,&nbsp;David Helman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traditional methods for assessing tomato quality are time-consuming, expensive, and limited in scope. Here we developed a non-destructive spectral-based model using a handheld hyperspectral camera with 204 bands at the 400–1000 nm range, focusing on data reduction, paving the way for an economically viable device designed to assess seven key tomato quality parameters. We collected 567 fruits from five cultivars of various types and analyzed them for weight, firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), citric acid, ascorbic acid, lycopene, and pH after taking hyperspectral images of the fruits. Five commonly used spectral indices, thousands of normalized difference spectral index (NDSI) combinations, a multivariable regression model (MVR), and three machine learning (ML) algorithms (random forest – RF, extreme gradient boosting – XGBoost, and artificial neural network – ANN) were employed to predict the quality parameters from as few bands as possible. Results show that the ML models with bands selected via a hotspot overlapping method significantly improved quality prediction compared to the common spectral index approaches. Among ML algorithms, RF stood out with the best results with R<sup>2</sup> of 0.94 for weight, 0.89 for firmness, 0.79 for lycopene, 0.72 for TSS, 0.67 for pH, 0.62 for citric acid, and 0.45 for ascorbic acid, with the only exception of ANN, which was slightly better for weight and lycopene (R<sup>2</sup> of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively). Overall, models with only five bands were enough to predict all seven quality parameters with comparable performance to models with a larger number of bands. Our study offers an efficient and cost-effective method for assessing pre-harvest tomato quality, benefiting farmers and the food industry, as well as scientific research on fruit development and nutrition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924011797\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924011797","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的番茄品质评估方法耗时、昂贵且范围有限。在这里,我们开发了一种基于非破坏性光谱的模型,使用手持高光谱相机,在400-1000纳米范围内具有204个波段,重点是数据减少,为设计一种经济可行的设备来评估七个关键的番茄质量参数铺平了道路。采集了5个不同品种的567个果实,通过对果实进行高光谱成像,分析了果实的重量、硬度、总可溶性固形物(TSS)、柠檬酸、抗坏血酸、番茄红素和pH值。采用五种常用的光谱指数、数千种归一化差分光谱指数(NDSI)组合、一种多变量回归模型(MVR)和三种机器学习(ML)算法(随机森林- RF、极端梯度增强- XGBoost和人工神经网络- ANN)在尽可能少的波段上预测质量参数。结果表明,与常用的光谱指数方法相比,通过热点重叠方法选择波段的ML模型显著提高了预测质量。在ML算法中,RF算法的结果最好,其对重量的R2为0.94,对硬度的R2为0.89,对番茄红素的R2为0.79,对TSS的R2为0.72,对pH的R2为0.67,对柠檬酸的R2为0.62,对抗坏血酸的R2为0.45,唯一例外是ANN算法,其对重量和番茄红素的R2略好(分别为0.95和0.85)。总体而言,只有5个波段的模型足以预测所有7个质量参数,其性能与具有更多波段的模型相当。本研究为收获前番茄品质评估提供了一种高效、经济的方法,有利于农民和食品工业,也有利于果实发育和营养的科学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning models based on hyperspectral imaging for pre-harvest tomato fruit quality monitoring
Traditional methods for assessing tomato quality are time-consuming, expensive, and limited in scope. Here we developed a non-destructive spectral-based model using a handheld hyperspectral camera with 204 bands at the 400–1000 nm range, focusing on data reduction, paving the way for an economically viable device designed to assess seven key tomato quality parameters. We collected 567 fruits from five cultivars of various types and analyzed them for weight, firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), citric acid, ascorbic acid, lycopene, and pH after taking hyperspectral images of the fruits. Five commonly used spectral indices, thousands of normalized difference spectral index (NDSI) combinations, a multivariable regression model (MVR), and three machine learning (ML) algorithms (random forest – RF, extreme gradient boosting – XGBoost, and artificial neural network – ANN) were employed to predict the quality parameters from as few bands as possible. Results show that the ML models with bands selected via a hotspot overlapping method significantly improved quality prediction compared to the common spectral index approaches. Among ML algorithms, RF stood out with the best results with R2 of 0.94 for weight, 0.89 for firmness, 0.79 for lycopene, 0.72 for TSS, 0.67 for pH, 0.62 for citric acid, and 0.45 for ascorbic acid, with the only exception of ANN, which was slightly better for weight and lycopene (R2 of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively). Overall, models with only five bands were enough to predict all seven quality parameters with comparable performance to models with a larger number of bands. Our study offers an efficient and cost-effective method for assessing pre-harvest tomato quality, benefiting farmers and the food industry, as well as scientific research on fruit development and nutrition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Clustering in mixed broiler chicken batches for improvement of daily average weight FENE: Fish-conditioned Expert Network using deep learning for multi-species marine distribution modeling Multi-grouser interference effect and tractive performance of crawlers in wet-soft paddy soil based on DEM-MBD coupling Wintertime pollutant forecasting in northern sheep houses via a physics-constrained, multi-modal deep hybrid model An end-to-end video-based action recognition pipeline for precision monitoring and success scoring of broiler breeder mating behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1