浮式海上风力发电机的水动力响应建模-比较研究

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, OCEAN Applied Ocean Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2025.104441
Shimin Yu , Edward Ransley , Ling Qian , Yang Zhou , Scott Brown , Deborah Greaves , Martyn Hann , Anna Holcombe , Emma Edwards , Tom Tosdevin , Sudhir Jagdale , Qian Li , Yi Zhang , Ningbo Zhang , Shiqiang Yan , Qingwei Ma , Bonaventura Tagliafierro , Salvatore Capasso , Iván Martínez-Estévez , Malin Göteman , Javier L. Lara
{"title":"浮式海上风力发电机的水动力响应建模-比较研究","authors":"Shimin Yu ,&nbsp;Edward Ransley ,&nbsp;Ling Qian ,&nbsp;Yang Zhou ,&nbsp;Scott Brown ,&nbsp;Deborah Greaves ,&nbsp;Martyn Hann ,&nbsp;Anna Holcombe ,&nbsp;Emma Edwards ,&nbsp;Tom Tosdevin ,&nbsp;Sudhir Jagdale ,&nbsp;Qian Li ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Ningbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Shiqiang Yan ,&nbsp;Qingwei Ma ,&nbsp;Bonaventura Tagliafierro ,&nbsp;Salvatore Capasso ,&nbsp;Iván Martínez-Estévez ,&nbsp;Malin Göteman ,&nbsp;Javier L. Lara","doi":"10.1016/j.apor.2025.104441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper summarises the work conducted within the 1st FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine) Comparative Study organised by the EPSRC (UK) ‘Extreme loading on FOWTs under complex environmental conditions’ and ‘Collaborative computational project on wave structure interaction (CCP-WSI)’ projects. The hydrodynamic response of a FOWT support structure is simulated with a range of numerical models based on potential theory, Morison equation, Navier-Stokes solvers and hybrid methods coupling different flow solvers. A series of load cases including the static equilibrium tests, free decay tests, operational and extreme focused wave cases are considered for the UMaine VolturnUS-S semi-submersible platform, and the results from 17 contributions are analysed and compared with each other and against the experimental data from a 1:70 scale model test performed in the COAST Laboratory Ocean Basin at the University of Plymouth. It is shown that most numerical models can predict similar results for the heave response, but significant discrepancies exist in the prediction of the surge and pitch responses as well as the mooring line loads. For the extreme focused wave case, while both Navier–Stokes and potential flow base models tend to produce larger errors in terms of the root mean squared error than the operational focused wave case, the Navier-Stokes based models generally perform better. Given the fact that variations in the solutions (sometimes large) also present in the results based the same or similar numerical models, e.g., OpenFOAM, the study highlights uncertainties in setting up a numerical model for complex wave structure interaction simulations such as those involving a FOWT and therefore the importance of proper code validation and verification studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8261,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ocean Research","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104441"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the hydrodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine – a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Shimin Yu ,&nbsp;Edward Ransley ,&nbsp;Ling Qian ,&nbsp;Yang Zhou ,&nbsp;Scott Brown ,&nbsp;Deborah Greaves ,&nbsp;Martyn Hann ,&nbsp;Anna Holcombe ,&nbsp;Emma Edwards ,&nbsp;Tom Tosdevin ,&nbsp;Sudhir Jagdale ,&nbsp;Qian Li ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Ningbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Shiqiang Yan ,&nbsp;Qingwei Ma ,&nbsp;Bonaventura Tagliafierro ,&nbsp;Salvatore Capasso ,&nbsp;Iván Martínez-Estévez ,&nbsp;Malin Göteman ,&nbsp;Javier L. Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apor.2025.104441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper summarises the work conducted within the 1st FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine) Comparative Study organised by the EPSRC (UK) ‘Extreme loading on FOWTs under complex environmental conditions’ and ‘Collaborative computational project on wave structure interaction (CCP-WSI)’ projects. The hydrodynamic response of a FOWT support structure is simulated with a range of numerical models based on potential theory, Morison equation, Navier-Stokes solvers and hybrid methods coupling different flow solvers. A series of load cases including the static equilibrium tests, free decay tests, operational and extreme focused wave cases are considered for the UMaine VolturnUS-S semi-submersible platform, and the results from 17 contributions are analysed and compared with each other and against the experimental data from a 1:70 scale model test performed in the COAST Laboratory Ocean Basin at the University of Plymouth. It is shown that most numerical models can predict similar results for the heave response, but significant discrepancies exist in the prediction of the surge and pitch responses as well as the mooring line loads. For the extreme focused wave case, while both Navier–Stokes and potential flow base models tend to produce larger errors in terms of the root mean squared error than the operational focused wave case, the Navier-Stokes based models generally perform better. Given the fact that variations in the solutions (sometimes large) also present in the results based the same or similar numerical models, e.g., OpenFOAM, the study highlights uncertainties in setting up a numerical model for complex wave structure interaction simulations such as those involving a FOWT and therefore the importance of proper code validation and verification studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ocean Research\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ocean Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014111872500029X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, OCEAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ocean Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014111872500029X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文总结了由EPSRC(英国)组织的“复杂环境条件下FOWT的极端载荷”和“波浪结构相互作用协同计算项目(CCP-WSI)”项目的第一次FOWT(浮式海上风力涡轮机)比较研究中所进行的工作。采用基于位势理论、Morison方程、Navier-Stokes求解法和不同流场求解法耦合的混合方法,对FOWT支撑结构的水动力响应进行了数值模拟。对UMaine VolturnUS-S半潜式平台进行了静力平衡试验、自由衰减试验、操作和极端聚焦波试验等一系列载荷工况,并对17个贡献的结果进行了分析和比较,并与普利茅斯大学COAST实验室海洋盆地1:70比例模型试验的实验数据进行了比较。结果表明,大多数数值模型对船舶的升沉响应的预测结果相似,但对船舶的纵摇响应和纵摇响应以及系缆载荷的预测结果存在显著差异。对于极端聚焦波情况,虽然Navier-Stokes和势流基础模型在均方根误差方面都比实际聚焦波情况产生更大的误差,但基于Navier-Stokes的模型通常表现更好。考虑到基于相同或类似数值模型(如OpenFOAM)的结果中也存在解决方案的变化(有时很大),该研究强调了为复杂波浪结构相互作用模拟(如涉及FOWT的数值模型)建立数值模型时的不确定性,因此强调了适当的代码验证和验证研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling the hydrodynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine – a comparative study
This paper summarises the work conducted within the 1st FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine) Comparative Study organised by the EPSRC (UK) ‘Extreme loading on FOWTs under complex environmental conditions’ and ‘Collaborative computational project on wave structure interaction (CCP-WSI)’ projects. The hydrodynamic response of a FOWT support structure is simulated with a range of numerical models based on potential theory, Morison equation, Navier-Stokes solvers and hybrid methods coupling different flow solvers. A series of load cases including the static equilibrium tests, free decay tests, operational and extreme focused wave cases are considered for the UMaine VolturnUS-S semi-submersible platform, and the results from 17 contributions are analysed and compared with each other and against the experimental data from a 1:70 scale model test performed in the COAST Laboratory Ocean Basin at the University of Plymouth. It is shown that most numerical models can predict similar results for the heave response, but significant discrepancies exist in the prediction of the surge and pitch responses as well as the mooring line loads. For the extreme focused wave case, while both Navier–Stokes and potential flow base models tend to produce larger errors in terms of the root mean squared error than the operational focused wave case, the Navier-Stokes based models generally perform better. Given the fact that variations in the solutions (sometimes large) also present in the results based the same or similar numerical models, e.g., OpenFOAM, the study highlights uncertainties in setting up a numerical model for complex wave structure interaction simulations such as those involving a FOWT and therefore the importance of proper code validation and verification studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ocean Research
Applied Ocean Research 地学-工程:大洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.00%
发文量
316
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Applied Ocean Research is to encourage the submission of papers that advance the state of knowledge in a range of topics relevant to ocean engineering.
期刊最新文献
Collapse behavior of egg-shaped external pressure vessels with sandwich structure Dynamic programming-based range-depth estimation of sperm whale echolocation clicks using a two-element array The variation of the rheological properties of coastal mud after being subjected to prior shear loadings Deep learning-enhanced simulation-based inference for improving digital twins of marine vessels Empirical models for estimating small-strain dynamic properties of marine calcareous sand–silt mixtures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1