循环流化床系统中煤-生物质-氨共烧燃料柔韧性的燃烧特性

IF 5.8 2区 生物学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Biomass & Bioenergy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107666
Seong-Ju Kim , Sung-Jin Pak , Sung-Ho Jo , Ho-Tae Im , Hookyung Lee , Sang-Jun Yoon , Ho-Won Ra , Sung-Min Yoon , Dongfang Li , Tae-Young Mun
{"title":"循环流化床系统中煤-生物质-氨共烧燃料柔韧性的燃烧特性","authors":"Seong-Ju Kim ,&nbsp;Sung-Jin Pak ,&nbsp;Sung-Ho Jo ,&nbsp;Ho-Tae Im ,&nbsp;Hookyung Lee ,&nbsp;Sang-Jun Yoon ,&nbsp;Ho-Won Ra ,&nbsp;Sung-Min Yoon ,&nbsp;Dongfang Li ,&nbsp;Tae-Young Mun","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomass and ammonia are promising resources for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from coal-fired power plants. Some of these plants are co-firing biomass with coal. This study examines coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing in a circulating fluidized bed system, focusing on temperature and pressure profiles in the combustor, pollutant emissions, and combustion efficiencies. GHG emissions, specifically CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, were compared based on biomass ratio (8 % lower and 23 % higher) and the ammonia supply position in the dense bed zone (DBZ) and wind box (WB). When ammonia was supplied to the DBZ at a lower biomass co-firing ratio, CO emissions increased to 213.4 ppm due to the competition between coal and ammonia combustion. In contrast, ammonia supplied to the WB at a higher biomass ratio (22–23 % as a thermal base) resulted in the lowest CO emissions at 6.6 ppm, reducing heat losses. The N<sub>2</sub>O concentration from higher biomass co-firing with NH<sub>3</sub> and coal when injected at WB was lower than that from a lower biomass ratio (8 % as a thermal base). This study highlights the potential of coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing to reduce GHG emissions while maintaining combustion efficiency, with minimal CO impact, offering a sustainable solution for bioenergy generation in coal-fired power plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107666"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combustion characteristics of fuel flexibility with coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing in a circulating fluidized bed system\",\"authors\":\"Seong-Ju Kim ,&nbsp;Sung-Jin Pak ,&nbsp;Sung-Ho Jo ,&nbsp;Ho-Tae Im ,&nbsp;Hookyung Lee ,&nbsp;Sang-Jun Yoon ,&nbsp;Ho-Won Ra ,&nbsp;Sung-Min Yoon ,&nbsp;Dongfang Li ,&nbsp;Tae-Young Mun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biomass and ammonia are promising resources for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from coal-fired power plants. Some of these plants are co-firing biomass with coal. This study examines coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing in a circulating fluidized bed system, focusing on temperature and pressure profiles in the combustor, pollutant emissions, and combustion efficiencies. GHG emissions, specifically CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, were compared based on biomass ratio (8 % lower and 23 % higher) and the ammonia supply position in the dense bed zone (DBZ) and wind box (WB). When ammonia was supplied to the DBZ at a lower biomass co-firing ratio, CO emissions increased to 213.4 ppm due to the competition between coal and ammonia combustion. In contrast, ammonia supplied to the WB at a higher biomass ratio (22–23 % as a thermal base) resulted in the lowest CO emissions at 6.6 ppm, reducing heat losses. The N<sub>2</sub>O concentration from higher biomass co-firing with NH<sub>3</sub> and coal when injected at WB was lower than that from a lower biomass ratio (8 % as a thermal base). This study highlights the potential of coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing to reduce GHG emissions while maintaining combustion efficiency, with minimal CO impact, offering a sustainable solution for bioenergy generation in coal-fired power plants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425000777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425000777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物质和氨是减少燃煤电厂温室气体(GHG)排放的有希望的资源。其中一些工厂将生物质与煤共烧。本研究考察了煤-生物质-氨在循环流化床系统中的共燃烧,重点关注燃烧室的温度和压力分布、污染物排放和燃烧效率。基于生物量比(低8%和高23%)、密床区(DBZ)和风箱区(WB)的氨供应位置,比较了温室气体排放,特别是CO2和N2O。当以较低的生物质共烧比向DBZ供应氨时,由于煤和氨燃烧的竞争,CO排放量增加到213.4 ppm。相比之下,以较高的生物质比(22 - 23%作为热基)供应给WB的氨导致的CO排放量最低,为6.6 ppm,减少了热损失。在WB注入时,高生物质与NH3和煤共烧产生的N2O浓度低于低生物质比(热基为8%)产生的N2O浓度。本研究强调了煤-生物质-氨共烧在保持燃烧效率的同时减少温室气体排放的潜力,并以最小的CO影响,为燃煤电厂的生物能源发电提供了可持续的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combustion characteristics of fuel flexibility with coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing in a circulating fluidized bed system
Biomass and ammonia are promising resources for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from coal-fired power plants. Some of these plants are co-firing biomass with coal. This study examines coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing in a circulating fluidized bed system, focusing on temperature and pressure profiles in the combustor, pollutant emissions, and combustion efficiencies. GHG emissions, specifically CO2 and N2O, were compared based on biomass ratio (8 % lower and 23 % higher) and the ammonia supply position in the dense bed zone (DBZ) and wind box (WB). When ammonia was supplied to the DBZ at a lower biomass co-firing ratio, CO emissions increased to 213.4 ppm due to the competition between coal and ammonia combustion. In contrast, ammonia supplied to the WB at a higher biomass ratio (22–23 % as a thermal base) resulted in the lowest CO emissions at 6.6 ppm, reducing heat losses. The N2O concentration from higher biomass co-firing with NH3 and coal when injected at WB was lower than that from a lower biomass ratio (8 % as a thermal base). This study highlights the potential of coal–biomass–ammonia co-firing to reduce GHG emissions while maintaining combustion efficiency, with minimal CO impact, offering a sustainable solution for bioenergy generation in coal-fired power plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomass & Bioenergy
Biomass & Bioenergy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy. Key areas covered by the journal: • Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation. • Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal. • Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes • Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation • Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
期刊最新文献
TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB): influence of ozonation and alkali-extraction of EFB on structures and properties of oxidized products and nanofibrils Lignins obtained from invasive tree species for the production of polymer composites Next-gen pre-treatment strategies for lignocellulose in biohydrogen production via dark fermentation: A review Recent advances in biochar-integrated microbial fuel cells for energy recovery and environmental remediation Production, modification and application of biochar in iron and steel metallurgy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1