平衡经济、用户保障和碳排放,实现可持续天然气管网规划

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2025.110858
Bingyuan Hong , Wei Gao , Ming Yang , Bin Zhou , Yangfan Lu , Jing Gong , Kai Wen
{"title":"平衡经济、用户保障和碳排放,实现可持续天然气管网规划","authors":"Bingyuan Hong ,&nbsp;Wei Gao ,&nbsp;Ming Yang ,&nbsp;Bin Zhou ,&nbsp;Yangfan Lu ,&nbsp;Jing Gong ,&nbsp;Kai Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.110858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural gas pipeline network is an indispensable public infrastructure, and its reasonable construction is of great importance to national energy security. Natural gas pipeline network planning not only involves huge investment, but also affects environmental protection. Most importantly, it is also related to the guarantee of gas consumption of downstream social users. At present, the trade-off between economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions is not clear. In order to find a more environmentally friendly natural gas pipeline planning, this paper proposed a natural gas pipeline network planning method that comprehensively considers economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions to minimize the total cost of pipeline construction and operation, improve the gas guarantee of users and reduce carbon emissions. Taking the actual pipeline network in a certain area as an example, the trade-off between economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions in pipeline network planning is investigated by comparing the traditional single economic objective scenario with six multi-objective scenarios. Results show that considering all three factors can cut emissions by 89 % compared to focusing solely on economic goals, with user guarantee also improving. When prioritizing economic efficiency in a multi-objective scenario, costs decrease by 12.2 %–13.6 % compared to other scenarios, though user guarantee and emission reductions are lower. These findings highlight the inherent trade-offs among economy, user assurance, and emissions, with different priorities leading to varying outcomes. This research offers a method to achieve multi-objective planning, allowing for tailored solutions based on planners’ preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 110858"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing economy, user guarantee, and carbon emissions towards sustainable natural gas pipeline network planning\",\"authors\":\"Bingyuan Hong ,&nbsp;Wei Gao ,&nbsp;Ming Yang ,&nbsp;Bin Zhou ,&nbsp;Yangfan Lu ,&nbsp;Jing Gong ,&nbsp;Kai Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2025.110858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Natural gas pipeline network is an indispensable public infrastructure, and its reasonable construction is of great importance to national energy security. Natural gas pipeline network planning not only involves huge investment, but also affects environmental protection. Most importantly, it is also related to the guarantee of gas consumption of downstream social users. At present, the trade-off between economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions is not clear. In order to find a more environmentally friendly natural gas pipeline planning, this paper proposed a natural gas pipeline network planning method that comprehensively considers economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions to minimize the total cost of pipeline construction and operation, improve the gas guarantee of users and reduce carbon emissions. Taking the actual pipeline network in a certain area as an example, the trade-off between economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions in pipeline network planning is investigated by comparing the traditional single economic objective scenario with six multi-objective scenarios. Results show that considering all three factors can cut emissions by 89 % compared to focusing solely on economic goals, with user guarantee also improving. When prioritizing economic efficiency in a multi-objective scenario, costs decrease by 12.2 %–13.6 % compared to other scenarios, though user guarantee and emission reductions are lower. These findings highlight the inherent trade-offs among economy, user assurance, and emissions, with different priorities leading to varying outcomes. This research offers a method to achieve multi-objective planning, allowing for tailored solutions based on planners’ preferences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225000038\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225000038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然气管网是必不可少的公共基础设施,其合理建设对国家能源安全具有重要意义。天然气管网规划不仅投资巨大,而且影响环境保护。最重要的是,这也关系到下游社会用户用气的保障。目前,经济、用户保障和碳排放之间的权衡并不明确。为了寻找更加环保的天然气管道规划,本文提出了一种综合考虑经济性、用户保障和碳排放的天然气管网规划方法,最大限度地降低管道建设和运营的总成本,提高用户用气保障,减少碳排放。以某地区实际管网为例,通过对传统单一经济目标情景与6种多目标情景的比较,研究管网规划中经济性、用户保障与碳排放之间的权衡关系。结果表明,与仅关注经济目标相比,考虑这三个因素可以减少89%的排放,并且用户保障也有所改善。当在多目标情景中优先考虑经济效率时,尽管用户保障和减排较低,但与其他情景相比,成本降低了12.2% - 13.6%。这些发现强调了经济、用户保障和排放之间的内在权衡,不同的优先级导致不同的结果。本研究提供了一种实现多目标规划的方法,允许根据规划者的偏好定制解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing economy, user guarantee, and carbon emissions towards sustainable natural gas pipeline network planning
Natural gas pipeline network is an indispensable public infrastructure, and its reasonable construction is of great importance to national energy security. Natural gas pipeline network planning not only involves huge investment, but also affects environmental protection. Most importantly, it is also related to the guarantee of gas consumption of downstream social users. At present, the trade-off between economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions is not clear. In order to find a more environmentally friendly natural gas pipeline planning, this paper proposed a natural gas pipeline network planning method that comprehensively considers economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions to minimize the total cost of pipeline construction and operation, improve the gas guarantee of users and reduce carbon emissions. Taking the actual pipeline network in a certain area as an example, the trade-off between economy, user guarantee and carbon emissions in pipeline network planning is investigated by comparing the traditional single economic objective scenario with six multi-objective scenarios. Results show that considering all three factors can cut emissions by 89 % compared to focusing solely on economic goals, with user guarantee also improving. When prioritizing economic efficiency in a multi-objective scenario, costs decrease by 12.2 %–13.6 % compared to other scenarios, though user guarantee and emission reductions are lower. These findings highlight the inherent trade-offs among economy, user assurance, and emissions, with different priorities leading to varying outcomes. This research offers a method to achieve multi-objective planning, allowing for tailored solutions based on planners’ preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
A two-stage stochastic optimization approach for supply storage and allocation with fairness in humanitarian relief A hybrid algorithm for the inter-terminal transport vehicle routing problem with heterogeneous fleet Control meets resilience: Data-enhanced Model Predictive Control for supply chain recovery Optimization models for medical waste management: Before and during COVID-19 pandemic BuildCES: A conceptual BIM–Blockchain–AI framework for transparent and predictive construction management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1