认知理性具有遗传性,属于一般认知能力范畴

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101895
Timothy C. Bates
{"title":"认知理性具有遗传性,属于一般认知能力范畴","authors":"Timothy C. Bates","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intelligence and rationality both predict optimal decision making. However, whether cognitive rationality (CR) and general cognitive ability (CA) are identical or reflect fundamentally distinct processes is hotly debated. Here, we report a twin study aimed at distinguishing the cognitive mechanisms involved in CR and CA. CR and CA tests were administered to a large twin sample. Univariate analyses indicated that both CA and CR were strongly heritable. Multivariate modelling of CA scales and CR indicated that CR was accounted for by a latent <em>g</em>-factor, which itself was strongly heritable. We conclude that CR is not a distinct disposition from CA, but instead that the reflexive and reflective aspects of cognitive ability make making CR a robust and efficient test of general cognitive ability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive rationality is heritable and lies under general cognitive ability\",\"authors\":\"Timothy C. Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intelligence and rationality both predict optimal decision making. However, whether cognitive rationality (CR) and general cognitive ability (CA) are identical or reflect fundamentally distinct processes is hotly debated. Here, we report a twin study aimed at distinguishing the cognitive mechanisms involved in CR and CA. CR and CA tests were administered to a large twin sample. Univariate analyses indicated that both CA and CR were strongly heritable. Multivariate modelling of CA scales and CR indicated that CR was accounted for by a latent <em>g</em>-factor, which itself was strongly heritable. We conclude that CR is not a distinct disposition from CA, but instead that the reflexive and reflective aspects of cognitive ability make making CR a robust and efficient test of general cognitive ability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000898\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智力和理性都能预测最佳决策。然而,认知理性(CR)和一般认知能力(CA)是相同的还是反映了根本不同的过程,这一问题一直争论不休。在这里,我们报告了一项双胞胎研究,旨在区分CR和CA涉及的认知机制。CR和CA测试是对一个大的双胞胎样本进行的。单因素分析表明,CA和CR均具有较强的遗传性。CA量表和CR的多变量模型表明,CR是由一个潜在的g因子引起的,该因子本身具有很强的遗传性。我们的结论是,认知能力测验与认知能力测验并不是一种截然不同的倾向,相反,认知能力的反身性和反思性方面使认知能力测验成为一种稳健有效的一般认知能力测验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive rationality is heritable and lies under general cognitive ability
Intelligence and rationality both predict optimal decision making. However, whether cognitive rationality (CR) and general cognitive ability (CA) are identical or reflect fundamentally distinct processes is hotly debated. Here, we report a twin study aimed at distinguishing the cognitive mechanisms involved in CR and CA. CR and CA tests were administered to a large twin sample. Univariate analyses indicated that both CA and CR were strongly heritable. Multivariate modelling of CA scales and CR indicated that CR was accounted for by a latent g-factor, which itself was strongly heritable. We conclude that CR is not a distinct disposition from CA, but instead that the reflexive and reflective aspects of cognitive ability make making CR a robust and efficient test of general cognitive ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the dimensions of deployment of intelligence: Development and validation of transformational giftedness scale Assessing working memory test performance with a cognitive psychometric race model A meMO-II analysis of intelligence and emotion regulation in the association between sensory processing sensitivity and depressive symptoms in adolescents Developing BOLT — A matrix test using Boolean operations to assess logical thinking Comparative analysis of anatomical modularity across structural brain network models: A cognitive study in gifted children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1