通过基于模型的方法实现产品复杂性管理

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110776
Zhenchao Hu , Jinwei Chen , Yuanfu Li , Jinzhi Lu , Huisheng Zhang , Dimitris Kiritsis
{"title":"通过基于模型的方法实现产品复杂性管理","authors":"Zhenchao Hu ,&nbsp;Jinwei Chen ,&nbsp;Yuanfu Li ,&nbsp;Jinzhi Lu ,&nbsp;Huisheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Dimitris Kiritsis","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As contemporary engineered systems become more interdependent, there is a growing need to manage their system complexity. However, system complexity only exists as implicit and heterogeneous information. This situation makes it difficult to obtain and analyze system complexity. This paper proposes a model-based approach to supporting system complexity management, called MBCM, where system complexity includes dynamic complexity and structural complexity. The proposed approach includes complexity modeling and complexity analysis. For complexity modeling, a graph-matrix hybrid complexity modeling approach is proposed to describe the dynamic and structural complexity information. Graph-based architecture models are developed by a unified meta-meta modeling approach. The connections among different architecture models are then described using a design structure matrix. For complexity analysis, a general complexity metric provides dynamic and structural complexity values for the designer to evaluate the system. Moreover, automatic ontology modeling is introduced to integrate complexity modeling and complexity analysis. Finally, a case study on aero-engine design was conducted. The complexity management processes of three different scenarios were compared in this case study. The comparison results show that our approach could sensitively represent increased product complexity from both dynamic and structural aspects. Thus, the proposed approach is general and applicable to any engineered system and can support the trade-off between complex product design schemes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 110776"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Product complexity management enabled by a model-based approach\",\"authors\":\"Zhenchao Hu ,&nbsp;Jinwei Chen ,&nbsp;Yuanfu Li ,&nbsp;Jinzhi Lu ,&nbsp;Huisheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Dimitris Kiritsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As contemporary engineered systems become more interdependent, there is a growing need to manage their system complexity. However, system complexity only exists as implicit and heterogeneous information. This situation makes it difficult to obtain and analyze system complexity. This paper proposes a model-based approach to supporting system complexity management, called MBCM, where system complexity includes dynamic complexity and structural complexity. The proposed approach includes complexity modeling and complexity analysis. For complexity modeling, a graph-matrix hybrid complexity modeling approach is proposed to describe the dynamic and structural complexity information. Graph-based architecture models are developed by a unified meta-meta modeling approach. The connections among different architecture models are then described using a design structure matrix. For complexity analysis, a general complexity metric provides dynamic and structural complexity values for the designer to evaluate the system. Moreover, automatic ontology modeling is introduced to integrate complexity modeling and complexity analysis. Finally, a case study on aero-engine design was conducted. The complexity management processes of three different scenarios were compared in this case study. The comparison results show that our approach could sensitively represent increased product complexity from both dynamic and structural aspects. Thus, the proposed approach is general and applicable to any engineered system and can support the trade-off between complex product design schemes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224008982\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224008982","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着当代工程系统变得更加相互依赖,越来越需要管理它们的系统复杂性。然而,系统复杂性只以隐式和异构信息的形式存在。这种情况给系统复杂性的获取和分析带来了困难。本文提出了一种基于模型的支持系统复杂性管理的方法,称为MBCM,其中系统复杂性包括动态复杂性和结构复杂性。该方法包括复杂性建模和复杂性分析。在复杂性建模方面,提出了一种图-矩阵混合复杂性建模方法来描述动态和结构复杂性信息。基于图的体系结构模型是通过统一的元元建模方法开发的。然后使用设计结构矩阵描述不同体系结构模型之间的联系。对于复杂性分析,一般的复杂性度量为设计人员评估系统提供了动态的和结构性的复杂性值。引入了自动本体建模,将复杂性建模与复杂性分析相结合。最后,以航空发动机设计为例进行了分析。本案例研究比较了三种不同场景下的复杂性管理流程。对比结果表明,该方法可以从动态和结构两个方面灵敏地反映产品复杂性的增加。因此,所提出的方法是通用的,适用于任何工程系统,可以支持复杂的产品设计方案之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Product complexity management enabled by a model-based approach
As contemporary engineered systems become more interdependent, there is a growing need to manage their system complexity. However, system complexity only exists as implicit and heterogeneous information. This situation makes it difficult to obtain and analyze system complexity. This paper proposes a model-based approach to supporting system complexity management, called MBCM, where system complexity includes dynamic complexity and structural complexity. The proposed approach includes complexity modeling and complexity analysis. For complexity modeling, a graph-matrix hybrid complexity modeling approach is proposed to describe the dynamic and structural complexity information. Graph-based architecture models are developed by a unified meta-meta modeling approach. The connections among different architecture models are then described using a design structure matrix. For complexity analysis, a general complexity metric provides dynamic and structural complexity values for the designer to evaluate the system. Moreover, automatic ontology modeling is introduced to integrate complexity modeling and complexity analysis. Finally, a case study on aero-engine design was conducted. The complexity management processes of three different scenarios were compared in this case study. The comparison results show that our approach could sensitively represent increased product complexity from both dynamic and structural aspects. Thus, the proposed approach is general and applicable to any engineered system and can support the trade-off between complex product design schemes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
TA-Net: real-time identification of transient actions in manual assembly lines Aging-aware fleet management for electric vehicle routing problem A case study on berth and marine experiment allocation method considering uncertainty for cargo and research ports An integrated optimization framework for low-carbon truck dispatching in open-pit mining Mode selection and pricing strategy for manufacturers in car sharing: the role of dispatch level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1