实验室安全风险认知量表:开发与验证

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103689
Chaohui Lin , Kangsheng Zheng , Siu Shing Man
{"title":"实验室安全风险认知量表:开发与验证","authors":"Chaohui Lin ,&nbsp;Kangsheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Siu Shing Man","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies on risk perception (RP) related to laboratory safety have not fully considered the affective aspect of RP and lacked a comprehensive validation of reliability and validity. Accordingly, the present study addresses the needs of this research area with the development of a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing laboratory workers' RP, namely, Risk Perception Scale for Laboratory Safety (RPSLS). Five hundred eighteen volunteer laboratory workers participated in the questionnaire survey. RPSLS consists of 24 items, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.945 to 0.953 and the intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9. Additionally, factor loadings and the average variance extracted (AVE) were above 0.70 and 0.5, respectively. The AVE square roots for four factors were above the construct correlations. These results demonstrated satisfactory reliability and discriminant and convergent validity, while acknowledging the moderate criterion-related validity. RPSLS was designed to measure four dimensions of RP: probability, severity, concern and unsafety. Negative correlations were found between the dimensions and laboratory workers engaging in risk-taking behaviour. RPSLS, as a reliable and valid tool, was established to evaluate laboratory workers' RP and is anticipated to support research on laboratory safety that considers workers' RP. RPSLS can be utilised as an assessment tool to identify laboratory workers likely to underestimate risks in hazardous experimental conditions. This insight can guide the development of targeted safety training programs, minimising unnecessary training effort and enhancing overall laboratory safety outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 103689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk perception scale for laboratory safety: Development and validation\",\"authors\":\"Chaohui Lin ,&nbsp;Kangsheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Siu Shing Man\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous studies on risk perception (RP) related to laboratory safety have not fully considered the affective aspect of RP and lacked a comprehensive validation of reliability and validity. Accordingly, the present study addresses the needs of this research area with the development of a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing laboratory workers' RP, namely, Risk Perception Scale for Laboratory Safety (RPSLS). Five hundred eighteen volunteer laboratory workers participated in the questionnaire survey. RPSLS consists of 24 items, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.945 to 0.953 and the intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9. Additionally, factor loadings and the average variance extracted (AVE) were above 0.70 and 0.5, respectively. The AVE square roots for four factors were above the construct correlations. These results demonstrated satisfactory reliability and discriminant and convergent validity, while acknowledging the moderate criterion-related validity. RPSLS was designed to measure four dimensions of RP: probability, severity, concern and unsafety. Negative correlations were found between the dimensions and laboratory workers engaging in risk-taking behaviour. RPSLS, as a reliable and valid tool, was established to evaluate laboratory workers' RP and is anticipated to support research on laboratory safety that considers workers' RP. RPSLS can be utilised as an assessment tool to identify laboratory workers likely to underestimate risks in hazardous experimental conditions. This insight can guide the development of targeted safety training programs, minimising unnecessary training effort and enhancing overall laboratory safety outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124001458\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124001458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk perception scale for laboratory safety: Development and validation
Previous studies on risk perception (RP) related to laboratory safety have not fully considered the affective aspect of RP and lacked a comprehensive validation of reliability and validity. Accordingly, the present study addresses the needs of this research area with the development of a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing laboratory workers' RP, namely, Risk Perception Scale for Laboratory Safety (RPSLS). Five hundred eighteen volunteer laboratory workers participated in the questionnaire survey. RPSLS consists of 24 items, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.945 to 0.953 and the intra-class correlation coefficient exceeding 0.9. Additionally, factor loadings and the average variance extracted (AVE) were above 0.70 and 0.5, respectively. The AVE square roots for four factors were above the construct correlations. These results demonstrated satisfactory reliability and discriminant and convergent validity, while acknowledging the moderate criterion-related validity. RPSLS was designed to measure four dimensions of RP: probability, severity, concern and unsafety. Negative correlations were found between the dimensions and laboratory workers engaging in risk-taking behaviour. RPSLS, as a reliable and valid tool, was established to evaluate laboratory workers' RP and is anticipated to support research on laboratory safety that considers workers' RP. RPSLS can be utilised as an assessment tool to identify laboratory workers likely to underestimate risks in hazardous experimental conditions. This insight can guide the development of targeted safety training programs, minimising unnecessary training effort and enhancing overall laboratory safety outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
期刊最新文献
Experimental investigation of submersible buoyancy regulation and support task performance under different levels of automation and varying workloads Investigating the influence of multitasking and gender in visuomotor skills of 1578 pilot candidates IMU-based estimation of body posture: Laboratory validation in simulated commercial fishing Quantitative assessment of driver visibility of a cyclist though computer model The effect of occupation-related and worker-related factors on upper limb disorders using strain index among O∗NET jobs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1