{"title":"求职时自己修整头像照片还是请专业人士修整?各种修图方法对面部印象认知的区别","authors":"Winnie Fang , Yu-Chi Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Retouching photographs has become a common behaviour in daily life, because of the development of related technology. However, there is insufficient data on how such approaches affect impression judgments for job applications. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between various retouched profile photos as first impressions for male and female perceivers. A total of 158 perceivers were recruited, and six retouching approaches (original, self-retouch, professionally retouched with 2- and 8-year work experiences and self-retouch after the two types of professional retouch) were examined in the study. Visual analogue scales measured six dimensions of facial impression (trustworthiness, dominance, attractiveness, competence, confidence and likability). Results indicated that retouching approaches and perceivers' gender significantly affected the six impressions (all p < .01). The original photo and 8-year professionally retouched photo had the overall lowest (45.29) and highest (53.42) impression scores, respectively. The impression judgments improved after self-retouching the original photo (average score increased to 48.02). In contrast, self-retouch after a professional retouch generated a considerable decrease in trustworthiness, competence and likability by 1.79–2.0 scores. Female (51.45) perceivers gave substantially higher (all p < .01) impression scores than males (48.90). Interaction effects were identified in the feelings of trustworthiness and dominance (all p < .01). The results suggest that photos retouched by experienced professionals generated better impressions, regardless of the perceiver's gender. These findings offered practical guidance for job applicants and hiring professionals to optimize photo use in applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 103700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retouching headshot photo by myself or professionals while job application? Difference between various retouching approaches on facial impressions perception\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Fang , Yu-Chi Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Retouching photographs has become a common behaviour in daily life, because of the development of related technology. However, there is insufficient data on how such approaches affect impression judgments for job applications. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between various retouched profile photos as first impressions for male and female perceivers. A total of 158 perceivers were recruited, and six retouching approaches (original, self-retouch, professionally retouched with 2- and 8-year work experiences and self-retouch after the two types of professional retouch) were examined in the study. Visual analogue scales measured six dimensions of facial impression (trustworthiness, dominance, attractiveness, competence, confidence and likability). Results indicated that retouching approaches and perceivers' gender significantly affected the six impressions (all p < .01). The original photo and 8-year professionally retouched photo had the overall lowest (45.29) and highest (53.42) impression scores, respectively. The impression judgments improved after self-retouching the original photo (average score increased to 48.02). In contrast, self-retouch after a professional retouch generated a considerable decrease in trustworthiness, competence and likability by 1.79–2.0 scores. Female (51.45) perceivers gave substantially higher (all p < .01) impression scores than males (48.90). Interaction effects were identified in the feelings of trustworthiness and dominance (all p < .01). The results suggest that photos retouched by experienced professionals generated better impressions, regardless of the perceiver's gender. These findings offered practical guidance for job applicants and hiring professionals to optimize photo use in applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016981412500006X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016981412500006X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于相关技术的发展,修饰照片已成为日常生活中的一种常见行为。然而,关于这种做法如何影响求职者印象判断的数据却并不充分。本研究旨在评估各种经过修饰的个人资料照片给男性和女性感知者第一印象的差异。研究共招募了 158 名感知者,考察了六种修图方式(原始修图、自我修图、2 年和 8 年工作经验的专业修图以及两种专业修图后的自我修图)。视觉模拟量表测量了面部印象的六个维度(可信度、支配力、吸引力、能力、自信心和好感度)。结果表明,修图方法和感知者的性别对六种印象有显著影响(所有 p < .01)。原始照片和 8 年专业修饰照片的总体印象分分别最低(45.29 分)和最高(53.42 分)。对原始照片进行自我修饰后,印象判断有所改善(平均分增至 48.02)。相比之下,经过专业修图后的自我修图在可信度、能力和好感度方面都大大降低了 1.79-2.0 分。女性(51.45)比男性(48.90)给出的印象分要高得多(所有 p 均为 0.01)。在可信度和支配感方面发现了交互效应(均为 p < .01)。结果表明,无论感知者的性别如何,由经验丰富的专业人士修饰过的照片都能给人留下更好的印象。这些研究结果为求职者和招聘专业人员在申请中优化照片的使用提供了实用指导。
Retouching headshot photo by myself or professionals while job application? Difference between various retouching approaches on facial impressions perception
Retouching photographs has become a common behaviour in daily life, because of the development of related technology. However, there is insufficient data on how such approaches affect impression judgments for job applications. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between various retouched profile photos as first impressions for male and female perceivers. A total of 158 perceivers were recruited, and six retouching approaches (original, self-retouch, professionally retouched with 2- and 8-year work experiences and self-retouch after the two types of professional retouch) were examined in the study. Visual analogue scales measured six dimensions of facial impression (trustworthiness, dominance, attractiveness, competence, confidence and likability). Results indicated that retouching approaches and perceivers' gender significantly affected the six impressions (all p < .01). The original photo and 8-year professionally retouched photo had the overall lowest (45.29) and highest (53.42) impression scores, respectively. The impression judgments improved after self-retouching the original photo (average score increased to 48.02). In contrast, self-retouch after a professional retouch generated a considerable decrease in trustworthiness, competence and likability by 1.79–2.0 scores. Female (51.45) perceivers gave substantially higher (all p < .01) impression scores than males (48.90). Interaction effects were identified in the feelings of trustworthiness and dominance (all p < .01). The results suggest that photos retouched by experienced professionals generated better impressions, regardless of the perceiver's gender. These findings offered practical guidance for job applicants and hiring professionals to optimize photo use in applications.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.