比较IA期非小细胞肺癌局部肿瘤切除术、肺叶下切除术和肺叶切除术的生存结果:一项来自SEER数据库的研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL European Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s40001-025-02325-9
Lin Cheng, Sheng-Wei Li, Xiao-Guang Li
{"title":"比较IA期非小细胞肺癌局部肿瘤切除术、肺叶下切除术和肺叶切除术的生存结果:一项来自SEER数据库的研究。","authors":"Lin Cheng, Sheng-Wei Li, Xiao-Guang Li","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02325-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A large-scale comparative analysis was performed with the aim of comparing local tumor destruction (LTD), sublobar resection (SR), and pulmonary lobectomy (PL) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2021), we included patients with pathologically confirmed stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with LTD, SR, or PL. Comparison between groups was performed separately after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper value of 0.1. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort of 4437 LTD patients, 2425 SR patients, and 6386 PL patients, 84.18% of LTD-treated patients were older than 65 years, whereas 68.95% of SR-treated patients and 62.82% of PL-treated patients were older than 65 years. The CSS (HR = 0.756, 95% CI 0.398 ~ 1.436, P = 0.393) and OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.553 ~ 1.295, P = 0.442) of LTD were consistent with SR. Whereas LTD demonstrated lower CSS (HR = 0.603, 95% CI 0.378 ~ 0.940, P = 0.024) and OS (HR = 0.590, 95% CI 0.432 ~ 0.805, P < 0.001) than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm. The CSS (HR = 1.215, 95% CI 0.872 ~ 1.693, P = 0.249) of SR was consistent with PL, but OS (HR = 1.347, 95% CI 1.079 ~ 1.681, P = 0.008) was higher than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was 1.1-3 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of SR. Compared with PL, the CSS and OS of LTD were lower, but when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of PL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing survival outcomes of localized tumor destruction, sublobar resection, and pulmonary lobectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a study from the SEER database.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Cheng, Sheng-Wei Li, Xiao-Guang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-02325-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A large-scale comparative analysis was performed with the aim of comparing local tumor destruction (LTD), sublobar resection (SR), and pulmonary lobectomy (PL) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2021), we included patients with pathologically confirmed stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with LTD, SR, or PL. Comparison between groups was performed separately after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper value of 0.1. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort of 4437 LTD patients, 2425 SR patients, and 6386 PL patients, 84.18% of LTD-treated patients were older than 65 years, whereas 68.95% of SR-treated patients and 62.82% of PL-treated patients were older than 65 years. The CSS (HR = 0.756, 95% CI 0.398 ~ 1.436, P = 0.393) and OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.553 ~ 1.295, P = 0.442) of LTD were consistent with SR. Whereas LTD demonstrated lower CSS (HR = 0.603, 95% CI 0.378 ~ 0.940, P = 0.024) and OS (HR = 0.590, 95% CI 0.432 ~ 0.805, P < 0.001) than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm. The CSS (HR = 1.215, 95% CI 0.872 ~ 1.693, P = 0.249) of SR was consistent with PL, but OS (HR = 1.347, 95% CI 1.079 ~ 1.681, P = 0.008) was higher than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was 1.1-3 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of SR. Compared with PL, the CSS and OS of LTD were lower, but when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of PL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02325-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02325-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们进行了一项大规模的比较分析,旨在比较局部肿瘤切除术(LTD)、肺叶下垂切除术(SR)和肺叶切除术(PL)对IA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)的影响:在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2000-2021年)中,我们纳入了经病理证实的IA期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者接受了LTD、SR或PL治疗。组间比较在1:1比例倾向评分匹配(PSM)后分别进行,卡方值为0.1。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔分析比较各组间的生存结果:在4437名LTD患者、2425名SR患者和6386名PL患者中,84.18%的LTD患者年龄大于65岁,而68.95%的SR患者和62.82%的PL患者年龄大于65岁。LTD的CSS(HR = 0.756,95% CI 0.398 ~ 1.436,P = 0.393)和OS(HR = 0.46,95% CI 0.553 ~ 1.295,P = 0.442)与SR一致。而LTD的CSS(HR = 0.603,95% CI 0.378 ~ 0.940,P = 0.024)和OS(HR = 0.590,95% CI 0.432 ~ 0.805,P)均低于SR:在IA期非小细胞肺癌患者中,LTD的CSS和OS并不比SR差。与PL相比,LTD的CSS和OS较低,但当肿瘤大小≤1厘米时,LTD的CSS和OS并不比PL差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing survival outcomes of localized tumor destruction, sublobar resection, and pulmonary lobectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a study from the SEER database.

Purpose: A large-scale comparative analysis was performed with the aim of comparing local tumor destruction (LTD), sublobar resection (SR), and pulmonary lobectomy (PL) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2021), we included patients with pathologically confirmed stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with LTD, SR, or PL. Comparison between groups was performed separately after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper value of 0.1. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes between groups.

Results: In the total cohort of 4437 LTD patients, 2425 SR patients, and 6386 PL patients, 84.18% of LTD-treated patients were older than 65 years, whereas 68.95% of SR-treated patients and 62.82% of PL-treated patients were older than 65 years. The CSS (HR = 0.756, 95% CI 0.398 ~ 1.436, P = 0.393) and OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.553 ~ 1.295, P = 0.442) of LTD were consistent with SR. Whereas LTD demonstrated lower CSS (HR = 0.603, 95% CI 0.378 ~ 0.940, P = 0.024) and OS (HR = 0.590, 95% CI 0.432 ~ 0.805, P < 0.001) than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm. The CSS (HR = 1.215, 95% CI 0.872 ~ 1.693, P = 0.249) of SR was consistent with PL, but OS (HR = 1.347, 95% CI 1.079 ~ 1.681, P = 0.008) was higher than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was 1.1-3 cm.

Conclusions: In patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of SR. Compared with PL, the CSS and OS of LTD were lower, but when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of PL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of neurosyphilis: analysis of symptoms and risk factors. Application of plasma cell-free DNA in screening of advanced colorectal adenoma. Clinical study on the effects of over time window thrombectomy and thrombolytic therapy on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression and postoperative brain function after acute cerebral infarction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography consultation after digestive tract reconstruction and risk factors for complications. Evaluating dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancers in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1