2016-2019年中西部大型卫生系统中通过电子健康记录识别的莱姆病流行病学

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae758
Kiersten J Kugeler, Erica Scotty, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah A Hook, Courtney C Nawrocki, Anne M Nikolai, Alexandra M Linz, Jennifer Meece, Anna M Schotthoefer
{"title":"2016-2019年中西部大型卫生系统中通过电子健康记录识别的莱姆病流行病学","authors":"Kiersten J Kugeler, Erica Scotty, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah A Hook, Courtney C Nawrocki, Anne M Nikolai, Alexandra M Linz, Jennifer Meece, Anna M Schotthoefer","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States; however, its frequency is not reliably measured through surveillance. Electronic health records (EHR) might capture the frequency and characteristics of Lyme disease cases more accurately. We queried EHR from 1 health system to describe the epidemiology of Lyme disease cases in Wisconsin during 2016-2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a cohort of persons evaluated for Lyme disease, we applied a Lyme disease case definition based on first-line antibiotics within 14 days of a Lyme disease diagnosis code or test order or on the same day as a related keyword in clinical notes. We compared characteristics of cases to those of cases reported through surveillance and reviewed medical charts to assess case definition validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 67 289 possible Lyme disease events in the cohort, 13 494 (20.1%) met our Lyme disease case definition. Cases were more common among males, children 5-9 years, older adults, White non-Hispanic persons, and in the summer months. EHR-based Lyme disease incidence was 4-8 times that reported through surveillance. The EHR definition had moderately high sensitivity (83.4%) and specificity (71.1%) for confirmed and probable Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR queries show promise to capture the incidence of Lyme disease more completely and provide more robust clinical information than public health surveillance. Demographic and seasonal characteristics of EHR-identified cases were comparable to those identified through surveillance. Further algorithm refinement might improve accuracy of measuring Lyme disease in EHR systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 2","pages":"ofae758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of Lyme Disease as Identified Through Electronic Health Records in a Large Midwestern Health System, 2016-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Kiersten J Kugeler, Erica Scotty, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah A Hook, Courtney C Nawrocki, Anne M Nikolai, Alexandra M Linz, Jennifer Meece, Anna M Schotthoefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States; however, its frequency is not reliably measured through surveillance. Electronic health records (EHR) might capture the frequency and characteristics of Lyme disease cases more accurately. We queried EHR from 1 health system to describe the epidemiology of Lyme disease cases in Wisconsin during 2016-2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a cohort of persons evaluated for Lyme disease, we applied a Lyme disease case definition based on first-line antibiotics within 14 days of a Lyme disease diagnosis code or test order or on the same day as a related keyword in clinical notes. We compared characteristics of cases to those of cases reported through surveillance and reviewed medical charts to assess case definition validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 67 289 possible Lyme disease events in the cohort, 13 494 (20.1%) met our Lyme disease case definition. Cases were more common among males, children 5-9 years, older adults, White non-Hispanic persons, and in the summer months. EHR-based Lyme disease incidence was 4-8 times that reported through surveillance. The EHR definition had moderately high sensitivity (83.4%) and specificity (71.1%) for confirmed and probable Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR queries show promise to capture the incidence of Lyme disease more completely and provide more robust clinical information than public health surveillance. Demographic and seasonal characteristics of EHR-identified cases were comparable to those identified through surveillance. Further algorithm refinement might improve accuracy of measuring Lyme disease in EHR systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"ofae758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:莱姆病是美国最常见的媒介传播疾病;然而,它的频率不能通过监测可靠地测量出来。电子健康记录(EHR)可以更准确地捕捉莱姆病病例的频率和特征。我们查询了来自1个卫生系统的电子病历,以描述2016-2019年威斯康星州莱姆病病例的流行病学。方法:在一组莱姆病评估人群中,我们采用了莱姆病病例定义,基于一线抗生素,莱姆病诊断代码或检测命令14天内,或与临床记录中的相关关键词同一天。我们将病例的特征与通过监测报告的病例的特征进行比较,并审查医疗图表以评估病例定义的有效性。结果:在67289例可能的莱姆病事件中,13494例(20.1%)符合莱姆病病例定义。病例多见于男性、5-9岁儿童、老年人、非西班牙裔白人和夏季。基于ehr的莱姆病发病率是通过监测报告的4-8倍。EHR定义对确诊和可能的莱姆病具有中等高的敏感性(83.4%)和特异性(71.1%)。结论:电子病历查询有望比公共卫生监测更全面地捕获莱姆病的发病率,并提供更可靠的临床信息。ehr确定病例的人口统计学和季节性特征与通过监测确定的病例相当。进一步的算法改进可能会提高电子病历系统中测量莱姆病的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemiology of Lyme Disease as Identified Through Electronic Health Records in a Large Midwestern Health System, 2016-2019.

Background: Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States; however, its frequency is not reliably measured through surveillance. Electronic health records (EHR) might capture the frequency and characteristics of Lyme disease cases more accurately. We queried EHR from 1 health system to describe the epidemiology of Lyme disease cases in Wisconsin during 2016-2019.

Methods: Within a cohort of persons evaluated for Lyme disease, we applied a Lyme disease case definition based on first-line antibiotics within 14 days of a Lyme disease diagnosis code or test order or on the same day as a related keyword in clinical notes. We compared characteristics of cases to those of cases reported through surveillance and reviewed medical charts to assess case definition validity.

Results: Among 67 289 possible Lyme disease events in the cohort, 13 494 (20.1%) met our Lyme disease case definition. Cases were more common among males, children 5-9 years, older adults, White non-Hispanic persons, and in the summer months. EHR-based Lyme disease incidence was 4-8 times that reported through surveillance. The EHR definition had moderately high sensitivity (83.4%) and specificity (71.1%) for confirmed and probable Lyme disease.

Conclusions: EHR queries show promise to capture the incidence of Lyme disease more completely and provide more robust clinical information than public health surveillance. Demographic and seasonal characteristics of EHR-identified cases were comparable to those identified through surveillance. Further algorithm refinement might improve accuracy of measuring Lyme disease in EHR systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Changes in Chlamydia Treatment Guidelines on Recurrent/Persistent Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis Infections. Sustained Virologic Suppression After Discontinuation of Long-acting Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine: A Two-case Series Highlighting Unexpected Heterogeneity in Pharmacokinetics and Viral Control. Association of Cannabis Use With Risk of Subsequent Falls Among Adults Aging With HIV. Cefadroxil as Oral Transitional Therapy for Gram-Positive Bacteremia With or Without Non-Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling for Postmortem Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis in Zambian Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1