利用人工智能选择中度乳腺癌风险的女性进行乳房MRI筛查。

IF 17.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.233067
Suzanne L van Winkel, Riccardo Samperna, Elizabeth A Loehrer, Jaap Kroes, Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz, Ritse M Mann
{"title":"利用人工智能选择中度乳腺癌风险的女性进行乳房MRI筛查。","authors":"Suzanne L van Winkel, Riccardo Samperna, Elizabeth A Loehrer, Jaap Kroes, Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz, Ritse M Mann","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Combined mammography and MRI screening is not universally accessible for women with intermediate breast cancer risk due to limited MRI resources. Selecting women for MRI by assessing their mammogram may enable more resource-effective screening. Purpose To explore the feasibility of using a commercial artificial intelligence (AI) system at mammography to stratify women with intermediate risk for supplemental MRI or no MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive women with intermediate risk screened with mammography and MRI between January 2003 and January 2020 at a Dutch university medical center. An AI system was used to independently evaluate all mammograms, providing a case-based score that ranked the likelihood of a malignancy on a scale of 1-10. Different AI thresholds for supplemental MRI screening were tested, balancing cancer detection against the number of women needing to undergo MRI. Univariate analyses were used to explore associations between personal factors (age, breast density, and duration of screening participation) and AI results. Results In 760 women (mean age, 48.9 years ± 10.5 [SD]), 2819 combined screening examinations were performed, and 37 breast cancers were detected. Use of AI at mammography achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.81) for the entire intermediate-risk population and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93) for women with prior breast cancer. Using a threshold score of 5, 31 of 37 (84%) breast cancers were detected, including 13 of 19 (68%) mammographically occult cancers, at a supplemental breast MRI rate of 50% (1409 of 2819 examinations). No significant association between breast density or age and the probability of a false-negative AI result was found. Conclusion Using AI at mammography to select women for supplemental MRI effectively identified women with higher breast cancer risk in an intermediate-risk population, including women with mammographically occult cancers. AI selection of women with intermediate risk for supplemental MRI screening has the potential to reduce screening burden and costs, while maintaining a high cancer detection rate. © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"314 2","pages":"e233067"},"PeriodicalIF":17.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using AI to Select Women with Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk for Breast Screening with MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne L van Winkel, Riccardo Samperna, Elizabeth A Loehrer, Jaap Kroes, Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz, Ritse M Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/radiol.233067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Combined mammography and MRI screening is not universally accessible for women with intermediate breast cancer risk due to limited MRI resources. Selecting women for MRI by assessing their mammogram may enable more resource-effective screening. Purpose To explore the feasibility of using a commercial artificial intelligence (AI) system at mammography to stratify women with intermediate risk for supplemental MRI or no MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive women with intermediate risk screened with mammography and MRI between January 2003 and January 2020 at a Dutch university medical center. An AI system was used to independently evaluate all mammograms, providing a case-based score that ranked the likelihood of a malignancy on a scale of 1-10. Different AI thresholds for supplemental MRI screening were tested, balancing cancer detection against the number of women needing to undergo MRI. Univariate analyses were used to explore associations between personal factors (age, breast density, and duration of screening participation) and AI results. Results In 760 women (mean age, 48.9 years ± 10.5 [SD]), 2819 combined screening examinations were performed, and 37 breast cancers were detected. Use of AI at mammography achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.81) for the entire intermediate-risk population and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93) for women with prior breast cancer. Using a threshold score of 5, 31 of 37 (84%) breast cancers were detected, including 13 of 19 (68%) mammographically occult cancers, at a supplemental breast MRI rate of 50% (1409 of 2819 examinations). No significant association between breast density or age and the probability of a false-negative AI result was found. Conclusion Using AI at mammography to select women for supplemental MRI effectively identified women with higher breast cancer risk in an intermediate-risk population, including women with mammographically occult cancers. AI selection of women with intermediate risk for supplemental MRI screening has the potential to reduce screening burden and costs, while maintaining a high cancer detection rate. © RSNA, 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology\",\"volume\":\"314 2\",\"pages\":\"e233067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于MRI资源有限,对于中等乳腺癌风险的女性,乳房x光检查和MRI筛查并不普遍。通过评估乳房x光片来选择接受核磁共振成像的女性,可能会使筛查更加有效。目的探讨在乳房x线摄影中使用商业人工智能(AI)系统对中等风险女性进行分层,以补充MRI或不进行MRI的可行性。材料和方法本回顾性研究纳入了2003年1月至2020年1月在荷兰一所大学医学中心连续接受乳房x光检查和MRI筛查的中等风险妇女。使用人工智能系统独立评估所有乳房x光片,提供基于病例的评分,将恶性肿瘤的可能性按1-10分进行排名。研究人员测试了补充MRI筛查的不同人工智能阈值,以平衡癌症检测和需要接受MRI检查的女性人数。单变量分析用于探讨个人因素(年龄、乳腺密度和参与筛查的持续时间)与人工智能结果之间的关系。结果760例女性(平均年龄48.9岁±10.5岁[SD])进行了2819次联合筛查,发现37例乳腺癌。在整个中危人群中,人工智能在乳房x光检查中的应用获得了接受者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.72 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.81),对于既往患有乳腺癌的女性,该面积为0.81 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93)。使用阈值评分5,37例(84%)乳腺癌中有31例被检测到,其中19例(68%)乳房x光检查隐匿性癌症中有13例被检测到,补充乳腺MRI检查率为50%(2819例检查中有1409例)。未发现乳腺密度或年龄与人工智能假阴性结果的概率之间存在显著关联。结论:在乳房x光检查中使用人工智能选择女性进行补充MRI,可以有效地识别中危人群中乳腺癌风险较高的女性,包括乳房x光检查中隐匿性癌症的女性。人工智能选择中等风险的女性进行补充MRI筛查有可能减轻筛查负担和成本,同时保持较高的癌症检出率。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using AI to Select Women with Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk for Breast Screening with MRI.

Background Combined mammography and MRI screening is not universally accessible for women with intermediate breast cancer risk due to limited MRI resources. Selecting women for MRI by assessing their mammogram may enable more resource-effective screening. Purpose To explore the feasibility of using a commercial artificial intelligence (AI) system at mammography to stratify women with intermediate risk for supplemental MRI or no MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive women with intermediate risk screened with mammography and MRI between January 2003 and January 2020 at a Dutch university medical center. An AI system was used to independently evaluate all mammograms, providing a case-based score that ranked the likelihood of a malignancy on a scale of 1-10. Different AI thresholds for supplemental MRI screening were tested, balancing cancer detection against the number of women needing to undergo MRI. Univariate analyses were used to explore associations between personal factors (age, breast density, and duration of screening participation) and AI results. Results In 760 women (mean age, 48.9 years ± 10.5 [SD]), 2819 combined screening examinations were performed, and 37 breast cancers were detected. Use of AI at mammography achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.81) for the entire intermediate-risk population and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93) for women with prior breast cancer. Using a threshold score of 5, 31 of 37 (84%) breast cancers were detected, including 13 of 19 (68%) mammographically occult cancers, at a supplemental breast MRI rate of 50% (1409 of 2819 examinations). No significant association between breast density or age and the probability of a false-negative AI result was found. Conclusion Using AI at mammography to select women for supplemental MRI effectively identified women with higher breast cancer risk in an intermediate-risk population, including women with mammographically occult cancers. AI selection of women with intermediate risk for supplemental MRI screening has the potential to reduce screening burden and costs, while maintaining a high cancer detection rate. © RSNA, 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
One-year Follow-up after US-guided Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer: Worldwide Registry Study. AI-based Histologic Heterogeneity of Microvascular Obstruction at Cardiac MRI for Predicting MACEs: A Multicenter Study. Impact of AI-based Slab Reconstruction Technology on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. From X-ray to Cinematic Rendering: Maffucci Syndrome. Evaluating Accuracy of LI-RADS Nonradiation Treatment Response Algorithm v2024 and Ancillary Features at Hepatobiliary MRI versus CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1