{"title":"中德优秀青少年足球运动员比赛时的时空压力与表现差异","authors":"Yapu Liang, Tianhe Li, Hansi Xu, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In modern football, spatial and temporal pressure significantly influence player performance and tactical outcomes, particularly in youth competitions. This study aims to investigate the spatial pressure differences between Chinese and German U17 elite youth football teams, focusing on the ball-handler's distance to the nearest defender (D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video analysis was conducted to measure D across various match contexts, including scorelines (leading, tied, and trailing), game phases (passing and receiving), pass outcomes (successful and unsuccessful), and pitch zones. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods to compare the D under different conditions. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and Kruskal-Wallis <i>H</i> test were used to identify significant differences, with <i>post hoc</i> comparisons conducted where necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that the German team consistently maintained greater D than the Chinese team (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.463), highlighting their superior spatial management and tactical adaptability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Greater D was associated with enhanced offensive flexibility and defensive stability, allowing the German team to create space effectively and maintain structural integrity under pressure. In contrast, the Chinese team's smaller D suggested limitations in spatial utilization and higher defensive engagement risks. These findings underscore the importance of tactical training emphasizing spatial awareness and balanced pressure management, providing valuable insights for youth football development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1543287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in spatiotemporal pressure and performance between Chinese and German elite youth football players during matches.\",\"authors\":\"Yapu Liang, Tianhe Li, Hansi Xu, Peng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In modern football, spatial and temporal pressure significantly influence player performance and tactical outcomes, particularly in youth competitions. This study aims to investigate the spatial pressure differences between Chinese and German U17 elite youth football teams, focusing on the ball-handler's distance to the nearest defender (D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video analysis was conducted to measure D across various match contexts, including scorelines (leading, tied, and trailing), game phases (passing and receiving), pass outcomes (successful and unsuccessful), and pitch zones. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods to compare the D under different conditions. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and Kruskal-Wallis <i>H</i> test were used to identify significant differences, with <i>post hoc</i> comparisons conducted where necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that the German team consistently maintained greater D than the Chinese team (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.463), highlighting their superior spatial management and tactical adaptability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Greater D was associated with enhanced offensive flexibility and defensive stability, allowing the German team to create space effectively and maintain structural integrity under pressure. In contrast, the Chinese team's smaller D suggested limitations in spatial utilization and higher defensive engagement risks. These findings underscore the importance of tactical training emphasizing spatial awareness and balanced pressure management, providing valuable insights for youth football development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1543287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在现代足球中,空间和时间压力显著影响球员的表现和战术结果,特别是在青少年比赛中。本研究旨在研究中德U17精英青年足球队的空间压力差异,重点关注持球者与最近后卫的距离(D)。方法:通过视频分析,测量不同比赛背景下的空间压力差异,包括比分线(领先、平局和落后)、比赛阶段(传球和接球)、传球结果(成功和不成功)和球场区域。采用非参数方法进行统计分析,比较不同条件下的D值。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验来确定显著差异,必要时进行事后比较。结果:结果显示,德国队始终保持着比中国队更大的D值(p D = 0.463),突出了德国队在空间管理和战术适应性上的优势。讨论:大D与进攻灵活性和防守稳定性的增强有关,使德国队能够有效地创造空间,并在压力下保持结构完整性。相比之下,中国队的D值较小,表明空间利用的局限性和更高的防守交战风险。这些发现强调了强调空间意识和平衡压力管理的战术训练的重要性,为青少年足球发展提供了有价值的见解。
Differences in spatiotemporal pressure and performance between Chinese and German elite youth football players during matches.
Introduction: In modern football, spatial and temporal pressure significantly influence player performance and tactical outcomes, particularly in youth competitions. This study aims to investigate the spatial pressure differences between Chinese and German U17 elite youth football teams, focusing on the ball-handler's distance to the nearest defender (D).
Methods: Video analysis was conducted to measure D across various match contexts, including scorelines (leading, tied, and trailing), game phases (passing and receiving), pass outcomes (successful and unsuccessful), and pitch zones. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods to compare the D under different conditions. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to identify significant differences, with post hoc comparisons conducted where necessary.
Results: Results show that the German team consistently maintained greater D than the Chinese team (p < 0.001, d = 0.463), highlighting their superior spatial management and tactical adaptability.
Discussion: Greater D was associated with enhanced offensive flexibility and defensive stability, allowing the German team to create space effectively and maintain structural integrity under pressure. In contrast, the Chinese team's smaller D suggested limitations in spatial utilization and higher defensive engagement risks. These findings underscore the importance of tactical training emphasizing spatial awareness and balanced pressure management, providing valuable insights for youth football development.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.