中德优秀青少年足球运动员比赛时的时空压力与表现差异

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287
Yapu Liang, Tianhe Li, Hansi Xu, Peng Zhang
{"title":"中德优秀青少年足球运动员比赛时的时空压力与表现差异","authors":"Yapu Liang, Tianhe Li, Hansi Xu, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In modern football, spatial and temporal pressure significantly influence player performance and tactical outcomes, particularly in youth competitions. This study aims to investigate the spatial pressure differences between Chinese and German U17 elite youth football teams, focusing on the ball-handler's distance to the nearest defender (D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video analysis was conducted to measure D across various match contexts, including scorelines (leading, tied, and trailing), game phases (passing and receiving), pass outcomes (successful and unsuccessful), and pitch zones. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods to compare the D under different conditions. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and Kruskal-Wallis <i>H</i> test were used to identify significant differences, with <i>post hoc</i> comparisons conducted where necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that the German team consistently maintained greater D than the Chinese team (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.463), highlighting their superior spatial management and tactical adaptability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Greater D was associated with enhanced offensive flexibility and defensive stability, allowing the German team to create space effectively and maintain structural integrity under pressure. In contrast, the Chinese team's smaller D suggested limitations in spatial utilization and higher defensive engagement risks. These findings underscore the importance of tactical training emphasizing spatial awareness and balanced pressure management, providing valuable insights for youth football development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1543287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in spatiotemporal pressure and performance between Chinese and German elite youth football players during matches.\",\"authors\":\"Yapu Liang, Tianhe Li, Hansi Xu, Peng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In modern football, spatial and temporal pressure significantly influence player performance and tactical outcomes, particularly in youth competitions. This study aims to investigate the spatial pressure differences between Chinese and German U17 elite youth football teams, focusing on the ball-handler's distance to the nearest defender (D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video analysis was conducted to measure D across various match contexts, including scorelines (leading, tied, and trailing), game phases (passing and receiving), pass outcomes (successful and unsuccessful), and pitch zones. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods to compare the D under different conditions. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and Kruskal-Wallis <i>H</i> test were used to identify significant differences, with <i>post hoc</i> comparisons conducted where necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show that the German team consistently maintained greater D than the Chinese team (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.463), highlighting their superior spatial management and tactical adaptability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Greater D was associated with enhanced offensive flexibility and defensive stability, allowing the German team to create space effectively and maintain structural integrity under pressure. In contrast, the Chinese team's smaller D suggested limitations in spatial utilization and higher defensive engagement risks. These findings underscore the importance of tactical training emphasizing spatial awareness and balanced pressure management, providing valuable insights for youth football development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1543287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代足球中,空间和时间压力显著影响球员的表现和战术结果,特别是在青少年比赛中。本研究旨在研究中德U17精英青年足球队的空间压力差异,重点关注持球者与最近后卫的距离(D)。方法:通过视频分析,测量不同比赛背景下的空间压力差异,包括比分线(领先、平局和落后)、比赛阶段(传球和接球)、传球结果(成功和不成功)和球场区域。采用非参数方法进行统计分析,比较不同条件下的D值。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验来确定显著差异,必要时进行事后比较。结果:结果显示,德国队始终保持着比中国队更大的D值(p D = 0.463),突出了德国队在空间管理和战术适应性上的优势。讨论:大D与进攻灵活性和防守稳定性的增强有关,使德国队能够有效地创造空间,并在压力下保持结构完整性。相比之下,中国队的D值较小,表明空间利用的局限性和更高的防守交战风险。这些发现强调了强调空间意识和平衡压力管理的战术训练的重要性,为青少年足球发展提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in spatiotemporal pressure and performance between Chinese and German elite youth football players during matches.

Introduction: In modern football, spatial and temporal pressure significantly influence player performance and tactical outcomes, particularly in youth competitions. This study aims to investigate the spatial pressure differences between Chinese and German U17 elite youth football teams, focusing on the ball-handler's distance to the nearest defender (D).

Methods: Video analysis was conducted to measure D across various match contexts, including scorelines (leading, tied, and trailing), game phases (passing and receiving), pass outcomes (successful and unsuccessful), and pitch zones. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric methods to compare the D under different conditions. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to identify significant differences, with post hoc comparisons conducted where necessary.

Results: Results show that the German team consistently maintained greater D than the Chinese team (p < 0.001, d = 0.463), highlighting their superior spatial management and tactical adaptability.

Discussion: Greater D was associated with enhanced offensive flexibility and defensive stability, allowing the German team to create space effectively and maintain structural integrity under pressure. In contrast, the Chinese team's smaller D suggested limitations in spatial utilization and higher defensive engagement risks. These findings underscore the importance of tactical training emphasizing spatial awareness and balanced pressure management, providing valuable insights for youth football development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
期刊最新文献
Regional cognitive pathways to intention to use AI: a structural equation modeling approach. Research on the impact mechanism of environmental perception of stadium landscapes on sustainable spectatorship willingness from the perspective of embodied cognition: based on the experience model of "body-environment" interaction. Does AI communication strategy matter for health persuasion? Comparing three archetypes in visual health education. Self-compassion and music performance anxiety: the mediating role of fear of negative evaluation and the moderating role of psychological resilience. From anxiety to innovation: the effect of perceived involution on digital creativity via the parallel mediation of relative deprivation and constructive deviance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1