共同设计改善农村社区饮食的干预措施。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Proceedings of the Nutrition Society Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1017/S0029665125000060
Cindy Needham, Stephanie R Partridge, Laura Alston, Jonathan C Rawstorn, Katherine M Livingstone
{"title":"共同设计改善农村社区饮食的干预措施。","authors":"Cindy Needham, Stephanie R Partridge, Laura Alston, Jonathan C Rawstorn, Katherine M Livingstone","doi":"10.1017/S0029665125000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By involving stakeholders to identify issues, co-design facilitates the creation of solutions aligned with the community's unique needs and values. However, genuine co-design with consumers across all stages of nutrition intervention research remains uncommon. The aim of this review was to examine notable examples of interventions to improve diets in rural settings that have been co-designed by rural communities. Six studies were identified reporting on community-based and digital interventions to improve diets in rural settings that have been co-designed by rural communities. The level of co-design used varied, with two interventions describing co-design workshops and focus groups over a period of between 6 and 11 months, and others not reporting details on the co-design process. Collectively, most interventions demonstrated positive impacts on dietary markers, including an increase in purchase of fruit and vegetable, an increase in percentage energy from nutrient dense foods and a decrease in intake of high fat meats. While these interventions show promise for improving diets in these under-served communities, it is widely recognised that there is a lack of dietary interventions genuinely co-designed with and for rural communities. Future research should build on these studies to co-design dietary interventions that integrate the benefits of both community-based and digital interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing interventions to improve diets in rural communities.\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Needham, Stephanie R Partridge, Laura Alston, Jonathan C Rawstorn, Katherine M Livingstone\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0029665125000060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>By involving stakeholders to identify issues, co-design facilitates the creation of solutions aligned with the community's unique needs and values. However, genuine co-design with consumers across all stages of nutrition intervention research remains uncommon. The aim of this review was to examine notable examples of interventions to improve diets in rural settings that have been co-designed by rural communities. Six studies were identified reporting on community-based and digital interventions to improve diets in rural settings that have been co-designed by rural communities. The level of co-design used varied, with two interventions describing co-design workshops and focus groups over a period of between 6 and 11 months, and others not reporting details on the co-design process. Collectively, most interventions demonstrated positive impacts on dietary markers, including an increase in purchase of fruit and vegetable, an increase in percentage energy from nutrient dense foods and a decrease in intake of high fat meats. While these interventions show promise for improving diets in these under-served communities, it is widely recognised that there is a lack of dietary interventions genuinely co-designed with and for rural communities. Future research should build on these studies to co-design dietary interventions that integrate the benefits of both community-based and digital interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665125000060\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665125000060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过让利益相关者参与识别问题,协同设计促进了与社区独特需求和价值观相一致的解决方案的创建。然而,在营养干预研究的所有阶段与消费者真正的共同设计仍然不常见。本综述的目的是研究由农村社区共同设计的改善农村饮食的干预措施的显著例子。确定了六项研究,报告了由农村社区共同设计的以社区为基础的数字干预措施,以改善农村地区的饮食。使用的共同设计水平各不相同,有两个干预描述了6到11个月期间的共同设计研讨会和焦点小组,而其他干预没有报告共同设计过程的细节。总的来说,大多数干预措施显示出对饮食指标的积极影响,包括增加水果和蔬菜的购买,增加来自营养密集食物的能量百分比,减少摄入高脂肪肉类。虽然这些干预措施有望改善这些服务不足社区的饮食,但人们普遍认为,缺乏真正与农村社区共同设计并针对农村社区的饮食干预措施。未来的研究应以这些研究为基础,共同设计饮食干预措施,将社区干预措施和数字干预措施的好处结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-designing interventions to improve diets in rural communities.

By involving stakeholders to identify issues, co-design facilitates the creation of solutions aligned with the community's unique needs and values. However, genuine co-design with consumers across all stages of nutrition intervention research remains uncommon. The aim of this review was to examine notable examples of interventions to improve diets in rural settings that have been co-designed by rural communities. Six studies were identified reporting on community-based and digital interventions to improve diets in rural settings that have been co-designed by rural communities. The level of co-design used varied, with two interventions describing co-design workshops and focus groups over a period of between 6 and 11 months, and others not reporting details on the co-design process. Collectively, most interventions demonstrated positive impacts on dietary markers, including an increase in purchase of fruit and vegetable, an increase in percentage energy from nutrient dense foods and a decrease in intake of high fat meats. While these interventions show promise for improving diets in these under-served communities, it is widely recognised that there is a lack of dietary interventions genuinely co-designed with and for rural communities. Future research should build on these studies to co-design dietary interventions that integrate the benefits of both community-based and digital interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Dysregulated gut hormone responses to nutrient ingestion in older adults with low appetite: a mechanism of anorexia of ageing. Feeding the Youngest in Crises: Infant and Young Child Feeding Preparedness in High-Income Setting. Gut-Brain Communication in Menopause: Insights into Neuroendocrine and Microbiome Interactions. Appetite for change - The need to revisit malnutrition screening and assessment in oncology. Nutrition in Cancer Survivorship - Bridging the Evidence-Practice Gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1