虚拟击剑与传统击剑的经济基础

Rangelands Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.006

Dana L. Hoag , Ryan Reuter , Daniel F. Mooney , Jeff Vitale , John Ritten , Nathan DeLay , Paul H. Evangelista , Anthony Vorster

{"title":"虚拟击剑与传统击剑的经济基础","authors":"Dana L. Hoag , Ryan Reuter , Daniel F. Mooney , Jeff Vitale , John Ritten , Nathan DeLay , Paul H. Evangelista , Anthony Vorster","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Virtual fencing (VF) for livestock is being commercialized by several companies in the United States.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Ranchers and land managers are interested in the potential benefits of VF but have reservations about its cost.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Cost structures of VF systems vary and are different from physical fencing, making direct comparisons difficult.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We explore relevant costs and outline scenarios where VF systems are likely to be cost effective.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We discuss practical considerations for livestock producers and rangeland managers who are considering adopting VF.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 92-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic fundamentals of virtual fencing compared to traditional fencing\",\"authors\":\"Dana L. Hoag , Ryan Reuter , Daniel F. Mooney , Jeff Vitale , John Ritten , Nathan DeLay , Paul H. Evangelista , Anthony Vorster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Virtual fencing (VF) for livestock is being commercialized by several companies in the United States.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Ranchers and land managers are interested in the potential benefits of VF but have reservations about its cost.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Cost structures of VF systems vary and are different from physical fencing, making direct comparisons difficult.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We explore relevant costs and outline scenarios where VF systems are likely to be cost effective.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>We discuss practical considerations for livestock producers and rangeland managers who are considering adopting VF.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangelands\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 92-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangelands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

•美国几家公司正在将家畜虚拟围栏（VF）商业化。•牧场主和土地管理者对VF的潜在收益感兴趣，但对其成本持保留态度。VF系统的成本结构各不相同，与物理围栏不同，因此很难进行直接比较。•我们探讨了相关成本，并概述了VF系统可能具有成本效益的场景。•我们讨论了考虑采用VF的牲畜生产者和牧场管理者的实际考虑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The economic fundamentals of virtual fencing compared to traditional fencing

•
Virtual fencing (VF) for livestock is being commercialized by several companies in the United States.
•
Ranchers and land managers are interested in the potential benefits of VF but have reservations about its cost.
•
Cost structures of VF systems vary and are different from physical fencing, making direct comparisons difficult.
•
We explore relevant costs and outline scenarios where VF systems are likely to be cost effective.
•
We discuss practical considerations for livestock producers and rangeland managers who are considering adopting VF.