追踪莫桑比克手工和小规模采矿工作正规化的性别和分类方面

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105507
Blair Rutherford , Doris Buss , João Carlos Colaço
{"title":"追踪莫桑比克手工和小规模采矿工作正规化的性别和分类方面","authors":"Blair Rutherford ,&nbsp;Doris Buss ,&nbsp;João Carlos Colaço","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many formalization of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) policies in Africa emphasize increasing tenure security through mining titles and the mandatory creation of cooperatives. These are promoted as a means of poverty-alleviation, reducing environmental harms, and ensuring community benefits, which could include the empowerment of women. Drawing from research conducted in gold ASM areas in Manica, Mozambique together with analyses of transnational law and policy on miners’ cooperatives and ASM formalization interventions, this paper examines how these efforts have expressed significant gendered and class inequities. It analyses how the authority and control rights of the associations/cooperatives privilege men who are local political or economic leaders, which in one case was widely celebrated as an early and leading example of the benefits of formalization. The result, we find, was reduced access to gold mining livelihoods for women. Our analysis underscores the importance of examining who actually receives control rights in formalization efforts and how these are gendered and classed in practice, rather than assuming the declared collective benefits such as gender empowerment will emerge from them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 105507"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing gendered and classed dimension of formalization of artisanal and small-scale mining efforts in Mozambique\",\"authors\":\"Blair Rutherford ,&nbsp;Doris Buss ,&nbsp;João Carlos Colaço\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many formalization of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) policies in Africa emphasize increasing tenure security through mining titles and the mandatory creation of cooperatives. These are promoted as a means of poverty-alleviation, reducing environmental harms, and ensuring community benefits, which could include the empowerment of women. Drawing from research conducted in gold ASM areas in Manica, Mozambique together with analyses of transnational law and policy on miners’ cooperatives and ASM formalization interventions, this paper examines how these efforts have expressed significant gendered and class inequities. It analyses how the authority and control rights of the associations/cooperatives privilege men who are local political or economic leaders, which in one case was widely celebrated as an early and leading example of the benefits of formalization. The result, we find, was reduced access to gold mining livelihoods for women. Our analysis underscores the importance of examining who actually receives control rights in formalization efforts and how these are gendered and classed in practice, rather than assuming the declared collective benefits such as gender empowerment will emerge from them.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000492\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非洲许多手工业和小规模采矿政策的正规化强调通过采矿权和强制性建立合作社来增加保有权的保障。这些活动被视为减轻贫困、减少环境危害和确保社区利益的手段,其中可能包括赋予妇女权力。根据在莫桑比克马尼卡黄金ASM地区进行的研究,以及对矿工合作社和ASM正规化干预的跨国法律和政策的分析,本文考察了这些努力如何表现出重大的性别和阶级不平等。它分析了协会/合作社的权威和控制权如何使地方政治或经济领导人享有特权,这在一个案例中被广泛认为是形式化好处的早期和主要例子。结果,我们发现,减少了妇女获得采金生计的机会。我们的分析强调了检查谁在正规化工作中实际获得控制权的重要性,以及这些权利在实践中如何被性别化和分类,而不是假设宣称的集体利益(如性别赋权)将从中产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tracing gendered and classed dimension of formalization of artisanal and small-scale mining efforts in Mozambique
Many formalization of artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) policies in Africa emphasize increasing tenure security through mining titles and the mandatory creation of cooperatives. These are promoted as a means of poverty-alleviation, reducing environmental harms, and ensuring community benefits, which could include the empowerment of women. Drawing from research conducted in gold ASM areas in Manica, Mozambique together with analyses of transnational law and policy on miners’ cooperatives and ASM formalization interventions, this paper examines how these efforts have expressed significant gendered and class inequities. It analyses how the authority and control rights of the associations/cooperatives privilege men who are local political or economic leaders, which in one case was widely celebrated as an early and leading example of the benefits of formalization. The result, we find, was reduced access to gold mining livelihoods for women. Our analysis underscores the importance of examining who actually receives control rights in formalization efforts and how these are gendered and classed in practice, rather than assuming the declared collective benefits such as gender empowerment will emerge from them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Mining expansion and intimate partner violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a difference-in-differences analysis of disaggregated violence types Explaining and predicting conditional volatility in lithium markets: Climate policy uncertainty, supply chain stress, and hybrid modeling Productivity spillovers. Offshore petroleum as Norway's Space Race? Exploring the community's adaptive preferences in sustainable post-mining development Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst for governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability in resource-dependent contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1