面向异构交通事故数据分析的集成特征选择算法

IF 7.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Knowledge-Based Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113089
Alimul Rajee , Md. Shahriare Satu , Mohammad Zoynul Abedin , K.M. Akkas Ali , Saad Aloteibi , Mohammad Ali Moni
{"title":"面向异构交通事故数据分析的集成特征选择算法","authors":"Alimul Rajee ,&nbsp;Md. Shahriare Satu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Zoynul Abedin ,&nbsp;K.M. Akkas Ali ,&nbsp;Saad Aloteibi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Moni","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traffic accidents are unexpected incidents where one or multiple vehicles collide and damage properties, dying or injuring many individuals. It causes significant social burdens, including loss of life, serious injuries, and economic suppression from medical costs, property damages, and productivity losses. This kind of incident brings a miserable situation for the affected people. Many factors, including infrastructure, weather, vehicles, or driver-related issues, contribute to happening traffic accidents. This work explores an innovative approach by investigating contributing factors to ensure road safety. In this study, an ensemble machine learning model, namely Weighted Fusion-Based Feature Selection (WFFS), was proposed to identify different significant features to reduce the effects of traffic accidents. A large amount of traffic accident records from the United Kingdom (UK) were gathered and split into several folds, which were cleaned and balanced using different techniques such as removing percentages, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and random oversampling. Then, WFFS were employed in each fold and identified the most significant features to predict traffic accident severity more accurately. Different classifiers, such as tree-based, bagging, boosting, and voting classifiers, were implemented into WFFS-generated feature subsets and performed better than primary data and other feature subsets. In this case, the random tree-based bagging method provided the highest accuracy of 97.28% to predict accident severity for the WFFS subset, where its number of features is 18. However, different classifiers achieved better accuracies for 6 out of 11 times using WFFS. This method is highly recommended for policymakers and transportation engineers to identify potentially hazardous locations and take appropriate measures to diminish the effects of traffic accidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49939,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge-Based Systems","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 113089"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WFFS—An ensemble feature selection algorithm for heterogeneous traffic accident data analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alimul Rajee ,&nbsp;Md. Shahriare Satu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Zoynul Abedin ,&nbsp;K.M. Akkas Ali ,&nbsp;Saad Aloteibi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Moni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traffic accidents are unexpected incidents where one or multiple vehicles collide and damage properties, dying or injuring many individuals. It causes significant social burdens, including loss of life, serious injuries, and economic suppression from medical costs, property damages, and productivity losses. This kind of incident brings a miserable situation for the affected people. Many factors, including infrastructure, weather, vehicles, or driver-related issues, contribute to happening traffic accidents. This work explores an innovative approach by investigating contributing factors to ensure road safety. In this study, an ensemble machine learning model, namely Weighted Fusion-Based Feature Selection (WFFS), was proposed to identify different significant features to reduce the effects of traffic accidents. A large amount of traffic accident records from the United Kingdom (UK) were gathered and split into several folds, which were cleaned and balanced using different techniques such as removing percentages, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and random oversampling. Then, WFFS were employed in each fold and identified the most significant features to predict traffic accident severity more accurately. Different classifiers, such as tree-based, bagging, boosting, and voting classifiers, were implemented into WFFS-generated feature subsets and performed better than primary data and other feature subsets. In this case, the random tree-based bagging method provided the highest accuracy of 97.28% to predict accident severity for the WFFS subset, where its number of features is 18. However, different classifiers achieved better accuracies for 6 out of 11 times using WFFS. This method is highly recommended for policymakers and transportation engineers to identify potentially hazardous locations and take appropriate measures to diminish the effects of traffic accidents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"311 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705125001364\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705125001364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通事故是指一辆或多辆汽车发生碰撞,造成财产损失,造成多人伤亡的意外事件。它造成重大的社会负担,包括生命损失、严重伤害以及医疗费用、财产损失和生产力损失造成的经济抑制。这种事件给受灾人民带来了悲惨的处境。许多因素,包括基础设施、天气、车辆或驾驶员相关问题,都会导致交通事故的发生。这项工作通过调查有助于确保道路安全的因素,探索了一种创新方法。在本研究中,提出了一种基于加权融合的集成机器学习模型,即基于加权融合的特征选择(WFFS),以识别不同的重要特征,以减少交通事故的影响。收集了大量来自英国的交通事故记录,并将其分成几份,使用不同的技术(如去除百分比、合成少数过采样技术(SMOTE)和随机过采样)对其进行清理和平衡。然后,在每个折叠中使用WFFS来识别最显著的特征,以更准确地预测交通事故的严重程度。不同的分类器(如基于树的、袋装的、增强的和投票的分类器)被实现到wffs生成的特征子集中,并且比原始数据和其他特征子集表现得更好。在这种情况下,基于随机树的套袋方法对WFFS子集的事故严重性预测准确率最高,达到97.28%,其中WFFS子集的特征数量为18个。然而,不同的分类器在使用WFFS的11次中有6次获得了更好的准确性。强烈建议决策者和交通工程师使用这种方法来识别潜在的危险地点,并采取适当的措施来减少交通事故的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WFFS—An ensemble feature selection algorithm for heterogeneous traffic accident data analysis
Traffic accidents are unexpected incidents where one or multiple vehicles collide and damage properties, dying or injuring many individuals. It causes significant social burdens, including loss of life, serious injuries, and economic suppression from medical costs, property damages, and productivity losses. This kind of incident brings a miserable situation for the affected people. Many factors, including infrastructure, weather, vehicles, or driver-related issues, contribute to happening traffic accidents. This work explores an innovative approach by investigating contributing factors to ensure road safety. In this study, an ensemble machine learning model, namely Weighted Fusion-Based Feature Selection (WFFS), was proposed to identify different significant features to reduce the effects of traffic accidents. A large amount of traffic accident records from the United Kingdom (UK) were gathered and split into several folds, which were cleaned and balanced using different techniques such as removing percentages, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and random oversampling. Then, WFFS were employed in each fold and identified the most significant features to predict traffic accident severity more accurately. Different classifiers, such as tree-based, bagging, boosting, and voting classifiers, were implemented into WFFS-generated feature subsets and performed better than primary data and other feature subsets. In this case, the random tree-based bagging method provided the highest accuracy of 97.28% to predict accident severity for the WFFS subset, where its number of features is 18. However, different classifiers achieved better accuracies for 6 out of 11 times using WFFS. This method is highly recommended for policymakers and transportation engineers to identify potentially hazardous locations and take appropriate measures to diminish the effects of traffic accidents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Knowledge-Based Systems
Knowledge-Based Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1245
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: Knowledge-Based Systems, an international and interdisciplinary journal in artificial intelligence, publishes original, innovative, and creative research results in the field. It focuses on knowledge-based and other artificial intelligence techniques-based systems. The journal aims to support human prediction and decision-making through data science and computation techniques, provide a balanced coverage of theory and practical study, and encourage the development and implementation of knowledge-based intelligence models, methods, systems, and software tools. Applications in business, government, education, engineering, and healthcare are emphasized.
期刊最新文献
LOGIC-AD: Cross-domain zero-shot anomaly detection via logit-space consistency Collaborative knowledge and personalized preference alignment for sequential recommendation Sequence-level watermarking for large language models Geometry knowledge-embedded self-supervised deep monocular visual odometry for autonomous driving Multi-scene topic-aware for novel single continuous shot multiple scenes endoscopy report generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1