Peng Deng , Zhangxin Chen , Xiaolong Peng , Suyang Zhu , Benjieming Liu , Xuantong Lei , Chaojie Di
{"title":"地下天然气储氢:优势、挑战和经济性综述","authors":"Peng Deng , Zhangxin Chen , Xiaolong Peng , Suyang Zhu , Benjieming Liu , Xuantong Lei , Chaojie Di","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the natural gas era, an underground gas storage capacity of more than 10 trillion cubic feet has been developed globally. However, as the global energy demand shifts toward hydrogen, the potential for repurposing these storage facilities for hydrogen has not been systematically investigated. In the hydrogen era, failing to utilize this substantial volume could result in significant resource wastage. This study systematically analyzes the feasibility of Converting Underground Gas Storage (CUGS) for hydrogen for the first time. We establish a new conceptual framework by carefully exploring the reuse potential of surface facilities and evaluating the effects of reservoir environment changes. Based on these analyses, we summarize the advantages and challenges of this technical framework. In addition, an economic assessment is conducted by comparing the CUGS route with the traditional method of Converting Depleted Gas Reservoirs (CDGR) for hydrogen storage. Our results show that the CUGS route will face significant challenges, including water intrusion, geochemical reactions, leakage, and potential integrity damage. Nevertheless, it remains a rapid, stable, and low-cost method for underground hydrogen storage. In particular, our findings indicate that it can increase economic benefits by 3.1 times compared to the traditional CDGR route. Such evidence suggests that the CUGS route offers a large-scale, stable, and economical option for underground hydrogen storage, while also avoiding the abandonment of existing underground natural gas storage facilities in a future hydrogen-oriented society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115438"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Converting underground natural gas storage for hydrogen: A review of advantages, challenges and economics\",\"authors\":\"Peng Deng , Zhangxin Chen , Xiaolong Peng , Suyang Zhu , Benjieming Liu , Xuantong Lei , Chaojie Di\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the natural gas era, an underground gas storage capacity of more than 10 trillion cubic feet has been developed globally. However, as the global energy demand shifts toward hydrogen, the potential for repurposing these storage facilities for hydrogen has not been systematically investigated. In the hydrogen era, failing to utilize this substantial volume could result in significant resource wastage. This study systematically analyzes the feasibility of Converting Underground Gas Storage (CUGS) for hydrogen for the first time. We establish a new conceptual framework by carefully exploring the reuse potential of surface facilities and evaluating the effects of reservoir environment changes. Based on these analyses, we summarize the advantages and challenges of this technical framework. In addition, an economic assessment is conducted by comparing the CUGS route with the traditional method of Converting Depleted Gas Reservoirs (CDGR) for hydrogen storage. Our results show that the CUGS route will face significant challenges, including water intrusion, geochemical reactions, leakage, and potential integrity damage. Nevertheless, it remains a rapid, stable, and low-cost method for underground hydrogen storage. In particular, our findings indicate that it can increase economic benefits by 3.1 times compared to the traditional CDGR route. Such evidence suggests that the CUGS route offers a large-scale, stable, and economical option for underground hydrogen storage, while also avoiding the abandonment of existing underground natural gas storage facilities in a future hydrogen-oriented society.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212500111X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212500111X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Converting underground natural gas storage for hydrogen: A review of advantages, challenges and economics
In the natural gas era, an underground gas storage capacity of more than 10 trillion cubic feet has been developed globally. However, as the global energy demand shifts toward hydrogen, the potential for repurposing these storage facilities for hydrogen has not been systematically investigated. In the hydrogen era, failing to utilize this substantial volume could result in significant resource wastage. This study systematically analyzes the feasibility of Converting Underground Gas Storage (CUGS) for hydrogen for the first time. We establish a new conceptual framework by carefully exploring the reuse potential of surface facilities and evaluating the effects of reservoir environment changes. Based on these analyses, we summarize the advantages and challenges of this technical framework. In addition, an economic assessment is conducted by comparing the CUGS route with the traditional method of Converting Depleted Gas Reservoirs (CDGR) for hydrogen storage. Our results show that the CUGS route will face significant challenges, including water intrusion, geochemical reactions, leakage, and potential integrity damage. Nevertheless, it remains a rapid, stable, and low-cost method for underground hydrogen storage. In particular, our findings indicate that it can increase economic benefits by 3.1 times compared to the traditional CDGR route. Such evidence suggests that the CUGS route offers a large-scale, stable, and economical option for underground hydrogen storage, while also avoiding the abandonment of existing underground natural gas storage facilities in a future hydrogen-oriented society.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.