在了解了乳腺癌筛查的利弊后,人们对医疗保健系统的信任度下降了。

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1177/13591053251315383
Tamar Parmet, Grant Yoder, Brad Morse, Joseph Cappella, Marilyn Schapira, Carmen Lewis, Kirsten McCaffery, Heather Smyth, Jolyn Hersch, Laura D Scherer
{"title":"在了解了乳腺癌筛查的利弊后,人们对医疗保健系统的信任度下降了。","authors":"Tamar Parmet, Grant Yoder, Brad Morse, Joseph Cappella, Marilyn Schapira, Carmen Lewis, Kirsten McCaffery, Heather Smyth, Jolyn Hersch, Laura D Scherer","doi":"10.1177/13591053251315383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conflicting health messages negatively impact trust. Breast cancer screening (BCS) is one area of healthcare where conflicting messages are common. We examined whether women's healthcare system trust was impacted after exposure to information about harms and benefits of BCS. We enrolled 497 women into this study. Participants were administered a decision aid (DA) containing information about the harms and benefits of BCS and reported their healthcare system trust pre- and post-DA exposure. We observed a significant decrease in healthcare system trust from pre- to post-DA. This decrease in trust was associated with participants' perception that the message conflicted with their previously held beliefs and not the reactions it elicited. When people receive information about BCS that conflicts with past health messages, they may lose trust in the healthcare system. This underscores the importance of adopting consistent messages about BCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"4091-4097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in the healthcare system declines after exposure to information about the harms and benefits of breast cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Parmet, Grant Yoder, Brad Morse, Joseph Cappella, Marilyn Schapira, Carmen Lewis, Kirsten McCaffery, Heather Smyth, Jolyn Hersch, Laura D Scherer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591053251315383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Conflicting health messages negatively impact trust. Breast cancer screening (BCS) is one area of healthcare where conflicting messages are common. We examined whether women's healthcare system trust was impacted after exposure to information about harms and benefits of BCS. We enrolled 497 women into this study. Participants were administered a decision aid (DA) containing information about the harms and benefits of BCS and reported their healthcare system trust pre- and post-DA exposure. We observed a significant decrease in healthcare system trust from pre- to post-DA. This decrease in trust was associated with participants' perception that the message conflicted with their previously held beliefs and not the reactions it elicited. When people receive information about BCS that conflicts with past health messages, they may lose trust in the healthcare system. This underscores the importance of adopting consistent messages about BCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4091-4097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959195/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251315383\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251315383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相互冲突的健康信息对信任产生负面影响。乳腺癌筛查(BCS)是医疗保健的一个领域,其中相互矛盾的信息是常见的。我们研究了女性对医疗保健系统的信任是否在接触到有关BCS的危害和益处的信息后受到影响。我们招募了497名女性参与这项研究。参与者被给予决策辅助(DA),其中包含有关BCS的危害和益处的信息,并报告他们在DA暴露前后的医疗保健系统信任。我们观察到从da前到da后,医疗保健系统信任度显著下降。这种信任度的下降与参与者认为信息与他们之前的信念相冲突有关,而不是与它所引起的反应有关。当人们收到与过去的健康信息相冲突的BCS信息时,他们可能会对医疗保健系统失去信任。这强调了就BCS采取一致信息的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trust in the healthcare system declines after exposure to information about the harms and benefits of breast cancer screening.

Conflicting health messages negatively impact trust. Breast cancer screening (BCS) is one area of healthcare where conflicting messages are common. We examined whether women's healthcare system trust was impacted after exposure to information about harms and benefits of BCS. We enrolled 497 women into this study. Participants were administered a decision aid (DA) containing information about the harms and benefits of BCS and reported their healthcare system trust pre- and post-DA exposure. We observed a significant decrease in healthcare system trust from pre- to post-DA. This decrease in trust was associated with participants' perception that the message conflicted with their previously held beliefs and not the reactions it elicited. When people receive information about BCS that conflicts with past health messages, they may lose trust in the healthcare system. This underscores the importance of adopting consistent messages about BCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the relationship of spiritual well-being with life satisfaction and medication adherence of individuals with non-communicable diseases. Perceived neighborhood cohesion and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. Analysis of vulnerability and changes in precautionary behavior of individuals in ageing societies during the years of Covid-19 pandemic in Europe. Exposure to information from divergent sources and altruistic behavior in Public Health Emergency: An examination of the mediating roles of public trust, risk uncertainty and self-efficacy. Vaccine hesitancy is anything but homogeneous: The social representations of COVID-19 vaccines among not hesitant and slightly hesitant vaccinated adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1