Reza Ojaghi M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C., Hamid Nessek M.D., Emmitt Hayes M.D., Matthew Macciacchera M.D., Eric Locke M.D., Pardise Elmi B.Sc., Sophie Henke Tarnow B.Sc., Geoffrey Dervin M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Allan Liew M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Michael Pickell M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.
{"title":"内收管阻滞局部浸润镇痛不能减少ACL手术后阿片类药物的使用。","authors":"Reza Ojaghi M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C., Hamid Nessek M.D., Emmitt Hayes M.D., Matthew Macciacchera M.D., Eric Locke M.D., Pardise Elmi B.Sc., Sophie Henke Tarnow B.Sc., Geoffrey Dervin M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Allan Liew M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Michael Pickell M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This propensity-matched cohort study aimed to determine if adding adductor canal block (ACB) to local infiltration analgesia (LIA) reduces immediate postoperative opioid use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and assess variations based on graft type.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed ACL reconstructions performed from 2019 to 2021. Patients were included if they received either LIA alone or a combination of LIA and ACB. Patients were propensity-matched based on demographic and surgical factors, and perioperative opioid consumption was assessed. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on autograft type (hamstring, quadriceps tendon, and bone–patellar tendon–bone).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in intraoperative, postanesthesia care unit, or total perioperative opioid consumption between the ACB + LIA group (27.76 ± 14.01 mg) and the LIA-only group (28.58 ± 12.56 mg). This finding was consistent across all autograft types. However, in the hamstring autograft subgroup, the addition of ACB led to a statistically significant reduction in postanesthesia care unit opioid consumption (30.99 vs 26.45 mg, <em>P</em> = .039), although this difference was not deemed clinically significant. Additionally, the ACB + LIA group experienced a significantly longer mean time to discharge (495 ± 113 minutes) compared to the LIA-only group (463 ± 116 minutes; <em>P</em> = .017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that adding ACB to LIA does not provide additional opioid-sparing benefits in ACL reconstruction, except in patients with hamstring grafts, where the difference observed may not be of clinical significance. The increased discharge time with ACB highlights the need to balance benefits with operational efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective matched comparative case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3382-3389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia Does Not Reduce Postoperative Opioid Use Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Reza Ojaghi M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C., Hamid Nessek M.D., Emmitt Hayes M.D., Matthew Macciacchera M.D., Eric Locke M.D., Pardise Elmi B.Sc., Sophie Henke Tarnow B.Sc., Geoffrey Dervin M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Allan Liew M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Michael Pickell M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This propensity-matched cohort study aimed to determine if adding adductor canal block (ACB) to local infiltration analgesia (LIA) reduces immediate postoperative opioid use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and assess variations based on graft type.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed ACL reconstructions performed from 2019 to 2021. Patients were included if they received either LIA alone or a combination of LIA and ACB. Patients were propensity-matched based on demographic and surgical factors, and perioperative opioid consumption was assessed. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on autograft type (hamstring, quadriceps tendon, and bone–patellar tendon–bone).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed in intraoperative, postanesthesia care unit, or total perioperative opioid consumption between the ACB + LIA group (27.76 ± 14.01 mg) and the LIA-only group (28.58 ± 12.56 mg). This finding was consistent across all autograft types. However, in the hamstring autograft subgroup, the addition of ACB led to a statistically significant reduction in postanesthesia care unit opioid consumption (30.99 vs 26.45 mg, <em>P</em> = .039), although this difference was not deemed clinically significant. Additionally, the ACB + LIA group experienced a significantly longer mean time to discharge (495 ± 113 minutes) compared to the LIA-only group (463 ± 116 minutes; <em>P</em> = .017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that adding ACB to LIA does not provide additional opioid-sparing benefits in ACL reconstruction, except in patients with hamstring grafts, where the difference observed may not be of clinical significance. The increased discharge time with ACB highlights the need to balance benefits with operational efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective matched comparative case series.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3382-3389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074980632500060X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074980632500060X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本倾向匹配队列研究旨在确定在局部浸润镇痛(LIA)中加入内收管阻滞(ACB)是否会减少ACL重建术后立即使用阿片类药物,并评估基于移植物类型的变化。方法:本回顾性研究分析2019年至2021年进行的ACL重建。如果患者单独接受LIA或LIA和ACB的联合治疗,则纳入患者。根据人口统计学和手术因素对患者进行倾向匹配,并评估围手术期阿片类药物的消耗。根据自体移植物类型(腘绳肌、股四头肌肌腱和髌骨-肌腱-骨)进行亚组分析。结果:ACB + LIA组(27.76±14.01 mg)与单独LIA组(28.58±12.56 mg)在术中、麻醉后护理单位(PACU)或围手术期总阿片类药物消耗量均无显著差异。这一发现在所有自体移植物类型中都是一致的。然而,在腘绳肌自体移植物亚组中,ACB的加入导致PACU阿片类药物消耗有统计学意义的减少(30.99 vs. 26.45 mg, p = 0.039),尽管这种差异不被认为具有临床意义。此外,ACB + LIA组的平均放电时间(495±113分钟)明显高于LIA组(463±116分钟);P = 0.017)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在前交叉韧带重建中,将ACB加入LIA并不能提供额外的阿片类药物节约益处,除了腿筋移植患者,在这种情况下观察到的差异可能没有临床意义。ACB增加的排放时间凸显了平衡效益与作业效率的必要性。
Addition of Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia Does Not Reduce Postoperative Opioid Use Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
Purpose
This propensity-matched cohort study aimed to determine if adding adductor canal block (ACB) to local infiltration analgesia (LIA) reduces immediate postoperative opioid use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and assess variations based on graft type.
Methods
This retrospective study analyzed ACL reconstructions performed from 2019 to 2021. Patients were included if they received either LIA alone or a combination of LIA and ACB. Patients were propensity-matched based on demographic and surgical factors, and perioperative opioid consumption was assessed. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on autograft type (hamstring, quadriceps tendon, and bone–patellar tendon–bone).
Results
No significant differences were observed in intraoperative, postanesthesia care unit, or total perioperative opioid consumption between the ACB + LIA group (27.76 ± 14.01 mg) and the LIA-only group (28.58 ± 12.56 mg). This finding was consistent across all autograft types. However, in the hamstring autograft subgroup, the addition of ACB led to a statistically significant reduction in postanesthesia care unit opioid consumption (30.99 vs 26.45 mg, P = .039), although this difference was not deemed clinically significant. Additionally, the ACB + LIA group experienced a significantly longer mean time to discharge (495 ± 113 minutes) compared to the LIA-only group (463 ± 116 minutes; P = .017).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that adding ACB to LIA does not provide additional opioid-sparing benefits in ACL reconstruction, except in patients with hamstring grafts, where the difference observed may not be of clinical significance. The increased discharge time with ACB highlights the need to balance benefits with operational efficiency.
Level of Evidence
Level III, retrospective matched comparative case series.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.