灾后全球供应网络中各地区的经济恢复力:以台风山竹为例

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105275
Zhixiao Zou , Changxiu Cheng , Zhilin Song , Xudong Wu
{"title":"灾后全球供应网络中各地区的经济恢复力:以台风山竹为例","authors":"Zhixiao Zou ,&nbsp;Changxiu Cheng ,&nbsp;Zhilin Song ,&nbsp;Xudong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As disasters increase in frequency and intensity, assessing regional economic resilience has become increasingly crucial. Traditional methods based on weight-related indicators are not robust in capturing the complexities of post-disaster cascading effects. To address this gap, we combine the Acclimate model with a newly developed index to evaluate the economic resilience of regions in the interconnected economic network, which can simulate the recovery of regional economies in the aftermath of disasters. We employ Typhoon Mangkhut as a case study and show that it led to direct economic losses of $2.1 billion in China and a total global production loss of $10.5 billion, nearly five times the direct loss. Regions with higher economic resilience were predominantly located in China's Yangtze River Delta and along the East China Sea coast, while lower resilience regions were in China's northwestern and central areas. In the global economic network, regions with low resilience are those closely linked to China but do not serve core nodes in trade networks. Conversely, developed economies in Europe and East Asia that feature close economic ties with China are revealed to have high economic resilience, mainly because these countries are highly integrated into the global economic network and can shift trade connections to other economic partners. For the United States as another gigantic economy, eastern coastal regions demonstrate greater resilience than central and northern areas due to diversified trade networks. This study reveals the economic resilience of global economic networks after disasters, thereby supporting disaster risk management and regional governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 105275"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic resilience of regions within the global supply network in the aftermath of disaster: A case study of Typhoon Mangkhut\",\"authors\":\"Zhixiao Zou ,&nbsp;Changxiu Cheng ,&nbsp;Zhilin Song ,&nbsp;Xudong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As disasters increase in frequency and intensity, assessing regional economic resilience has become increasingly crucial. Traditional methods based on weight-related indicators are not robust in capturing the complexities of post-disaster cascading effects. To address this gap, we combine the Acclimate model with a newly developed index to evaluate the economic resilience of regions in the interconnected economic network, which can simulate the recovery of regional economies in the aftermath of disasters. We employ Typhoon Mangkhut as a case study and show that it led to direct economic losses of $2.1 billion in China and a total global production loss of $10.5 billion, nearly five times the direct loss. Regions with higher economic resilience were predominantly located in China's Yangtze River Delta and along the East China Sea coast, while lower resilience regions were in China's northwestern and central areas. In the global economic network, regions with low resilience are those closely linked to China but do not serve core nodes in trade networks. Conversely, developed economies in Europe and East Asia that feature close economic ties with China are revealed to have high economic resilience, mainly because these countries are highly integrated into the global economic network and can shift trade connections to other economic partners. For the United States as another gigantic economy, eastern coastal regions demonstrate greater resilience than central and northern areas due to diversified trade networks. This study reveals the economic resilience of global economic networks after disasters, thereby supporting disaster risk management and regional governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925000998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925000998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着灾害频率和强度的增加,评估区域经济恢复能力变得越来越重要。基于权重相关指标的传统方法在捕捉灾后级联效应的复杂性方面不够稳健。为了解决这一差距,我们将Acclimate模型与一个新开发的指数相结合,以评估互联经济网络中区域的经济恢复能力,该指数可以模拟灾害后区域经济的复苏。我们以台风“山竹”为例进行研究,发现它给中国造成了21亿美元的直接经济损失,给全球造成了105亿美元的生产损失,几乎是直接损失的5倍。经济弹性较高的地区主要分布在中国的长江三角洲和东海沿岸,而弹性较低的地区分布在中国的西北部和中部地区。在全球经济网络中,韧性较低的地区是那些与中国联系密切但不服务于贸易网络核心节点的地区。相反,与中国经济联系密切的欧洲和东亚发达经济体显示出较高的经济弹性,主要是因为这些国家高度融入全球经济网络,可以将贸易联系转移到其他经济伙伴。美国作为另一个庞大的经济体,由于贸易网络的多样化,东部沿海地区比中部和北部地区表现出更大的弹性。本研究揭示了灾害后全球经济网络的经济弹性,从而为灾害风险管理和区域治理提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic resilience of regions within the global supply network in the aftermath of disaster: A case study of Typhoon Mangkhut
As disasters increase in frequency and intensity, assessing regional economic resilience has become increasingly crucial. Traditional methods based on weight-related indicators are not robust in capturing the complexities of post-disaster cascading effects. To address this gap, we combine the Acclimate model with a newly developed index to evaluate the economic resilience of regions in the interconnected economic network, which can simulate the recovery of regional economies in the aftermath of disasters. We employ Typhoon Mangkhut as a case study and show that it led to direct economic losses of $2.1 billion in China and a total global production loss of $10.5 billion, nearly five times the direct loss. Regions with higher economic resilience were predominantly located in China's Yangtze River Delta and along the East China Sea coast, while lower resilience regions were in China's northwestern and central areas. In the global economic network, regions with low resilience are those closely linked to China but do not serve core nodes in trade networks. Conversely, developed economies in Europe and East Asia that feature close economic ties with China are revealed to have high economic resilience, mainly because these countries are highly integrated into the global economic network and can shift trade connections to other economic partners. For the United States as another gigantic economy, eastern coastal regions demonstrate greater resilience than central and northern areas due to diversified trade networks. This study reveals the economic resilience of global economic networks after disasters, thereby supporting disaster risk management and regional governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
From prediction to decision: An explainable AI framework for Urban ground subsidence risk management When wildfires reward incumbents: Risk exposure and electoral accountability in Chile Where do evacuees go? Understanding evacuation destinations in Georgia during Hurricane Milton The influence of builders on seismic strengthening of housing Efficacy of prompt evacuation and route selection for tsunamis considering building collapse: A case study of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1