Xiao Tang, Yan-Mei Gu, Yuan Shi, Zhi-Ming Li, Rui Cao, Sheng-Gui Lu, Yan-Bin Wu, Yun-Feng Tao, Zi-Yan Sun, Yong-Jie Yin, Cheng-Yi Liu, Xiao-Bin Tang, Gui-Fen Gan, Xue-Jun Qin, Dong Yin, Hong-Bin Zhao, Cheng-Ying Liu, Lei Zhang, Ping Fang, Ling-Shuang Du, Li Li, Hai Tan, Meng Li, Ying-Ting Zuo, Bing Sun
{"title":"改良袖带泄漏试验预测有创机械通气患者再插管风险:一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。","authors":"Xiao Tang, Yan-Mei Gu, Yuan Shi, Zhi-Ming Li, Rui Cao, Sheng-Gui Lu, Yan-Bin Wu, Yun-Feng Tao, Zi-Yan Sun, Yong-Jie Yin, Cheng-Yi Liu, Xiao-Bin Tang, Gui-Fen Gan, Xue-Jun Qin, Dong Yin, Hong-Bin Zhao, Cheng-Ying Liu, Lei Zhang, Ping Fang, Ling-Shuang Du, Li Li, Hai Tan, Meng Li, Ying-Ting Zuo, Bing Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cuff leak test (CLT) is an important tool to assess the risk of upper airway obstruction after extubation.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does a modified CLT approach have superior ability in predicting reintubation compared with the traditional method?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The primary end point was the incidence of the need for reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Secondary end points included, among others, the actual incidence of reintubation, the incidence of postextubation stridor (PES), and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 536 patients were randomized to either the modified CLT group (n = 268) or the control group (n = 268). The incidence of reintubation within 48 hours of extubation did not differ between the groups. PES within 24 hours of extubation was more frequent in the modified CLT group than in the control group (5.22% vs 1.49%; OR, 0.275 [95% CI, 0.089-0.846]; P = .028). The IMV duration was shorter in the modified CLT group than in the control group (137 hours [74, 218] vs 159 hours [95, 252]; OR, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.000-1.002]; P = .046). In the patients with IMV duration ≥ 6 days, the incidence of PES was 2.95% in the modified CLT group and 0.74% in the control group (OR, 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975]; P = .048).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Compared with the control group, the modified CLT approach might better predict PES within 24 hours of extubation, especially for patients with IMV duration longer than 6 days, but it was not shown to decrease the reintubation incidence and mortality.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05550220; URL: clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"119-130"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Cuff Leak Test for Predicting the Risk of Reintubation in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Anonymized, Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Tang, Yan-Mei Gu, Yuan Shi, Zhi-Ming Li, Rui Cao, Sheng-Gui Lu, Yan-Bin Wu, Yun-Feng Tao, Zi-Yan Sun, Yong-Jie Yin, Cheng-Yi Liu, Xiao-Bin Tang, Gui-Fen Gan, Xue-Jun Qin, Dong Yin, Hong-Bin Zhao, Cheng-Ying Liu, Lei Zhang, Ping Fang, Ling-Shuang Du, Li Li, Hai Tan, Meng Li, Ying-Ting Zuo, Bing Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cuff leak test (CLT) is an important tool to assess the risk of upper airway obstruction after extubation.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does a modified CLT approach have superior ability in predicting reintubation compared with the traditional method?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The primary end point was the incidence of the need for reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Secondary end points included, among others, the actual incidence of reintubation, the incidence of postextubation stridor (PES), and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 536 patients were randomized to either the modified CLT group (n = 268) or the control group (n = 268). The incidence of reintubation within 48 hours of extubation did not differ between the groups. PES within 24 hours of extubation was more frequent in the modified CLT group than in the control group (5.22% vs 1.49%; OR, 0.275 [95% CI, 0.089-0.846]; P = .028). The IMV duration was shorter in the modified CLT group than in the control group (137 hours [74, 218] vs 159 hours [95, 252]; OR, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.000-1.002]; P = .046). In the patients with IMV duration ≥ 6 days, the incidence of PES was 2.95% in the modified CLT group and 0.74% in the control group (OR, 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975]; P = .048).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Compared with the control group, the modified CLT approach might better predict PES within 24 hours of extubation, especially for patients with IMV duration longer than 6 days, but it was not shown to decrease the reintubation incidence and mortality.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05550220; URL: clinicaltrials.gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:袖带泄漏试验(CLT)是评估拔管后上气道阻塞风险的重要工具。研究问题:改良的CLT方法在预测再插管方面是否优于传统方法?研究设计和方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。主要终点是拔管后48小时内需要重新插管的发生率。次要终点为实际再插管发生率、拔管后喘鸣发生率、有创机械通气时间等。结果:536例患者随机分为改良CLT组(n = 268)和对照组(n = 268)。拔管后48 h内再插管的发生率在两组间无差异。改良CLT组拔管后24 h内PES发生率高于对照组(5.22% vs. 1.49%;或0.275 [95% ci, 0.089-0.846];P = 0.028)。改良CLT组的IMV持续时间短于对照组(137 h[74,218]对159 h [95,252]);或1.001 [95% ci, 1.000-1.002], p = 0.046)。在IMV持续时间≥6天的患者中,改良CLT组PES发生率为2.95%,对照组为0.74% (OR 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975], P = 0.048)。结论:与对照组相比,改良的CLT方法可以更好地预测拔管后24 h内的PES,特别是对于IMV持续时间大于6天的患者,但无助于降低再插管发生率和死亡率。临床试验:GOV: NCT05550220,注册于2022年9月19日。
Modified Cuff Leak Test for Predicting the Risk of Reintubation in Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Anonymized, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: The cuff leak test (CLT) is an important tool to assess the risk of upper airway obstruction after extubation.
Research question: Does a modified CLT approach have superior ability in predicting reintubation compared with the traditional method?
Study design and methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The primary end point was the incidence of the need for reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Secondary end points included, among others, the actual incidence of reintubation, the incidence of postextubation stridor (PES), and the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
Results: A total of 536 patients were randomized to either the modified CLT group (n = 268) or the control group (n = 268). The incidence of reintubation within 48 hours of extubation did not differ between the groups. PES within 24 hours of extubation was more frequent in the modified CLT group than in the control group (5.22% vs 1.49%; OR, 0.275 [95% CI, 0.089-0.846]; P = .028). The IMV duration was shorter in the modified CLT group than in the control group (137 hours [74, 218] vs 159 hours [95, 252]; OR, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.000-1.002]; P = .046). In the patients with IMV duration ≥ 6 days, the incidence of PES was 2.95% in the modified CLT group and 0.74% in the control group (OR, 0.203 [95% CI, 0.042-0.975]; P = .048).
Interpretation: Compared with the control group, the modified CLT approach might better predict PES within 24 hours of extubation, especially for patients with IMV duration longer than 6 days, but it was not shown to decrease the reintubation incidence and mortality.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.