常规侵入性治疗对老年人虚弱和非st段抬高型心肌梗死再梗死风险的影响:一项随机临床试验的亚分析

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254
Juan Sanchis, Hector Bueno, David Martí Sánchez, Manuel Martinez-Selles, Pablo Díez Villanueva, Jose A Barrabes, Francisco Marín, Adolfo Villa, Marcelo Sanmartin Fernandez, Cinta Llibre, Alessandro Sionis, Jaime Elizaga, Fernando Alfonso, Eduardo Nuñez, Julio Núñez, Vijay Kunadian, Albert Ariza-Solé
{"title":"常规侵入性治疗对老年人虚弱和非st段抬高型心肌梗死再梗死风险的影响:一项随机临床试验的亚分析","authors":"Juan Sanchis, Hector Bueno, David Martí Sánchez, Manuel Martinez-Selles, Pablo Díez Villanueva, Jose A Barrabes, Francisco Marín, Adolfo Villa, Marcelo Sanmartin Fernandez, Cinta Llibre, Alessandro Sionis, Jaime Elizaga, Fernando Alfonso, Eduardo Nuñez, Julio Núñez, Vijay Kunadian, Albert Ariza-Solé","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03208153.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":"786-792"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of routine invasive management on reinfarction risk in older adults with frailty and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of a randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Sanchis, Hector Bueno, David Martí Sánchez, Manuel Martinez-Selles, Pablo Díez Villanueva, Jose A Barrabes, Francisco Marín, Adolfo Villa, Marcelo Sanmartin Fernandez, Cinta Llibre, Alessandro Sionis, Jaime Elizaga, Fernando Alfonso, Eduardo Nuñez, Julio Núñez, Vijay Kunadian, Albert Ariza-Solé\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03208153.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"786-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床试验和荟萃分析表明,对老年非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行侵入性治疗可降低再梗死风险。这项研究调查了是否可以在虚弱的患者中观察到类似的益处。方法:coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo -虚弱(mosca -虚弱)试验包括167名年龄≥70岁、虚弱(临床虚弱量表≥4分)和NSTEMI的成年人,他们在住院期间随机分为侵入性(n=84)和保守性(n=83)两组。该亚分析的主要终点是再梗死,考虑到全因死亡率是一个竞争事件,中位随访3年。考虑第一次再梗死的时间和所有再梗死(首次和复发)。子研究没有预先指定。结果:总死亡人数(93.56%)超过首次再梗死死亡人数(32.19%)。当将死亡作为竞争风险考虑时,侵入性治疗不影响再梗死风险(亚分布HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 ~ 1.40, p=0.56)。随着时间的推移,侵入性治疗最初增加的死亡风险(在131天至175天之间显著)转变为较低的死亡风险。共观察到45例再梗死(首次和复发)。纵向轨迹证实,随着时间的推移,有创策略并没有降低再梗死的风险(p=0.72)。然而,死亡率遵循双相模式,侵袭组在前6个月死亡率较高,9个月至3年死亡率降低(整个时间依赖性轨迹p=0.05)。有创策略与保守策略的胜率为1.08 (95% CI 0.72 ~ 1.63, p=0.70)。结论:在3年随访中,对于虚弱和非stemi的老年人,常规侵入性治疗并没有降低再梗死的风险。与虚弱相关的高全因死亡率可能会限制侵入性治疗的效果。由于有限的样本量和II型错误的风险,这些发现应该被认为是假设生成。试验注册号:NCT03208153。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of routine invasive management on reinfarction risk in older adults with frailty and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of a randomised clinical trial.

Background: Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.

Methods: The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.

Results: The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).

Conclusions: In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.

Trial registration number: NCT03208153.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
期刊最新文献
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: a pathway to achieve guideline adherence. Cardiac rehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a whole-population study. Correspondence on 'Updated 5-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low- to intermediate-surgical risk', by Marin-Cuartas et al. Clozapine, cardiotoxicity and the case for permissive risk in psychiatry. Role of coronary microvascular dysfunction in takotsubo syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1