Juan Sanchis, Hector Bueno, David Martí Sánchez, Manuel Martinez-Selles, Pablo Díez Villanueva, Jose A Barrabes, Francisco Marín, Adolfo Villa, Marcelo Sanmartin Fernandez, Cinta Llibre, Alessandro Sionis, Jaime Elizaga, Fernando Alfonso, Eduardo Nuñez, Julio Núñez, Vijay Kunadian, Albert Ariza-Solé
{"title":"常规侵入性治疗对老年人虚弱和非st段抬高型心肌梗死再梗死风险的影响:一项随机临床试验的亚分析","authors":"Juan Sanchis, Hector Bueno, David Martí Sánchez, Manuel Martinez-Selles, Pablo Díez Villanueva, Jose A Barrabes, Francisco Marín, Adolfo Villa, Marcelo Sanmartin Fernandez, Cinta Llibre, Alessandro Sionis, Jaime Elizaga, Fernando Alfonso, Eduardo Nuñez, Julio Núñez, Vijay Kunadian, Albert Ariza-Solé","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03208153.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":"786-792"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of routine invasive management on reinfarction risk in older adults with frailty and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of a randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Sanchis, Hector Bueno, David Martí Sánchez, Manuel Martinez-Selles, Pablo Díez Villanueva, Jose A Barrabes, Francisco Marín, Adolfo Villa, Marcelo Sanmartin Fernandez, Cinta Llibre, Alessandro Sionis, Jaime Elizaga, Fernando Alfonso, Eduardo Nuñez, Julio Núñez, Vijay Kunadian, Albert Ariza-Solé\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03208153.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"786-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:临床试验和荟萃分析表明,对老年非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者进行侵入性治疗可降低再梗死风险。这项研究调查了是否可以在虚弱的患者中观察到类似的益处。方法:coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo -虚弱(mosca -虚弱)试验包括167名年龄≥70岁、虚弱(临床虚弱量表≥4分)和NSTEMI的成年人,他们在住院期间随机分为侵入性(n=84)和保守性(n=83)两组。该亚分析的主要终点是再梗死,考虑到全因死亡率是一个竞争事件,中位随访3年。考虑第一次再梗死的时间和所有再梗死(首次和复发)。子研究没有预先指定。结果:总死亡人数(93.56%)超过首次再梗死死亡人数(32.19%)。当将死亡作为竞争风险考虑时,侵入性治疗不影响再梗死风险(亚分布HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 ~ 1.40, p=0.56)。随着时间的推移,侵入性治疗最初增加的死亡风险(在131天至175天之间显著)转变为较低的死亡风险。共观察到45例再梗死(首次和复发)。纵向轨迹证实,随着时间的推移,有创策略并没有降低再梗死的风险(p=0.72)。然而,死亡率遵循双相模式,侵袭组在前6个月死亡率较高,9个月至3年死亡率降低(整个时间依赖性轨迹p=0.05)。有创策略与保守策略的胜率为1.08 (95% CI 0.72 ~ 1.63, p=0.70)。结论:在3年随访中,对于虚弱和非stemi的老年人,常规侵入性治疗并没有降低再梗死的风险。与虚弱相关的高全因死亡率可能会限制侵入性治疗的效果。由于有限的样本量和II型错误的风险,这些发现应该被认为是假设生成。试验注册号:NCT03208153。
Effects of routine invasive management on reinfarction risk in older adults with frailty and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of a randomised clinical trial.
Background: Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.
Methods: The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.
Results: The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).
Conclusions: In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.
期刊介绍:
Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.