全球尺度下影响火灾后光合活性恢复的因素研究

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113206
Yicheng Shen , I. Colin Prentice , Sandy P. Harrison
{"title":"全球尺度下影响火灾后光合活性恢复的因素研究","authors":"Yicheng Shen ,&nbsp;I. Colin Prentice ,&nbsp;Sandy P. Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The time taken for ecosystems to recover after wildfire affects the rate of carbon sequestration, and this in turn impacts land–atmosphere exchanges and hydrological processes. Factors affecting post-fire recovery time have been investigated at site or regional scale, but there is comparatively little information about this at a global scale. In this study, we use solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to estimate the recovery of photosynthetic activity after fire for more than 10,000 fires representing the range of ecosystems across the globe. We then examined the factors that influence post-fire recovery time, initially using the relaxed lasso technique to identify the most important factors and then using a linear regression model incorporating these factors. We show that vegetation characteristics, the characteristics of the fire, and post-fire climate all influence recovery time. Gross primary production (GPP) is the most important factor, with faster recovery in ecosystems with higher GPP. Fire properties which indicate substantial vegetation damage, such as fire intensity and duration, result in longer recovery times. Post-fire climate also affects recovery time: anomalous temperature and temperature seasonality, and higher than normal dry days increase recovery time while higher-than-average precipitation decreases recovery time. There is an additional impact of vegetation type (biome), which may reflect differences in plant adaptations to fire between biomes. We show that there is a clear relationship between the proportion of plants that resprout after fire in a biome and recovery time, with ecosystems characterised by higher abundance recovering faster.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113206"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of factors that affect post-fire recovery of photosynthetic activity at global scale\",\"authors\":\"Yicheng Shen ,&nbsp;I. Colin Prentice ,&nbsp;Sandy P. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The time taken for ecosystems to recover after wildfire affects the rate of carbon sequestration, and this in turn impacts land–atmosphere exchanges and hydrological processes. Factors affecting post-fire recovery time have been investigated at site or regional scale, but there is comparatively little information about this at a global scale. In this study, we use solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to estimate the recovery of photosynthetic activity after fire for more than 10,000 fires representing the range of ecosystems across the globe. We then examined the factors that influence post-fire recovery time, initially using the relaxed lasso technique to identify the most important factors and then using a linear regression model incorporating these factors. We show that vegetation characteristics, the characteristics of the fire, and post-fire climate all influence recovery time. Gross primary production (GPP) is the most important factor, with faster recovery in ecosystems with higher GPP. Fire properties which indicate substantial vegetation damage, such as fire intensity and duration, result in longer recovery times. Post-fire climate also affects recovery time: anomalous temperature and temperature seasonality, and higher than normal dry days increase recovery time while higher-than-average precipitation decreases recovery time. There is an additional impact of vegetation type (biome), which may reflect differences in plant adaptations to fire between biomes. We show that there is a clear relationship between the proportion of plants that resprout after fire in a biome and recovery time, with ecosystems characterised by higher abundance recovering faster.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001359\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火后生态系统恢复所需的时间会影响碳固存的速度,而这反过来又会影响陆地-大气交换和水文过程。影响火灾后恢复时间的因素已经在现场或区域尺度上进行了调查,但在全球尺度上有关这方面的信息相对较少。在这项研究中,我们使用太阳诱导的叶绿素荧光(SIF)来估计火灾后光合活性的恢复,这些火灾代表了全球生态系统的范围。然后,我们研究了影响火灾后恢复时间的因素,首先使用放松套索技术确定最重要的因素,然后使用包含这些因素的线性回归模型。结果表明,植被特征、火灾特征和火灾后气候都会影响恢复时间。初级生产总值(GPP)是最重要的影响因素,GPP越高的生态系统恢复速度越快。表明植被严重受损的火灾属性,如火灾强度和持续时间,会导致较长的恢复时间。火灾后气候对恢复时间也有影响:异常温度和温度季节性,高于正常的干燥日数增加了恢复时间,而高于平均的降水减少了恢复时间。植被类型(生物群系)还有一个额外的影响,这可能反映了不同生物群系之间植物对火灾的适应差异。我们表明,在生物群系中,火灾后重新发芽的植物比例与恢复时间之间存在明显的关系,丰度较高的生态系统恢复得更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of factors that affect post-fire recovery of photosynthetic activity at global scale
The time taken for ecosystems to recover after wildfire affects the rate of carbon sequestration, and this in turn impacts land–atmosphere exchanges and hydrological processes. Factors affecting post-fire recovery time have been investigated at site or regional scale, but there is comparatively little information about this at a global scale. In this study, we use solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to estimate the recovery of photosynthetic activity after fire for more than 10,000 fires representing the range of ecosystems across the globe. We then examined the factors that influence post-fire recovery time, initially using the relaxed lasso technique to identify the most important factors and then using a linear regression model incorporating these factors. We show that vegetation characteristics, the characteristics of the fire, and post-fire climate all influence recovery time. Gross primary production (GPP) is the most important factor, with faster recovery in ecosystems with higher GPP. Fire properties which indicate substantial vegetation damage, such as fire intensity and duration, result in longer recovery times. Post-fire climate also affects recovery time: anomalous temperature and temperature seasonality, and higher than normal dry days increase recovery time while higher-than-average precipitation decreases recovery time. There is an additional impact of vegetation type (biome), which may reflect differences in plant adaptations to fire between biomes. We show that there is a clear relationship between the proportion of plants that resprout after fire in a biome and recovery time, with ecosystems characterised by higher abundance recovering faster.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
The median survival time of motifs: A novel motif-based indicator reveals the impact of algal blooms on bacterial network interaction stability Disentangling the contributions of hydrothermal factors to fractional vegetation cover dynamics on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau Quantifying the effects of urban agglomeration on cropland ecological efficiency in the Sichuan–Chongqing region, China Thermodynamic Refugia in the Arabian peninsula: the diurnal moisture pulse as a physical Indicator of desert habitability Taxonomic and trait-based approaches for monitoring fine sediment: influence of sediment method, substrate composition, taxonomic resolution and spatial scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1