{"title":"用根管器械评价液压硅酸钙基根管密封器可退性的体外研究。","authors":"Akanksha Malik, Anjali Kothari, Charmi Mehta, Vinay Rao, Kavita Sule, Deep Agrawal, Priyal Patel","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1099_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the retreatability of hydraulic calcium silicate-based (HCSB) and epoxy resin-based sealers in single-rooted mandibular premolars, with a specific focus on sealer remnants and retreatment duration.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Sixty mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared and obturated with BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, or AH Plus. After a one-month period, the gutta-percha was removed and the specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>BioRoot RCS showed the most remnants and longest retreatment time, while AH Plus was the most efficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BioRoot RCS is less favorable for retreatment, with AH Plus being the most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 4","pages":"S3544-S3546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Retreatability of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Using Root Canal Instrumentation-An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Akanksha Malik, Anjali Kothari, Charmi Mehta, Vinay Rao, Kavita Sule, Deep Agrawal, Priyal Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1099_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the retreatability of hydraulic calcium silicate-based (HCSB) and epoxy resin-based sealers in single-rooted mandibular premolars, with a specific focus on sealer remnants and retreatment duration.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Sixty mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared and obturated with BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, or AH Plus. After a one-month period, the gutta-percha was removed and the specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>BioRoot RCS showed the most remnants and longest retreatment time, while AH Plus was the most efficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BioRoot RCS is less favorable for retreatment, with AH Plus being the most effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 Suppl 4\",\"pages\":\"S3544-S3546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1099_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1099_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Retreatability of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Using Root Canal Instrumentation-An In Vitro Study.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the retreatability of hydraulic calcium silicate-based (HCSB) and epoxy resin-based sealers in single-rooted mandibular premolars, with a specific focus on sealer remnants and retreatment duration.
Methodology: Sixty mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared and obturated with BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, or AH Plus. After a one-month period, the gutta-percha was removed and the specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope.
Result: BioRoot RCS showed the most remnants and longest retreatment time, while AH Plus was the most efficient.
Conclusion: BioRoot RCS is less favorable for retreatment, with AH Plus being the most effective.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
