中期(5年)野火对英国泥炭地土壤化学和生物特性的影响

IF 5 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Applied Soil Ecology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105953
Luigi Marfella , Mark A. Ashby , Georgia Hennessy , Jon Rowe , Rossana Marzaioli , Flora A. Rutigliano , Helen C. Glanville
{"title":"中期(5年)野火对英国泥炭地土壤化学和生物特性的影响","authors":"Luigi Marfella ,&nbsp;Mark A. Ashby ,&nbsp;Georgia Hennessy ,&nbsp;Jon Rowe ,&nbsp;Rossana Marzaioli ,&nbsp;Flora A. Rutigliano ,&nbsp;Helen C. Glanville","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peat degradation due to human activities and global change exposes peatlands to increasing fire risk. Given their key ecological role in carbon storage and water filtration, studying fire impacts on a UK peatland is significant in a global context. This study aimed to assess the medium-term impacts of the 2018 wildfire on peatland soil within the Roaches Nature Reserve (UK). To test whether fire effects were still evident five years after the event and whether marginally affected areas exhibited greater soil recovery, several peat characteristics were evaluated in 2023 at increasing distances from the unburnt control area toward the fire's ignition point, in the order S1, S2, S3 and S4. Results confirmed that the fire effect was still evident after five years, showing a significant increase in pH from 3.59 ± 0.04 in control to 3.85 ± 0.03 in burnt peat, a 60 and 70 % reduction in water and organic carbon content compared to control (65.2 ± 1.33 % and 42.9 ± 1.80 %, respectively), up to 85 % reductions in microbial carbon and nitrogen relative to control (2.48 ± 0.12 and 0.17 ± 0.01 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). The observed spatial gradient of fire impact was: S4 ≫ S3 = S1 ≥ S2, only partially confirming the second hypothesis. As expected, S4 site, farther from the unburnt area, exhibited the worst recovery, but S1 site, proximal to the unburnt area, did not show the highest recovery. This is probably due to the variable nature of peatland fire dynamics and post-fire recovery, highlighting the need for more detailed analyses in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 105953"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term (5 years) impacts of wildfire on soil chemical and biological properties in a UK peatland\",\"authors\":\"Luigi Marfella ,&nbsp;Mark A. Ashby ,&nbsp;Georgia Hennessy ,&nbsp;Jon Rowe ,&nbsp;Rossana Marzaioli ,&nbsp;Flora A. Rutigliano ,&nbsp;Helen C. Glanville\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Peat degradation due to human activities and global change exposes peatlands to increasing fire risk. Given their key ecological role in carbon storage and water filtration, studying fire impacts on a UK peatland is significant in a global context. This study aimed to assess the medium-term impacts of the 2018 wildfire on peatland soil within the Roaches Nature Reserve (UK). To test whether fire effects were still evident five years after the event and whether marginally affected areas exhibited greater soil recovery, several peat characteristics were evaluated in 2023 at increasing distances from the unburnt control area toward the fire's ignition point, in the order S1, S2, S3 and S4. Results confirmed that the fire effect was still evident after five years, showing a significant increase in pH from 3.59 ± 0.04 in control to 3.85 ± 0.03 in burnt peat, a 60 and 70 % reduction in water and organic carbon content compared to control (65.2 ± 1.33 % and 42.9 ± 1.80 %, respectively), up to 85 % reductions in microbial carbon and nitrogen relative to control (2.48 ± 0.12 and 0.17 ± 0.01 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). The observed spatial gradient of fire impact was: S4 ≫ S3 = S1 ≥ S2, only partially confirming the second hypothesis. As expected, S4 site, farther from the unburnt area, exhibited the worst recovery, but S1 site, proximal to the unburnt area, did not show the highest recovery. This is probably due to the variable nature of peatland fire dynamics and post-fire recovery, highlighting the need for more detailed analyses in future studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325000915\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325000915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于人类活动和全球变化导致的泥炭退化使泥炭地面临越来越大的火灾风险。鉴于泥炭地在碳储存和水过滤方面的关键生态作用,研究火灾对英国泥炭地的影响在全球范围内具有重要意义。本研究旨在评估2018年野火对蟑螂自然保护区(英国)泥炭地土壤的中期影响。为了测试火灾影响在事件发生五年后是否仍然明显,以及受轻微影响的地区是否表现出更大的土壤恢复,在2023年,从未燃烧控制区到火灾着火点的距离增加,以S1、S2、S3和S4的顺序评估了几种泥炭特征。结果证实,五年后,火焰效果还是明显表现出显著增加在控制pH值从3.59±0.04到3.85±0.03燔泥炭,减少60 - 70%的水和有机碳含量比控制(分别为65.2±1.33%和42.9±1.80%),85%减少微生物碳和氮相对于控制(2.48±0.12,0.17±0.01 g公斤−1,分别)。观测到的火灾冲击空间梯度为:S4 > S3 = S1≥S2,仅部分证实了第二种假设。与预期的一样,离未燃区较远的S4站点恢复最差,而离未燃区较近的S1站点恢复不是最高。这可能是由于泥炭地火灾动态和火灾后恢复的可变性质,强调需要在未来的研究中进行更详细的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mid-term (5 years) impacts of wildfire on soil chemical and biological properties in a UK peatland
Peat degradation due to human activities and global change exposes peatlands to increasing fire risk. Given their key ecological role in carbon storage and water filtration, studying fire impacts on a UK peatland is significant in a global context. This study aimed to assess the medium-term impacts of the 2018 wildfire on peatland soil within the Roaches Nature Reserve (UK). To test whether fire effects were still evident five years after the event and whether marginally affected areas exhibited greater soil recovery, several peat characteristics were evaluated in 2023 at increasing distances from the unburnt control area toward the fire's ignition point, in the order S1, S2, S3 and S4. Results confirmed that the fire effect was still evident after five years, showing a significant increase in pH from 3.59 ± 0.04 in control to 3.85 ± 0.03 in burnt peat, a 60 and 70 % reduction in water and organic carbon content compared to control (65.2 ± 1.33 % and 42.9 ± 1.80 %, respectively), up to 85 % reductions in microbial carbon and nitrogen relative to control (2.48 ± 0.12 and 0.17 ± 0.01 g kg−1, respectively). The observed spatial gradient of fire impact was: S4 ≫ S3 = S1 ≥ S2, only partially confirming the second hypothesis. As expected, S4 site, farther from the unburnt area, exhibited the worst recovery, but S1 site, proximal to the unburnt area, did not show the highest recovery. This is probably due to the variable nature of peatland fire dynamics and post-fire recovery, highlighting the need for more detailed analyses in future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing vineyard soil mycorrhizal properties and grape and wine phenolic profiles through microbial inoculation and interrow green cover Naturalized and commercial Festuca arundinacea populations differ in root biomass, mycorrhizal colonization, and responses to Epichloë symbiosis Derivative-enhanced multispectral sensing improves soil salinity assessment in arid regions Effects of fluoxastrobin on soil health: Assessing the interference on soil microbial ecological function at field microplots Biocrust-forming mosses mediate bacterial community assembly in response to aridity across northern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1