IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1037/xlm0001415
Frances G Cooley, Karen Emmorey, Emily Saunders, Grace Sinclair, Casey Stringer, Elizabeth R Schotter
{"title":"Identifying text-based factors that contribute to the superior reading efficiency of skilled deaf readers: An eye-tracking study of length, frequency, and predictability.","authors":"Frances G Cooley, Karen Emmorey, Emily Saunders, Grace Sinclair, Casey Stringer, Elizabeth R Schotter","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skilled deaf readers are more efficient than their hearing counterparts-they read faster, skipping more words without a negative impact on comprehension. It is not clear from where deaf readers' efficiency derives, because reading is a complex cognitive process that requires readers to extract meaning from text, incorporating visual, lexical, and contextual information. To assess the contributions of these factors to deaf readers' efficiency, we tracked their eye movements as they read sentences with target words that were manipulated for <i>length</i>, <i>frequency</i>, and <i>predictability</i>, and we assessed the effects of those variables on <i>skipping probability</i> (i.e., whether the reader skipped or fixated the target) and <i>gaze duration</i> (i.e., the amount of time spent fixating the word before leaving it) and compared these patterns to hearing readers with equivalent reading comprehension skill. Deaf readers demonstrated increased skipping rates and shorter gaze durations overall compared to hearing readers and exhibited different patterns of word length and predictability effects, but similar frequency effects. Deaf readers' eye movements reflect <i>visual linguistic processing expertise</i> as they are primarily driven by word length when targeting words for fixation, but frequency and predictability effects on word skipping indicate that they do engage in parafoveal linguistic processing. These results emphasize the qualitative differences in reading strategies between deaf and hearing readers and advance our understanding of the impact of early language and sensory experiences on reading behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

熟练的聋人读者比他们的健听读者更有效率--他们的阅读速度更快,跳读的字数更多,但对理解能力没有负面影响。目前还不清楚聋人读者的效率来源于何处,因为阅读是一个复杂的认知过程,需要读者从文本中提取意义,并结合视觉、词汇和上下文信息。为了评估这些因素对聋人读者阅读效率的影响,我们跟踪了他们在阅读带有目标词的句子时的眼球运动,这些目标词的长度、频率和可预测性都经过了处理,我们还评估了这些变量对跳读概率(即读者是跳过目标词还是固定目标词)和注视持续时间(即在离开目标词之前固定目标词所花费的时间)的影响,并将这些模式与具有同等阅读理解能力的听力读者进行了比较。与听力读者相比,聋人读者的跳读率更高,注视时间更短,表现出不同的单词长度和可预测性效应模式,但频率效应相似。聋人读者的眼球运动反映了他们的视觉语言处理能力,因为他们在瞄准单词进行固定时主要受单词长度的驱动,但单词跳读的频率和可预测性效应表明他们确实参与了视网膜旁的语言处理。这些结果强调了聋人读者和听人读者在阅读策略上的本质区别,并加深了我们对早期语言和感官经验对阅读行为影响的理解。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying text-based factors that contribute to the superior reading efficiency of skilled deaf readers: An eye-tracking study of length, frequency, and predictability.

Skilled deaf readers are more efficient than their hearing counterparts-they read faster, skipping more words without a negative impact on comprehension. It is not clear from where deaf readers' efficiency derives, because reading is a complex cognitive process that requires readers to extract meaning from text, incorporating visual, lexical, and contextual information. To assess the contributions of these factors to deaf readers' efficiency, we tracked their eye movements as they read sentences with target words that were manipulated for length, frequency, and predictability, and we assessed the effects of those variables on skipping probability (i.e., whether the reader skipped or fixated the target) and gaze duration (i.e., the amount of time spent fixating the word before leaving it) and compared these patterns to hearing readers with equivalent reading comprehension skill. Deaf readers demonstrated increased skipping rates and shorter gaze durations overall compared to hearing readers and exhibited different patterns of word length and predictability effects, but similar frequency effects. Deaf readers' eye movements reflect visual linguistic processing expertise as they are primarily driven by word length when targeting words for fixation, but frequency and predictability effects on word skipping indicate that they do engage in parafoveal linguistic processing. These results emphasize the qualitative differences in reading strategies between deaf and hearing readers and advance our understanding of the impact of early language and sensory experiences on reading behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Abstracting time in memory. True colors SNARC: Semantic number processing is highly automatic. The role of risk tolerance in navigation strategy decisions. A "logical intuition" based on semantic associations. Anchors and ratios to quantify and explain y-axis distortion effects in graphs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1