预测水相羟基自由基反应动力学与有机化合物在水,大气,和生物系统

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2025.106876
Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz, Zeinab Shirazi, Mohammad Jafari, Seyedeh Masoumeh Jorfi Shanani
{"title":"预测水相羟基自由基反应动力学与有机化合物在水,大气,和生物系统","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz,&nbsp;Zeinab Shirazi,&nbsp;Mohammad Jafari,&nbsp;Seyedeh Masoumeh Jorfi Shanani","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hydroxyl radical (HO·) acts as a reactive electrophile, playing crucial roles in water, the atmosphere, and biological systems. In this study, an interpretable model that employs six structural descriptors assesses the second-order rate constants (<em>k</em><sub><em>HO</em></sub>·) for various classes of organic compounds with diverse functional groups. The training dataset comprises measured <em>k</em><sub><em>HO</em></sub>· values at 25°C in the aqueous phase for over 1000 organic compounds including 876 data points of the training set, while the test (101 data points) and validation (110 data points) sets contribute to the development of the new models. The second-order rate constant model is based on the interaction of the HO· radical with different atoms and functional groups. To account for significant deviations in predicted results, an additional variable is introduced into the core model, resulting in an improved version. The calculated data from the enhanced model are compared with the outputs of a combined molecular fingerprint-machine learning complex method, considered the best available general approach. For the test set, the ratios of the maximum absolute error (AE<sub>max</sub>), the average absolute error (AAE), R<sup>2</sup>, and root mean square error (RMSE) between the improved model and the comparative method are as follows: 0.767/0.806, 0.213/0.222, 0.7197/0.6716, and 0.263/0.294, respectively. These ratios exhibit consistent trends in the validation set: 0.856/1.11, 0.207/0.226, 0.270/0.302, and 0.7830/0.7346 for AE<sub>max</sub>, AAE, RMSE, and R<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The reliability of the improved and interpretable model surpasses that of the comparative complex method when applied to new organic compounds not utilized in deriving the model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 106876"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting aqueous-phase hydroxyl radical reaction kinetics with organic compounds in water, atmosphere, and biological systems\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz,&nbsp;Zeinab Shirazi,&nbsp;Mohammad Jafari,&nbsp;Seyedeh Masoumeh Jorfi Shanani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The hydroxyl radical (HO·) acts as a reactive electrophile, playing crucial roles in water, the atmosphere, and biological systems. In this study, an interpretable model that employs six structural descriptors assesses the second-order rate constants (<em>k</em><sub><em>HO</em></sub>·) for various classes of organic compounds with diverse functional groups. The training dataset comprises measured <em>k</em><sub><em>HO</em></sub>· values at 25°C in the aqueous phase for over 1000 organic compounds including 876 data points of the training set, while the test (101 data points) and validation (110 data points) sets contribute to the development of the new models. The second-order rate constant model is based on the interaction of the HO· radical with different atoms and functional groups. To account for significant deviations in predicted results, an additional variable is introduced into the core model, resulting in an improved version. The calculated data from the enhanced model are compared with the outputs of a combined molecular fingerprint-machine learning complex method, considered the best available general approach. For the test set, the ratios of the maximum absolute error (AE<sub>max</sub>), the average absolute error (AAE), R<sup>2</sup>, and root mean square error (RMSE) between the improved model and the comparative method are as follows: 0.767/0.806, 0.213/0.222, 0.7197/0.6716, and 0.263/0.294, respectively. These ratios exhibit consistent trends in the validation set: 0.856/1.11, 0.207/0.226, 0.270/0.302, and 0.7830/0.7346 for AE<sub>max</sub>, AAE, RMSE, and R<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The reliability of the improved and interpretable model surpasses that of the comparative complex method when applied to new organic compounds not utilized in deriving the model.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025001430\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025001430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

羟基自由基(HO·)是一种反应性亲电试剂,在水、大气和生物系统中起着至关重要的作用。在本研究中,采用六种结构描述符的可解释模型评估了具有不同官能团的各类有机化合物的二阶速率常数(kHO·)。训练数据集包括超过1000种有机化合物在25°C水相中测量的kHO·值,包括训练集的876个数据点,而测试(101个数据点)和验证(110个数据点)集有助于新模型的开发。二阶速率常数模型基于HO·自由基与不同原子和官能团的相互作用。为了解释预测结果中的重大偏差,在核心模型中引入了一个额外的变量,从而得到一个改进的版本。将增强模型的计算数据与分子指纹-机器学习复合方法的输出进行比较,该方法被认为是可用的最佳通用方法。对于检验集,改进模型与比较方法的最大绝对误差(AEmax)、平均绝对误差(AAE)、R2和均方根误差(RMSE)之比分别为:0.767/0.806、0.213/0.222、0.7197/0.6716和0.263/0.294。这些比值在验证集中表现出一致的趋势:AEmax、AAE、RMSE和R2分别为0.856/1.11、0.207/0.226、0.270/0.302和0.7830/0.7346。改进的和可解释的模型的可靠性优于比较复杂的方法,当应用于新的有机化合物在推导模型时没有使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting aqueous-phase hydroxyl radical reaction kinetics with organic compounds in water, atmosphere, and biological systems
The hydroxyl radical (HO·) acts as a reactive electrophile, playing crucial roles in water, the atmosphere, and biological systems. In this study, an interpretable model that employs six structural descriptors assesses the second-order rate constants (kHO·) for various classes of organic compounds with diverse functional groups. The training dataset comprises measured kHO· values at 25°C in the aqueous phase for over 1000 organic compounds including 876 data points of the training set, while the test (101 data points) and validation (110 data points) sets contribute to the development of the new models. The second-order rate constant model is based on the interaction of the HO· radical with different atoms and functional groups. To account for significant deviations in predicted results, an additional variable is introduced into the core model, resulting in an improved version. The calculated data from the enhanced model are compared with the outputs of a combined molecular fingerprint-machine learning complex method, considered the best available general approach. For the test set, the ratios of the maximum absolute error (AEmax), the average absolute error (AAE), R2, and root mean square error (RMSE) between the improved model and the comparative method are as follows: 0.767/0.806, 0.213/0.222, 0.7197/0.6716, and 0.263/0.294, respectively. These ratios exhibit consistent trends in the validation set: 0.856/1.11, 0.207/0.226, 0.270/0.302, and 0.7830/0.7346 for AEmax, AAE, RMSE, and R2, respectively. The reliability of the improved and interpretable model surpasses that of the comparative complex method when applied to new organic compounds not utilized in deriving the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
An interpenetrating network dust suppression material for enhancing coal wettability: Interfacial wetting mechanism and spray dust suppression effect Sustainable recovery and upcycling of spent lithium-ion battery anode graphite into a metal-free heterogeneous catalyst via deep eutectic solvents Design of generalized delay timers based on alarm trigger and clearance rates Study on migration characteristics and service performance of dredged sediment-attapulgite vertical barriers under butyric acid-zinc chloride combined pollution Managing low C/N municipal wastewater in full-scale IFAS: Interactive effects of acetate dosing and seasonal cooling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1