Yuan Liu , Chengyuan Wang , Bingxin Han , Zian Liu , Tongpeng Wang , Zhenglin Tian , Longxin Ding , Xuegang Mao , Viktor Karminovd , Sergey Chumachenkod
{"title":"生态系统服务供需联动框架下脆弱地区资源管理优化","authors":"Yuan Liu , Chengyuan Wang , Bingxin Han , Zian Liu , Tongpeng Wang , Zhenglin Tian , Longxin Ding , Xuegang Mao , Viktor Karminovd , Sergey Chumachenkod","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113235"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Liu , Chengyuan Wang , Bingxin Han , Zian Liu , Tongpeng Wang , Zhenglin Tian , Longxin Ding , Xuegang Mao , Viktor Karminovd , Sergey Chumachenkod\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001645\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生态区划用于确定对保持生态系统完整性和稳定性至关重要的关键生态区域。然而,脆弱地区的分区并没有充分解决与生态资源分布不均和缺乏协同管理有关的问题。为克服这一局限性,本研究在中国典型生态脆弱带黄河流域(YRB)建立了多维生态系统综合服务供需比(CESDR)和生态风险指数(ERI)的综合生态区划框架。结果表明:①2000—2020年,长江三角洲生态资源供给能力呈南盈北亏的趋势,水资源供需空间失配;(2) 2000 - 2020年,长江经济带以中高生态风险区为主,减少83640 km2 (10.34%);(3)将长江经济带划分为生态资源供给区、生态资源开发区、生态资源红线区和生态资源涵养区;(4) 2000 - 2020年期间,在长江三角洲地区占主导地位的errz减少了20.88%,主要向ercz(增加16.18%)和ersz(增加3.49%)过渡。建议利用生态资源配置来缓解长江三角洲区域内的供需失衡,完善生态补偿机制以促进价值核算。这项研究为脆弱生态系统的可持续发展提供了见解。
Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand
Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.