调查儿童性虐待材料使用者之间的差异:来自指控和未指控个人的匿名自我报告

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107299
Hanna-Mari Lahtinen , Kirsi Honkalampi , Tegan Insoll , Juha Nurmi , Ethel Quayle , Anna Katariina Ovaska , Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen
{"title":"调查儿童性虐待材料使用者之间的差异:来自指控和未指控个人的匿名自我报告","authors":"Hanna-Mari Lahtinen ,&nbsp;Kirsi Honkalampi ,&nbsp;Tegan Insoll ,&nbsp;Juha Nurmi ,&nbsp;Ethel Quayle ,&nbsp;Anna Katariina Ovaska ,&nbsp;Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The dark web has become a more prevalent platform for the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Most CSAM users remain undetected by law enforcement, and little is known about the population not convicted.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to contribute to the research on CSAM users by investigating the differences between CSAM users who self-report having been charged for sexual offenses against a child or an adult and those who self-report not having been charged of such offenses.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>We analyzed anonymous survey data from 2384 respondents who sought CSAM on the dark web. Most of the respondents were young males (18–34-year-olds) searching for material depicting girls. The sample was divided into three groups: 1) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against children (CS offenders, <em>n</em> = 474); 2) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against adults (AS offenders, <em>n</em> = 620); and 3) those who admitted to no charges (NC group, <em>n</em> = 1290).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used multinomial logistic regression analysis to analyze differences in self-reported behavior and motivation to access CSAM between the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Those who had a previous history of violent offenses, had groomed children online, had physical contact with children, and searched for material depicting infants and toddlers were significantly more likely to belong to the CS or AS offenders group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found significant differences between the groups in their individual, motivational, and behavioral characteristics that have important implications for investigating sexual crimes and assessing and treating sexual offenders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the disparities among child sexual abuse material users: Anonymous self-reports from both charged and uncharged individuals\",\"authors\":\"Hanna-Mari Lahtinen ,&nbsp;Kirsi Honkalampi ,&nbsp;Tegan Insoll ,&nbsp;Juha Nurmi ,&nbsp;Ethel Quayle ,&nbsp;Anna Katariina Ovaska ,&nbsp;Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The dark web has become a more prevalent platform for the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Most CSAM users remain undetected by law enforcement, and little is known about the population not convicted.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to contribute to the research on CSAM users by investigating the differences between CSAM users who self-report having been charged for sexual offenses against a child or an adult and those who self-report not having been charged of such offenses.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>We analyzed anonymous survey data from 2384 respondents who sought CSAM on the dark web. Most of the respondents were young males (18–34-year-olds) searching for material depicting girls. The sample was divided into three groups: 1) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against children (CS offenders, <em>n</em> = 474); 2) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against adults (AS offenders, <em>n</em> = 620); and 3) those who admitted to no charges (NC group, <em>n</em> = 1290).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used multinomial logistic regression analysis to analyze differences in self-reported behavior and motivation to access CSAM between the three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Those who had a previous history of violent offenses, had groomed children online, had physical contact with children, and searched for material depicting infants and toddlers were significantly more likely to belong to the CS or AS offenders group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found significant differences between the groups in their individual, motivational, and behavioral characteristics that have important implications for investigating sexual crimes and assessing and treating sexual offenders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000547\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425000547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暗网已经成为传播儿童性虐待材料(CSAM)的一个更为普遍的平台。大多数使用CSAM的人都没有被执法部门发现,对没有被定罪的人也知之甚少。目的本研究的目的是通过调查自述曾对儿童或成人进行性侵犯的CSAM使用者与自述未被进行性侵犯的CSAM使用者之间的差异,为CSAM使用者的研究做出贡献。参与者和设置我们分析了2384名在暗网上寻找CSAM的受访者的匿名调查数据。大多数受访者是年轻男性(18 - 34岁),他们在搜索描绘女孩的材料。样本被分为三组:1)承认曾被指控对儿童进行性侵犯的人(CS罪犯,n = 474);2)承认对成人进行性侵犯的人(AS罪犯,620人);3)不承认指控者(NC组,n = 1290)。方法采用多项logistic回归分析,分析三组患者自述行为和获取CSAM动机的差异。结果那些有暴力犯罪前科,在网上培养孩子,与孩子有过身体接触,以及搜索描绘婴幼儿的材料的人更有可能属于CS或AS罪犯组。结论:研究发现两组在个体、动机和行为特征上存在显著差异,这对调查性犯罪、评估和治疗性犯罪者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the disparities among child sexual abuse material users: Anonymous self-reports from both charged and uncharged individuals

Background

The dark web has become a more prevalent platform for the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Most CSAM users remain undetected by law enforcement, and little is known about the population not convicted.

Objective

The aim of the study was to contribute to the research on CSAM users by investigating the differences between CSAM users who self-report having been charged for sexual offenses against a child or an adult and those who self-report not having been charged of such offenses.

Participants and setting

We analyzed anonymous survey data from 2384 respondents who sought CSAM on the dark web. Most of the respondents were young males (18–34-year-olds) searching for material depicting girls. The sample was divided into three groups: 1) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against children (CS offenders, n = 474); 2) those who admitted to having been charged for sexual offenses against adults (AS offenders, n = 620); and 3) those who admitted to no charges (NC group, n = 1290).

Methods

We used multinomial logistic regression analysis to analyze differences in self-reported behavior and motivation to access CSAM between the three groups.

Results

Those who had a previous history of violent offenses, had groomed children online, had physical contact with children, and searched for material depicting infants and toddlers were significantly more likely to belong to the CS or AS offenders group.

Conclusions

We found significant differences between the groups in their individual, motivational, and behavioral characteristics that have important implications for investigating sexual crimes and assessing and treating sexual offenders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking adverse childhood experiences: Examining the role of ACEs domains in mental health and alcohol consumption in college students Breaking the cycle: How maternal adversity shapes coercive parenting and physical harsh discipline among adolescent mothers in southern Brazil Pathways linking childhood emotional abuse and neglect to punitive attitudes: The role of interpersonal trust and emotion regulation Post-mortem fundus photographs in sudden unexpected death in infancy: An overview of the typical findings Out-of-home care and criminal conviction trajectories from adolescence to midlife: A Swedish prospective cohort study of siblings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1