正畸矫正器和固定矫治器对OHRQoL的影响:一项随机临床试验。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012
Thais Teixeira Borsato, Jéssica Madeira Bittencourt, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari
{"title":"正畸矫正器和固定矫治器对OHRQoL的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Thais Teixeira Borsato, Jéssica Madeira Bittencourt, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"39 ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Thais Teixeira Borsato, Jéssica Madeira Bittencourt, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"e12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估正畸治疗使用正畸矫正器(OAs)和固定矫治器(FAs)对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响。这项平行随机临床试验纳入了40名年龄在13 - 35岁之间的男性和女性,诊断为Angle's I类错颌。参与者被分为两组:OA (n = 20)和FA (n = 20)。OHRQoL采用巴西o嘻哈-14量表进行评估,分别在治疗前(T0)、治疗开始后1个月(T1)、6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)进行评估。资料分析采用独立t检验、卡方检验、Mann-Whitney检验和Friedman检验(p < 0.05)。在功能限制、身体疼痛、心理不适、身体残疾、心理残疾和总分方面,FAs对T1时OHRQoL的影响显著(p < 0.05)。组内比较显示FA组得分高于OA组。功能限制评分T1高于T0 (p = 0.034),身体疼痛评分T1高于T0 (p = 0.034)和T2 (p = 0.010)。T1时心理不适评分高于T2时(p = 0.015)。身体残疾评分在T1时高于T0 (p = 0.008)。总得分在T1时高于T2时(p = 0.003)。组内比较OA无明显变化。在第一个月,与FAs治疗的患者相比,接受oa治疗的患者对OHRQoL的影响较小。在6个月的随访中,两组之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of violet light, bleaching gel, or their combination, in in-office bleaching: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and bioactivity of bioceramic repair materials. Is bruxism associated with the use of screen devices in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Bacterial proteomic profile of early colonizers on the acquired pellicle of patients with head and neck cancer. Accuracy of remote diagnosis of oral mucositis in children and adolescents with cancer using a mobile App: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1