网膜贴片预防胆囊次全切除术患者胆漏:倾向评分分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02129-w
Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Violeta Avendaño-Morales, Alejandro González-Muñoz, Isabella Van-Londoño, Juan Felipe Díaz-Castrillón, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo
{"title":"网膜贴片预防胆囊次全切除术患者胆漏:倾向评分分析。","authors":"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Violeta Avendaño-Morales, Alejandro González-Muñoz, Isabella Van-Londoño, Juan Felipe Díaz-Castrillón, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02129-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subtotal cholecystectomy is one of the most frequent bail-out procedures performed during difficult cholecystectomy. A common complication to this procedure is bile leak, and thus multiple strategies have been created to avoid its appearance. This study aims to evaluate the effectivity of using an omental patch as bile leak prevention in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022 was performed. 17 patients had an omental patch, while 378 did not; the latter were included to evaluate surgical outcomes with bile leak as a primary outcome using a propensity score matching analysis (PSM). Patients' median age in both groups after PSM was 71.00 (IQR: 59.00-81.00) and 69.00 (IQR: 61.75-80.25) years, respectively. The dominant sex in both groups was male. In most cases surgical procedure indication was cholecystitis. Patients who had an omental patch did not present statistically significant differences for bile leak rates compared to patients who did not (29.4% versus 17.6%, p = 0.456, respectively). Similar results were observed when evaluating the need for postoperative ERCP for bile leak management (23.5 versus 5.9%, p = 0.078). A statistically significant higher proportion of major complications were observed in patients who had an omental patch (47.1% versus 19.1%, p = 0.038). Pedicled omental patch was not an effective measure for preventing bile leak, and it even presented a higher rate of complications. It is thus imperative to continue evaluating other strategies for the prevention of bile leak during subtotal cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"501-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omental patch as prevention for bile leak in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy: a propensity score analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Violeta Avendaño-Morales, Alejandro González-Muñoz, Isabella Van-Londoño, Juan Felipe Díaz-Castrillón, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02129-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subtotal cholecystectomy is one of the most frequent bail-out procedures performed during difficult cholecystectomy. A common complication to this procedure is bile leak, and thus multiple strategies have been created to avoid its appearance. This study aims to evaluate the effectivity of using an omental patch as bile leak prevention in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022 was performed. 17 patients had an omental patch, while 378 did not; the latter were included to evaluate surgical outcomes with bile leak as a primary outcome using a propensity score matching analysis (PSM). Patients' median age in both groups after PSM was 71.00 (IQR: 59.00-81.00) and 69.00 (IQR: 61.75-80.25) years, respectively. The dominant sex in both groups was male. In most cases surgical procedure indication was cholecystitis. Patients who had an omental patch did not present statistically significant differences for bile leak rates compared to patients who did not (29.4% versus 17.6%, p = 0.456, respectively). Similar results were observed when evaluating the need for postoperative ERCP for bile leak management (23.5 versus 5.9%, p = 0.078). A statistically significant higher proportion of major complications were observed in patients who had an omental patch (47.1% versus 19.1%, p = 0.038). Pedicled omental patch was not an effective measure for preventing bile leak, and it even presented a higher rate of complications. It is thus imperative to continue evaluating other strategies for the prevention of bile leak during subtotal cholecystectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"501-509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02129-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02129-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胆囊次全切除术是困难胆囊切除术中最常见的救助手术之一。该手术的一个常见并发症是胆汁泄漏,因此已经制定了多种策略来避免其出现。本研究旨在评估网膜贴片预防胆囊次全切除术患者胆漏的有效性。一项回顾性队列研究包括2014年至2022年间接受胆囊次全切除术的患者。网膜贴片17例,未贴网膜贴片378例;后者被纳入使用倾向评分匹配分析(PSM)评估以胆漏为主要结局的手术结果。两组患者经PSM后的中位年龄分别为71.00 (IQR: 59.00-81.00)和69.00 (IQR: 61.75-80.25)岁。两组的优势性别均为雄性。多数病例手术指征为胆囊炎。有网膜贴片的患者与没有网膜贴片的患者相比,胆漏率没有统计学上的显著差异(分别为29.4%对17.6%,p = 0.456)。在评估术后ERCP治疗胆漏的必要性时,观察到类似的结果(23.5%对5.9%,p = 0.078)。大网膜贴片组出现严重并发症的比例显著高于大网膜贴片组(47.1%比19.1%,p = 0.038)。带蒂网膜贴片不能有效预防胆漏,而且并发症发生率较高。因此,有必要继续评估在胆囊次全切除术中预防胆漏的其他策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Omental patch as prevention for bile leak in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy: a propensity score analysis.

Subtotal cholecystectomy is one of the most frequent bail-out procedures performed during difficult cholecystectomy. A common complication to this procedure is bile leak, and thus multiple strategies have been created to avoid its appearance. This study aims to evaluate the effectivity of using an omental patch as bile leak prevention in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2022 was performed. 17 patients had an omental patch, while 378 did not; the latter were included to evaluate surgical outcomes with bile leak as a primary outcome using a propensity score matching analysis (PSM). Patients' median age in both groups after PSM was 71.00 (IQR: 59.00-81.00) and 69.00 (IQR: 61.75-80.25) years, respectively. The dominant sex in both groups was male. In most cases surgical procedure indication was cholecystitis. Patients who had an omental patch did not present statistically significant differences for bile leak rates compared to patients who did not (29.4% versus 17.6%, p = 0.456, respectively). Similar results were observed when evaluating the need for postoperative ERCP for bile leak management (23.5 versus 5.9%, p = 0.078). A statistically significant higher proportion of major complications were observed in patients who had an omental patch (47.1% versus 19.1%, p = 0.038). Pedicled omental patch was not an effective measure for preventing bile leak, and it even presented a higher rate of complications. It is thus imperative to continue evaluating other strategies for the prevention of bile leak during subtotal cholecystectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Ligation of the segmental pulmonary artery during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy: Are DS Titanium Ligation Clips on a par with conventional ligation procedures? Management of lactational and non-lactational breast abscesses: an evidence-based framework to support breast surgeon decision-making. Regarding: Nachira D, Calabrese G, Bertolaccini L, et al. Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy in pancreatic cancer : Updates in Surgery, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02605-x. Predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure after hemi-hepatectomy using a combined model based on age, ALBI score, and the future liver remnant-to-spleen volume ratio. The WPG score for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after Wirsung-pancreatogastrostomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1