影响液体活检在癌症治疗中的应用的因素综述。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s13046-025-03322-w
Samran Sheriff, Maree Saba, Romika Patel, Georgia Fisher, Tanja Schroeder, Gaston Arnolda, Dan Luo, Lydia Warburton, Elin Gray, Georgina Long, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Helen Rizos, Louise Ann Ellis
{"title":"影响液体活检在癌症治疗中的应用的因素综述。","authors":"Samran Sheriff, Maree Saba, Romika Patel, Georgia Fisher, Tanja Schroeder, Gaston Arnolda, Dan Luo, Lydia Warburton, Elin Gray, Georgina Long, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Helen Rizos, Louise Ann Ellis","doi":"10.1186/s13046-025-03322-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid biopsy (LB) offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsies in cancer care, enabling real-time monitoring and personalized treatment. Despite its potential, the routine implementation of LB in clinical practice faces significant challenges. This scoping review examines the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of liquid biopsies into standard cancer care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched without language restrictions. We included peer-reviewed articles that were published between January 2019 and March 2024 that focused on the implementation of LB in cancer care or described barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Data relevant to the review objective, including key article characteristics; barriers and facilitators of implementation; and recommendations for advancement or optimisation; were extracted and analysed using thematic and visual network analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the included articles were narrative review articles (84%), with most from China (24.2%) and the United States (20%). Thematic analysis identified four main categories and their associated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of LB in cancer care: (1) Laboratory and personnel requirements; (2) Disease specificity; (3) Biomarker-based liquid biopsy; and (4) Policy and regulation. The majority of barriers identified were concentrated in the pre-analytical phase, highlighting the lack of standardization in LB technologies and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a thematic analysis of the barriers and facilitators to LB implementation, we present an integrated tool designed to encourage the standardization of testing methods for clinical practice guidelines in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":50199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of factors influencing the implementation of liquid biopsy for cancer care.\",\"authors\":\"Samran Sheriff, Maree Saba, Romika Patel, Georgia Fisher, Tanja Schroeder, Gaston Arnolda, Dan Luo, Lydia Warburton, Elin Gray, Georgina Long, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Helen Rizos, Louise Ann Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13046-025-03322-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid biopsy (LB) offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsies in cancer care, enabling real-time monitoring and personalized treatment. Despite its potential, the routine implementation of LB in clinical practice faces significant challenges. This scoping review examines the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of liquid biopsies into standard cancer care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched without language restrictions. We included peer-reviewed articles that were published between January 2019 and March 2024 that focused on the implementation of LB in cancer care or described barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Data relevant to the review objective, including key article characteristics; barriers and facilitators of implementation; and recommendations for advancement or optimisation; were extracted and analysed using thematic and visual network analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the included articles were narrative review articles (84%), with most from China (24.2%) and the United States (20%). Thematic analysis identified four main categories and their associated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of LB in cancer care: (1) Laboratory and personnel requirements; (2) Disease specificity; (3) Biomarker-based liquid biopsy; and (4) Policy and regulation. The majority of barriers identified were concentrated in the pre-analytical phase, highlighting the lack of standardization in LB technologies and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a thematic analysis of the barriers and facilitators to LB implementation, we present an integrated tool designed to encourage the standardization of testing methods for clinical practice guidelines in the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-025-03322-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-025-03322-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:液体活检(LB)在癌症治疗中提供了一种有前途的、微创的替代传统组织活检的方法,可以实现实时监测和个性化治疗。尽管具有潜力,但在临床实践中常规实施LB仍面临重大挑战。本综述探讨了影响液体活检在标准癌症治疗中实施的障碍和促进因素。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science四大学术数据库,无语言限制。我们纳入了2019年1月至2024年3月期间发表的同行评议文章,这些文章的重点是在癌症治疗中实施LB,或描述了实施LB的障碍和促进因素。与评审目标相关的数据,包括文章的主要特征;实施的障碍和促进因素;提出改进或优化的建议;使用主题和视觉网络分析进行提取和分析。结果:纳入的文献以叙事性综述为主(84%),其中以中国文献(24.2%)和美国文献(20%)居多。专题分析确定了四个主要类别及其在癌症治疗中实施LB的相关障碍和促进因素:(1)实验室和人员要求;(2)疾病特异性;(3)基于生物标志物的液体活检;(4)政策法规。发现的大多数障碍集中在分析前阶段,突出了LB技术和结果缺乏标准化。结论:通过对LB实施的障碍和促进因素的专题分析,我们提出了一个集成工具,旨在鼓励该领域临床实践指南的测试方法标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A scoping review of factors influencing the implementation of liquid biopsy for cancer care.

Background: Liquid biopsy (LB) offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsies in cancer care, enabling real-time monitoring and personalized treatment. Despite its potential, the routine implementation of LB in clinical practice faces significant challenges. This scoping review examines the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of liquid biopsies into standard cancer care.

Methods: Four academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched without language restrictions. We included peer-reviewed articles that were published between January 2019 and March 2024 that focused on the implementation of LB in cancer care or described barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Data relevant to the review objective, including key article characteristics; barriers and facilitators of implementation; and recommendations for advancement or optimisation; were extracted and analysed using thematic and visual network analyses.

Results: The majority of the included articles were narrative review articles (84%), with most from China (24.2%) and the United States (20%). Thematic analysis identified four main categories and their associated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of LB in cancer care: (1) Laboratory and personnel requirements; (2) Disease specificity; (3) Biomarker-based liquid biopsy; and (4) Policy and regulation. The majority of barriers identified were concentrated in the pre-analytical phase, highlighting the lack of standardization in LB technologies and outcomes.

Conclusions: Through a thematic analysis of the barriers and facilitators to LB implementation, we present an integrated tool designed to encourage the standardization of testing methods for clinical practice guidelines in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
333
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research is an esteemed peer-reviewed publication that focuses on cancer research, encompassing everything from fundamental discoveries to practical applications. We welcome submissions that showcase groundbreaking advancements in the field of cancer research, especially those that bridge the gap between laboratory findings and clinical implementation. Our goal is to foster a deeper understanding of cancer, improve prevention and detection strategies, facilitate accurate diagnosis, and enhance treatment options. We are particularly interested in manuscripts that shed light on the mechanisms behind the development and progression of cancer, including metastasis. Additionally, we encourage submissions that explore molecular alterations or biomarkers that can help predict the efficacy of different treatments or identify drug resistance. Translational research related to targeted therapies, personalized medicine, tumor immunotherapy, and innovative approaches applicable to clinical investigations are also of great interest to us. We provide a platform for the dissemination of large-scale molecular characterizations of human tumors and encourage researchers to share their insights, discoveries, and methodologies with the wider scientific community. By publishing high-quality research articles, reviews, and commentaries, the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research strives to contribute to the continuous improvement of cancer care and make a meaningful impact on patients' lives.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Osteoglycin (OGN) reverses epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasiveness in colorectal cancer via EGFR/Akt pathway. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, CIITA and HLA-II: who is watching the watchdog? Targeting APE1 endonuclease activity impairs metastasis and enhances genotoxic therapy response in pancreatic cancer. Cadherin 17 and digestive cancers: from diagnostic to therapeutic opportunities. Gastric cancer cells-derived exosomal miR-151a-5p induces an immunosuppressive microenvironment through promoting LAG3+TAMs infiltration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1