股骨粗隆间骨折切开固定的危险因素Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) < 10mm, apex - center < 4mm

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112205
Arielle Richey Levine, Trevan Klug, James Cross, Motasem Salameh, Matthew Riedel, Michael Leslie
{"title":"股骨粗隆间骨折切开固定的危险因素Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) < 10mm, apex - center < 4mm","authors":"Arielle Richey Levine,&nbsp;Trevan Klug,&nbsp;James Cross,&nbsp;Motasem Salameh,&nbsp;Matthew Riedel,&nbsp;Michael Leslie","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>TAD &gt; 25 mm is a risk factor for cut-out in intramedullary nailing. Less attention has been given to the risk factors for central cut-through and the possible outcomes of TAD &lt;10 mm. Furthermore, the risk of cut-through depending on minimum depth on either anterior-posterior (AP) or lateral views has not been explored. The goal of this study is to outline the parameters that increase risk of cut-through in intertrochanteric hip fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of 2128 intertrochanteric hip fractures admitted to a single level 1 academic trauma center from 2014 – 2023 was conducted<strong>.</strong> Variables included patient and operative characteristics, fracture fixation device, fracture type based on OTA/AO 2018 classification, TAD, neck-shaft angle and radiographic and clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TAD &lt;10 millimeters carried a significantly higher risk for lag screw and blade cut-through. Cut-through risk increased significantly when either AP or lateral apex-to-center distance was &lt;4 millimeters, including when comparing fracture reduction quality for a cohort including sliding hip screws, lag screws and blades. Cut-out complications in this cohort only occurred with a TAD &gt;10 mm and was significantly more likely to occur with TAD &gt;25 mm, similar to prior studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAD optimization between 10 and 25 mm reduces risk of both cut-out and cut-through and maintenance of 4 mm of distance between apex-to-center distance may help decrease the risk of cut-through complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 3","pages":"Article 112205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for cut-throughs in intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) <10 mm and Apex-to-Center <4 mm\",\"authors\":\"Arielle Richey Levine,&nbsp;Trevan Klug,&nbsp;James Cross,&nbsp;Motasem Salameh,&nbsp;Matthew Riedel,&nbsp;Michael Leslie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>TAD &gt; 25 mm is a risk factor for cut-out in intramedullary nailing. Less attention has been given to the risk factors for central cut-through and the possible outcomes of TAD &lt;10 mm. Furthermore, the risk of cut-through depending on minimum depth on either anterior-posterior (AP) or lateral views has not been explored. The goal of this study is to outline the parameters that increase risk of cut-through in intertrochanteric hip fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of 2128 intertrochanteric hip fractures admitted to a single level 1 academic trauma center from 2014 – 2023 was conducted<strong>.</strong> Variables included patient and operative characteristics, fracture fixation device, fracture type based on OTA/AO 2018 classification, TAD, neck-shaft angle and radiographic and clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TAD &lt;10 millimeters carried a significantly higher risk for lag screw and blade cut-through. Cut-through risk increased significantly when either AP or lateral apex-to-center distance was &lt;4 millimeters, including when comparing fracture reduction quality for a cohort including sliding hip screws, lag screws and blades. Cut-out complications in this cohort only occurred with a TAD &gt;10 mm and was significantly more likely to occur with TAD &gt;25 mm, similar to prior studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAD optimization between 10 and 25 mm reduces risk of both cut-out and cut-through and maintenance of 4 mm of distance between apex-to-center distance may help decrease the risk of cut-through complications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 112205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000658\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ObjectivesTAD祝辞25mm是髓内钉切开的危险因素。对中心切口的危险因素和TAD <;10 mm的可能结果的关注较少。此外,在前后位(AP)或侧位视图上依赖最小深度的切开风险尚未探讨。本研究的目的是概述增加股骨粗隆间骨折切开风险的参数。方法回顾性分析2014 - 2023年在某一级外伤学术中心收治的2128例股骨粗隆间骨折病例。变量包括患者和手术特征、骨折固定装置、基于OTA/AO 2018分类的骨折类型、TAD、颈轴角、影像学和临床结果。结果stad <;10 mm有较高的迟滞螺钉和刀片穿透风险。当AP或侧尖到中心的距离为4毫米时,包括比较滑动髋关节螺钉、拉力螺钉和刀片的骨折复位质量时,切割风险显著增加。该队列中切除并发症仅发生在TAD >;10 mm,而TAD >;25 mm更容易发生,与先前的研究相似。结论优化10 ~ 25 mm可降低切开和切开的风险,维持4 mm的尖心距离可降低切开并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for cut-throughs in intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) <10 mm and Apex-to-Center <4 mm

Objectives

TAD > 25 mm is a risk factor for cut-out in intramedullary nailing. Less attention has been given to the risk factors for central cut-through and the possible outcomes of TAD <10 mm. Furthermore, the risk of cut-through depending on minimum depth on either anterior-posterior (AP) or lateral views has not been explored. The goal of this study is to outline the parameters that increase risk of cut-through in intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Methods

A retrospective review of 2128 intertrochanteric hip fractures admitted to a single level 1 academic trauma center from 2014 – 2023 was conducted. Variables included patient and operative characteristics, fracture fixation device, fracture type based on OTA/AO 2018 classification, TAD, neck-shaft angle and radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Results

TAD <10 millimeters carried a significantly higher risk for lag screw and blade cut-through. Cut-through risk increased significantly when either AP or lateral apex-to-center distance was <4 millimeters, including when comparing fracture reduction quality for a cohort including sliding hip screws, lag screws and blades. Cut-out complications in this cohort only occurred with a TAD >10 mm and was significantly more likely to occur with TAD >25 mm, similar to prior studies.

Conclusion

TAD optimization between 10 and 25 mm reduces risk of both cut-out and cut-through and maintenance of 4 mm of distance between apex-to-center distance may help decrease the risk of cut-through complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for postoperative infection after non-elective femur fracture fixation in pediatric patients Perioperative multidose tranexamic acid combined with erythropoietin and iron isomaltoside supplementation reduces transfusion requirements of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures Factors associated with older adult fracture visits to United States emergency departments, 2013-2022 Autologous bone marrow aspirate as a standalone treatment in patients with impaired fracture healing: A scoping review Antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for gunshot wound–related open fractures: A single-center retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1