建筑光伏电池系统容量配置与运行策略的多目标分层协同优化

IF 10.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of energy storage Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.est.2025.115694
Li Wan , Bin Zou , Jinqing Peng , Rongxin Yin , Ji Li , Renge Li , Bin Hao
{"title":"建筑光伏电池系统容量配置与运行策略的多目标分层协同优化","authors":"Li Wan ,&nbsp;Bin Zou ,&nbsp;Jinqing Peng ,&nbsp;Rongxin Yin ,&nbsp;Ji Li ,&nbsp;Renge Li ,&nbsp;Bin Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.115694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proper configuration of battery capacity is critical for achieving desirable performance for distributed building photovoltaic-battery (PVB) systems. However, conventional battery capacity configurations are usually performed based on predefined rule-based operational strategies, of which the objectives are generally inconsistent with those of capacity optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposed a multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization (MHCO) framework for battery capacity configuration and operational strategy, which balances economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Within the proposed framework, the battery capacity configuration is positioned in the upper layer and the operational strategy in the lower layer, with both layers sharing a unified objective function. During each optimization step, the upper layer transmits updated battery capacities to the lower layer, which provides feedback on charge and discharge control sets and performance indicators. The optimization problem was solved using the second-generation Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with Dynamic Programming (DP). The proposed MHCO was comprehensively compared to the conventional method in terms of the optimized battery capacity (<em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>) and the normalized gain <em>(NG</em>) of performance indicators. Based on the case study of a medium-sized apartment building, the MHCO achieved larger <em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>, and the <em>NG</em> was up to 0.27, proving the necessity of aligning the objectives of capacity configuration and operational strategy. Energy flow analysis showed that the MHCO method has greater adaptability to various optimization requirements by unifying the objectives of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy. As a result, the MHCO method showed better performance under conditions of different PV penetration rates, dynamic FiT, and dynamic GEF, achieving maximum <em>NG</em> of 0.92, 0.31, and 0.80, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 115694"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy for photovoltaic-battery systems in buildings\",\"authors\":\"Li Wan ,&nbsp;Bin Zou ,&nbsp;Jinqing Peng ,&nbsp;Rongxin Yin ,&nbsp;Ji Li ,&nbsp;Renge Li ,&nbsp;Bin Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.est.2025.115694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Proper configuration of battery capacity is critical for achieving desirable performance for distributed building photovoltaic-battery (PVB) systems. However, conventional battery capacity configurations are usually performed based on predefined rule-based operational strategies, of which the objectives are generally inconsistent with those of capacity optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposed a multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization (MHCO) framework for battery capacity configuration and operational strategy, which balances economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Within the proposed framework, the battery capacity configuration is positioned in the upper layer and the operational strategy in the lower layer, with both layers sharing a unified objective function. During each optimization step, the upper layer transmits updated battery capacities to the lower layer, which provides feedback on charge and discharge control sets and performance indicators. The optimization problem was solved using the second-generation Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with Dynamic Programming (DP). The proposed MHCO was comprehensively compared to the conventional method in terms of the optimized battery capacity (<em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>) and the normalized gain <em>(NG</em>) of performance indicators. Based on the case study of a medium-sized apartment building, the MHCO achieved larger <em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>, and the <em>NG</em> was up to 0.27, proving the necessity of aligning the objectives of capacity configuration and operational strategy. Energy flow analysis showed that the MHCO method has greater adaptability to various optimization requirements by unifying the objectives of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy. As a result, the MHCO method showed better performance under conditions of different PV penetration rates, dynamic FiT, and dynamic GEF, achieving maximum <em>NG</em> of 0.92, 0.31, and 0.80, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25004074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25004074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分布式建筑光伏电池(PVB)系统能否获得理想的性能,关键在于电池容量的合理配置。然而,传统的电池容量配置通常基于预定义的基于规则的操作策略,其目标通常与容量优化目标不一致。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种多目标分层协同优化(MHCO)框架,用于电池容量配置和运行策略,以平衡经济、技术和环境因素。在本文提出的框架中,电池容量配置定位在上层,运营策略定位在下层,两层共享统一的目标函数。在每一步优化过程中,上层将更新后的电池容量传递给下层,下层反馈充放电控制集和性能指标。采用第二代非支配排序遗传算法(NSGA-II)结合动态规划(DP)求解优化问题。在优化电池容量(Eb,o)和性能指标归一化增益(NG)方面,与传统方法进行了综合比较。以某中型住宅楼为例,MHCO实现了较大的Eb, 0, NG达到了0.27,证明了容量配置目标与运营策略相结合的必要性。能量流分析表明,MHCO方法统一了电池容量配置目标和运行策略目标,对各种优化需求具有更强的适应性。结果表明,MHCO方法在不同PV渗透率、动态FiT和动态GEF条件下均表现出较好的性能,最大NG值分别为0.92、0.31和0.80。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy for photovoltaic-battery systems in buildings
Proper configuration of battery capacity is critical for achieving desirable performance for distributed building photovoltaic-battery (PVB) systems. However, conventional battery capacity configurations are usually performed based on predefined rule-based operational strategies, of which the objectives are generally inconsistent with those of capacity optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposed a multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization (MHCO) framework for battery capacity configuration and operational strategy, which balances economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Within the proposed framework, the battery capacity configuration is positioned in the upper layer and the operational strategy in the lower layer, with both layers sharing a unified objective function. During each optimization step, the upper layer transmits updated battery capacities to the lower layer, which provides feedback on charge and discharge control sets and performance indicators. The optimization problem was solved using the second-generation Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with Dynamic Programming (DP). The proposed MHCO was comprehensively compared to the conventional method in terms of the optimized battery capacity (Eb,o) and the normalized gain (NG) of performance indicators. Based on the case study of a medium-sized apartment building, the MHCO achieved larger Eb,o, and the NG was up to 0.27, proving the necessity of aligning the objectives of capacity configuration and operational strategy. Energy flow analysis showed that the MHCO method has greater adaptability to various optimization requirements by unifying the objectives of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy. As a result, the MHCO method showed better performance under conditions of different PV penetration rates, dynamic FiT, and dynamic GEF, achieving maximum NG of 0.92, 0.31, and 0.80, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Heat-generation–dissipation-decoupled battery thermal modeling across multiple cooling boundaries: A physics-constrained transfer learning framework Recent advances on anion-doped layered transition metal oxides for sodium-ion batteries: A critical review Optimization study on cold discharge performance of pressure equalizing and rectifying diffuser for emergency cold storage tanks in data centers Unlocking time-tailored Ag nanoparticles decorated nanoflakes of NiO for binder-free supercapacitor Surface-engineered FeF2 with polyvinyl alcohol–derived carbon for stable and high-capacity lithium-ion cathodes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1