Li Wan , Bin Zou , Jinqing Peng , Rongxin Yin , Ji Li , Renge Li , Bin Hao
{"title":"建筑光伏电池系统容量配置与运行策略的多目标分层协同优化","authors":"Li Wan , Bin Zou , Jinqing Peng , Rongxin Yin , Ji Li , Renge Li , Bin Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.115694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proper configuration of battery capacity is critical for achieving desirable performance for distributed building photovoltaic-battery (PVB) systems. However, conventional battery capacity configurations are usually performed based on predefined rule-based operational strategies, of which the objectives are generally inconsistent with those of capacity optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposed a multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization (MHCO) framework for battery capacity configuration and operational strategy, which balances economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Within the proposed framework, the battery capacity configuration is positioned in the upper layer and the operational strategy in the lower layer, with both layers sharing a unified objective function. During each optimization step, the upper layer transmits updated battery capacities to the lower layer, which provides feedback on charge and discharge control sets and performance indicators. The optimization problem was solved using the second-generation Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with Dynamic Programming (DP). The proposed MHCO was comprehensively compared to the conventional method in terms of the optimized battery capacity (<em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>) and the normalized gain <em>(NG</em>) of performance indicators. Based on the case study of a medium-sized apartment building, the MHCO achieved larger <em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>, and the <em>NG</em> was up to 0.27, proving the necessity of aligning the objectives of capacity configuration and operational strategy. Energy flow analysis showed that the MHCO method has greater adaptability to various optimization requirements by unifying the objectives of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy. As a result, the MHCO method showed better performance under conditions of different PV penetration rates, dynamic FiT, and dynamic GEF, achieving maximum <em>NG</em> of 0.92, 0.31, and 0.80, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 115694"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy for photovoltaic-battery systems in buildings\",\"authors\":\"Li Wan , Bin Zou , Jinqing Peng , Rongxin Yin , Ji Li , Renge Li , Bin Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.est.2025.115694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Proper configuration of battery capacity is critical for achieving desirable performance for distributed building photovoltaic-battery (PVB) systems. However, conventional battery capacity configurations are usually performed based on predefined rule-based operational strategies, of which the objectives are generally inconsistent with those of capacity optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposed a multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization (MHCO) framework for battery capacity configuration and operational strategy, which balances economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Within the proposed framework, the battery capacity configuration is positioned in the upper layer and the operational strategy in the lower layer, with both layers sharing a unified objective function. During each optimization step, the upper layer transmits updated battery capacities to the lower layer, which provides feedback on charge and discharge control sets and performance indicators. The optimization problem was solved using the second-generation Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with Dynamic Programming (DP). The proposed MHCO was comprehensively compared to the conventional method in terms of the optimized battery capacity (<em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>) and the normalized gain <em>(NG</em>) of performance indicators. Based on the case study of a medium-sized apartment building, the MHCO achieved larger <em>E</em><sub><em>b,o</em></sub>, and the <em>NG</em> was up to 0.27, proving the necessity of aligning the objectives of capacity configuration and operational strategy. Energy flow analysis showed that the MHCO method has greater adaptability to various optimization requirements by unifying the objectives of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy. As a result, the MHCO method showed better performance under conditions of different PV penetration rates, dynamic FiT, and dynamic GEF, achieving maximum <em>NG</em> of 0.92, 0.31, and 0.80, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25004074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25004074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy for photovoltaic-battery systems in buildings
Proper configuration of battery capacity is critical for achieving desirable performance for distributed building photovoltaic-battery (PVB) systems. However, conventional battery capacity configurations are usually performed based on predefined rule-based operational strategies, of which the objectives are generally inconsistent with those of capacity optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposed a multi-objective hierarchical co-optimization (MHCO) framework for battery capacity configuration and operational strategy, which balances economic, technological, and environmental considerations. Within the proposed framework, the battery capacity configuration is positioned in the upper layer and the operational strategy in the lower layer, with both layers sharing a unified objective function. During each optimization step, the upper layer transmits updated battery capacities to the lower layer, which provides feedback on charge and discharge control sets and performance indicators. The optimization problem was solved using the second-generation Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) coupled with Dynamic Programming (DP). The proposed MHCO was comprehensively compared to the conventional method in terms of the optimized battery capacity (Eb,o) and the normalized gain (NG) of performance indicators. Based on the case study of a medium-sized apartment building, the MHCO achieved larger Eb,o, and the NG was up to 0.27, proving the necessity of aligning the objectives of capacity configuration and operational strategy. Energy flow analysis showed that the MHCO method has greater adaptability to various optimization requirements by unifying the objectives of battery capacity configuration and operational strategy. As a result, the MHCO method showed better performance under conditions of different PV penetration rates, dynamic FiT, and dynamic GEF, achieving maximum NG of 0.92, 0.31, and 0.80, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.