基于公民科学的农业图像数据采集中影响深度学习模型性能的因素:以咖啡作物为例

IF 10.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2025.110096
Juan C. Rivera-Palacio , Christian Bunn , Masahiro Ryo
{"title":"基于公民科学的农业图像数据采集中影响深度学习模型性能的因素:以咖啡作物为例","authors":"Juan C. Rivera-Palacio ,&nbsp;Christian Bunn ,&nbsp;Masahiro Ryo","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Citizen science is an effective approach for collecting extensive data scalable for deep learning, although data quality is debatable. However, few studies have determined the factors associated with data collection that affect model performance and potential sampling bias. This study aims to identify the factors that significantly influence the performance of a deep learning object detection model in agricultural prediction tasks. To do so, we analyzed errors in a You Only Look Once (YOLO v8) model trained for counting the number of coffee cherries in mobile pictures. The model was trained with 436 images taken in Colombia and Peru collected by local farmers as a citizen science approach. We analyzed the prediction errors of the model using 637 additional pictures. We then applied a linear mixed model (LMM) and a decision tree machine learning model to regress the model’s error against predictor variables related to the following categories: photographer influence, geographic location, mobile phone characteristics, picture characteristics, and coffee varieties. Our results show the strong influence of photographer identity and adherence (whether the image collection protocol was followed or not) on model prediction error. Following the protocol can increase model performance from an <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span> of 0.48 to 0.73. Additionally, model performance varied significantly depending on photographer identity, with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span> ranging from 0.45 to 0.93. In contrast, factors such as mobile phone characteristics (e.g., frontal camera resolution, flash type, and screen size), using the screen behind the branch to obscure other cherries, coffee varieties, and geographic location did not significantly affect prediction error. These findings demonstrate that data quality in citizen science–based data collection for enhancing model prediction can be achieved through straightforward and comprehensive protocols, customized volunteer training, and regular feedback from experts. Such measures collectively support the robust application of deep learning models in agriculture. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that any mobile device with a camera can contribute to citizen science initiatives, underscoring the potential and scalability of this approach in agricultural research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 110096"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting deep learning model performance in citizen science–based image data collection for agriculture: A case study on coffee crops\",\"authors\":\"Juan C. Rivera-Palacio ,&nbsp;Christian Bunn ,&nbsp;Masahiro Ryo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Citizen science is an effective approach for collecting extensive data scalable for deep learning, although data quality is debatable. However, few studies have determined the factors associated with data collection that affect model performance and potential sampling bias. This study aims to identify the factors that significantly influence the performance of a deep learning object detection model in agricultural prediction tasks. To do so, we analyzed errors in a You Only Look Once (YOLO v8) model trained for counting the number of coffee cherries in mobile pictures. The model was trained with 436 images taken in Colombia and Peru collected by local farmers as a citizen science approach. We analyzed the prediction errors of the model using 637 additional pictures. We then applied a linear mixed model (LMM) and a decision tree machine learning model to regress the model’s error against predictor variables related to the following categories: photographer influence, geographic location, mobile phone characteristics, picture characteristics, and coffee varieties. Our results show the strong influence of photographer identity and adherence (whether the image collection protocol was followed or not) on model prediction error. Following the protocol can increase model performance from an <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span> of 0.48 to 0.73. Additionally, model performance varied significantly depending on photographer identity, with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span> ranging from 0.45 to 0.93. In contrast, factors such as mobile phone characteristics (e.g., frontal camera resolution, flash type, and screen size), using the screen behind the branch to obscure other cherries, coffee varieties, and geographic location did not significantly affect prediction error. These findings demonstrate that data quality in citizen science–based data collection for enhancing model prediction can be achieved through straightforward and comprehensive protocols, customized volunteer training, and regular feedback from experts. Such measures collectively support the robust application of deep learning models in agriculture. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that any mobile device with a camera can contribute to citizen science initiatives, underscoring the potential and scalability of this approach in agricultural research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"232 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925002029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925002029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民科学是一种有效的方法来收集广泛的数据可扩展的深度学习,尽管数据质量是有争议的。然而,很少有研究确定了影响模型性能和潜在抽样偏差的数据收集相关因素。本研究旨在识别在农业预测任务中显著影响深度学习目标检测模型性能的因素。为此,我们分析了“你只看一次”(YOLO v8)模型中的错误,该模型经过训练,用于计算手机图片中咖啡樱桃的数量。该模型是用哥伦比亚和秘鲁当地农民作为公民科学方法收集的436张图像进行训练的。我们用637张附加图片分析了模型的预测误差。然后,我们应用线性混合模型(LMM)和决策树机器学习模型,对与以下类别相关的预测变量回归模型的误差:摄影师影响、地理位置、手机特征、图片特征和咖啡品种。我们的研究结果表明,摄影师身份和依从性(无论是否遵循图像采集协议)对模型预测误差有很强的影响。遵循该协议可以将模型性能从R2的0.48提高到0.73。此外,模型性能随摄影师身份的不同而显著变化,R2范围为0.45至0.93。相比之下,手机特征(如正面摄像头分辨率、闪光灯类型和屏幕尺寸)、用树枝后面的屏幕掩盖其他樱桃、咖啡品种和地理位置等因素对预测误差没有显著影响。这些发现表明,通过简单和全面的协议、定制的志愿者培训以及专家的定期反馈,可以实现基于公民科学的数据收集的数据质量,以增强模型预测。这些措施共同支持深度学习模型在农业中的稳健应用。此外,这项研究表明,任何带有相机的移动设备都可以为公民科学计划做出贡献,强调了这种方法在农业研究中的潜力和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors affecting deep learning model performance in citizen science–based image data collection for agriculture: A case study on coffee crops
Citizen science is an effective approach for collecting extensive data scalable for deep learning, although data quality is debatable. However, few studies have determined the factors associated with data collection that affect model performance and potential sampling bias. This study aims to identify the factors that significantly influence the performance of a deep learning object detection model in agricultural prediction tasks. To do so, we analyzed errors in a You Only Look Once (YOLO v8) model trained for counting the number of coffee cherries in mobile pictures. The model was trained with 436 images taken in Colombia and Peru collected by local farmers as a citizen science approach. We analyzed the prediction errors of the model using 637 additional pictures. We then applied a linear mixed model (LMM) and a decision tree machine learning model to regress the model’s error against predictor variables related to the following categories: photographer influence, geographic location, mobile phone characteristics, picture characteristics, and coffee varieties. Our results show the strong influence of photographer identity and adherence (whether the image collection protocol was followed or not) on model prediction error. Following the protocol can increase model performance from an R2 of 0.48 to 0.73. Additionally, model performance varied significantly depending on photographer identity, with R2 ranging from 0.45 to 0.93. In contrast, factors such as mobile phone characteristics (e.g., frontal camera resolution, flash type, and screen size), using the screen behind the branch to obscure other cherries, coffee varieties, and geographic location did not significantly affect prediction error. These findings demonstrate that data quality in citizen science–based data collection for enhancing model prediction can be achieved through straightforward and comprehensive protocols, customized volunteer training, and regular feedback from experts. Such measures collectively support the robust application of deep learning models in agriculture. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that any mobile device with a camera can contribute to citizen science initiatives, underscoring the potential and scalability of this approach in agricultural research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Trajectory-synchronized diode laser actuation and dose-response field evaluation for precision weed control using a delta robot Robust Approach to Potato Detection in Variable Environments EDM–UNet: edge–aware and dynamically receptive Mamba–UNet for segmentation of Elymus nutans from UAV RGB imagery on the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau A vision-based dual-modal system for adjusting the orientation and plant spacing of ginger with biharmonic depth completion and rapid hand–eye calibration Differences in estimation of sugarcane phenotypic parameters using unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral and hyperspectral data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1