机器人技术和导航如何促进脊柱微创手术?病例系列和叙事回顾。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003352
Esteban Quiceno, Mohamed A R Soliman, Asham Khan, Jeffrey P Mullin, John Pollina
{"title":"机器人技术和导航如何促进脊柱微创手术?病例系列和叙事回顾。","authors":"Esteban Quiceno, Mohamed A R Soliman, Asham Khan, Jeffrey P Mullin, John Pollina","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Image guidance has transformed minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), allowing for safer procedures without excessive bony exposure and reducing radiation exposure for the surgical team. Robotic platforms have enhanced the benefits of navigation by providing high precision and accuracy. Here we describe a case series to demonstrate the accuracy and low complication rates of real-time image-guided robotic-assisted (RA) MISS at a tertiary referral center. In addition, we performed a narrative review on how robotics and navigation facilitate MISS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain data for patients who underwent RA lumbar fusions with real-time navigation for degenerative lumbar pathology between September 1, 2021, and January 1, 2024. The Mazor X Stealth Edition (Medtronic) robotic platform was used. The accuracy of screw placement was determined according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates up to 90 days were recorded. Intraoperative variables and length of stay were compared between open and percutaneous groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 patients underwent insertion of 1156 pedicle screws. The mean patient age was 61.1 ± 11.5 years. The mean total operative time was 195.1 ± 80.8 minutes. The mean operative time per screw was 4.2 ± 1.4 minutes, with a mean of 4.6 ± 1.4 screws per case. The mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 6.4 ± 6.2 seconds. Eighty-five patients (34.4%) underwent open RA pedicle screw placement, and 162 (65.6%) underwent percutaneous RA pedicle screw placement. No differences in operative time, length of stay, fluoroscopy time, and surgical complications were found between groups. Intraoperatively, 2 patients (0.8%) experienced complications and 4 patients (1.6%) developed complications within 90 days. Screw placement accuracy was perfect in 1126 screws (97.4%) and clinically acceptable in 30 screws (2.6%). These results were consistent with those reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic platforms have further enhanced navigation benefits by providing high precision and accuracy, with low complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":"96 3S","pages":"S84-S93"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Robotics and Navigation Facilitate Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery? A Case Series and Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Esteban Quiceno, Mohamed A R Soliman, Asham Khan, Jeffrey P Mullin, John Pollina\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Image guidance has transformed minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), allowing for safer procedures without excessive bony exposure and reducing radiation exposure for the surgical team. Robotic platforms have enhanced the benefits of navigation by providing high precision and accuracy. Here we describe a case series to demonstrate the accuracy and low complication rates of real-time image-guided robotic-assisted (RA) MISS at a tertiary referral center. In addition, we performed a narrative review on how robotics and navigation facilitate MISS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain data for patients who underwent RA lumbar fusions with real-time navigation for degenerative lumbar pathology between September 1, 2021, and January 1, 2024. The Mazor X Stealth Edition (Medtronic) robotic platform was used. The accuracy of screw placement was determined according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates up to 90 days were recorded. Intraoperative variables and length of stay were compared between open and percutaneous groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 patients underwent insertion of 1156 pedicle screws. The mean patient age was 61.1 ± 11.5 years. The mean total operative time was 195.1 ± 80.8 minutes. The mean operative time per screw was 4.2 ± 1.4 minutes, with a mean of 4.6 ± 1.4 screws per case. The mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 6.4 ± 6.2 seconds. Eighty-five patients (34.4%) underwent open RA pedicle screw placement, and 162 (65.6%) underwent percutaneous RA pedicle screw placement. No differences in operative time, length of stay, fluoroscopy time, and surgical complications were found between groups. Intraoperatively, 2 patients (0.8%) experienced complications and 4 patients (1.6%) developed complications within 90 days. Screw placement accuracy was perfect in 1126 screws (97.4%) and clinically acceptable in 30 screws (2.6%). These results were consistent with those reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic platforms have further enhanced navigation benefits by providing high precision and accuracy, with low complication rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"96 3S\",\"pages\":\"S84-S93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Do Robotics and Navigation Facilitate Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery? A Case Series and Narrative Review.

Background and objectives: Image guidance has transformed minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), allowing for safer procedures without excessive bony exposure and reducing radiation exposure for the surgical team. Robotic platforms have enhanced the benefits of navigation by providing high precision and accuracy. Here we describe a case series to demonstrate the accuracy and low complication rates of real-time image-guided robotic-assisted (RA) MISS at a tertiary referral center. In addition, we performed a narrative review on how robotics and navigation facilitate MISS.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain data for patients who underwent RA lumbar fusions with real-time navigation for degenerative lumbar pathology between September 1, 2021, and January 1, 2024. The Mazor X Stealth Edition (Medtronic) robotic platform was used. The accuracy of screw placement was determined according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates up to 90 days were recorded. Intraoperative variables and length of stay were compared between open and percutaneous groups.

Results: A total of 247 patients underwent insertion of 1156 pedicle screws. The mean patient age was 61.1 ± 11.5 years. The mean total operative time was 195.1 ± 80.8 minutes. The mean operative time per screw was 4.2 ± 1.4 minutes, with a mean of 4.6 ± 1.4 screws per case. The mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 6.4 ± 6.2 seconds. Eighty-five patients (34.4%) underwent open RA pedicle screw placement, and 162 (65.6%) underwent percutaneous RA pedicle screw placement. No differences in operative time, length of stay, fluoroscopy time, and surgical complications were found between groups. Intraoperatively, 2 patients (0.8%) experienced complications and 4 patients (1.6%) developed complications within 90 days. Screw placement accuracy was perfect in 1126 screws (97.4%) and clinically acceptable in 30 screws (2.6%). These results were consistent with those reported in the literature.

Conclusion: Robotic platforms have further enhanced navigation benefits by providing high precision and accuracy, with low complication rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Neurosurgery Editors-in-Chief. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Past Presidents. 2024 Neurosurgery Paper of the Year. Honored Guest of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024 Annual Meeting: Henry Brem, MD. Honored Guest of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024 Annual Meeting: Steven L. Giannotta, MD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1