Yeahwa Hong M.D., Ph.D. , Umar Nasim B.S. , Nidhi Iyanna M.P.H. , Ander Dorken-Gallastegi M.D. , Mary E. Keebler M.D. , Edward T. Horn Pharm.D. , Gavin W. Hickey M.D. , David J. Kaczorowski M.D.
{"title":"循环死亡心脏移植后捐赠的耐用左心室辅助装置。","authors":"Yeahwa Hong M.D., Ph.D. , Umar Nasim B.S. , Nidhi Iyanna M.P.H. , Ander Dorken-Gallastegi M.D. , Mary E. Keebler M.D. , Edward T. Horn Pharm.D. , Gavin W. Hickey M.D. , David J. Kaczorowski M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study evaluates outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation in recipients with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients of isolated DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019–3/31/2023. The recipients were stratified by durable LVAD use as a bridge to transplantation. The primary outcome was 1-year post-transplant survival. Sub-group analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of transplant status, device type, and donor type on 1-year survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 703 recipients were included, of which 219 (31.2%) recipients were bridged with a durable LVAD. The recipients of DCD hearts with durable LVADs had significantly lower 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those without durable LVADs (88.4% vs. 93.6%, p=0.017). Among the recipients bridged with durable LVADs, status 4 recipients had significantly improved 1-year survival compared to statuses 2 and 3 recipients, similar to those without durable LVADs. Furthermore, the recipients with HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 had improved survival compared to those with the HeartWare HVAD, similar to those without durable LVADs. Lastly, the DCD and DBD recipients with durable LVADs had comparable 1-year survival (88.4% vs. 89.0%, p=0.763).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recipients of DCD hearts bridged to transplantation with a durable LVAD exhibit reduced early post-transplant survival compared to those without a durable LVAD. However, clinical acuity and device type significantly influence post-transplant outcomes in this vulnerable population. Despite this, candidates with a durable LVAD can safely undergo DCD heart transplantation, achieving early post-transplant survival comparable to those of DBD heart transplantation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"44 7","pages":"Pages 1011-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Durable left ventricular assist device in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Yeahwa Hong M.D., Ph.D. , Umar Nasim B.S. , Nidhi Iyanna M.P.H. , Ander Dorken-Gallastegi M.D. , Mary E. Keebler M.D. , Edward T. Horn Pharm.D. , Gavin W. Hickey M.D. , David J. Kaczorowski M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study evaluates outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation in recipients with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients of isolated DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019–3/31/2023. The recipients were stratified by durable LVAD use as a bridge to transplantation. The primary outcome was 1-year post-transplant survival. Sub-group analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of transplant status, device type, and donor type on 1-year survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 703 recipients were included, of which 219 (31.2%) recipients were bridged with a durable LVAD. The recipients of DCD hearts with durable LVADs had significantly lower 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those without durable LVADs (88.4% vs. 93.6%, p=0.017). Among the recipients bridged with durable LVADs, status 4 recipients had significantly improved 1-year survival compared to statuses 2 and 3 recipients, similar to those without durable LVADs. Furthermore, the recipients with HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 had improved survival compared to those with the HeartWare HVAD, similar to those without durable LVADs. Lastly, the DCD and DBD recipients with durable LVADs had comparable 1-year survival (88.4% vs. 89.0%, p=0.763).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recipients of DCD hearts bridged to transplantation with a durable LVAD exhibit reduced early post-transplant survival compared to those without a durable LVAD. However, clinical acuity and device type significantly influence post-transplant outcomes in this vulnerable population. Despite this, candidates with a durable LVAD can safely undergo DCD heart transplantation, achieving early post-transplant survival comparable to those of DBD heart transplantation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"44 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1011-1021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249825000592\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249825000592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究评估了在循环死亡(DCD)心脏移植后使用持久左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的受者的捐赠结果。方法:查询UNOS注册表,分析2019年1月1日至2023年3月31日期间成人离体DCD心脏移植受者。通过持久的LVAD作为移植的桥梁对受者进行分层。主要终点为移植后1年生存率。亚组分析评估移植状态、器械类型和供体类型对1年生存率的影响。结果:纳入703名受者,其中219名(31.2%)受者使用耐用LVAD桥接。与没有持久lvad的患者相比,具有持久lvad的DCD心脏受者移植后1年生存率显著降低(88.4%比93.6%,p=0.017)。在使用持久lvad的接受者中,与状态2和3的接受者相比,状态4的接受者的1年生存率显著提高,与没有持久lvad的接受者相似。此外,与使用HeartWare HVAD的患者相比,使用HeartMate II和HeartMate 3的患者生存率有所提高,这与没有使用持久lvad的患者相似。最后,DCD和DBD受体与持久lvad的1年生存率相当(88.4% vs 89.0%, p=0.763)。结论:与没有持久LVAD的受者相比,DCD心脏桥接移植与持久LVAD的受者在移植后早期生存率降低。然而,临床敏锐度和器械类型对这一弱势人群移植后的预后有显著影响。尽管如此,具有持久LVAD的候选人可以安全地进行DCD心脏移植,获得与DBD心脏移植相当的早期移植后生存。
Durable left ventricular assist device in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation
Background
This study evaluates outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation in recipients with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
Methods
The UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients of isolated DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019–3/31/2023. The recipients were stratified by durable LVAD use as a bridge to transplantation. The primary outcome was 1-year post-transplant survival. Sub-group analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of transplant status, device type, and donor type on 1-year survival.
Results
A total of 703 recipients were included, of which 219 (31.2%) recipients were bridged with a durable LVAD. The recipients of DCD hearts with durable LVADs had significantly lower 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those without durable LVADs (88.4% vs. 93.6%, p=0.017). Among the recipients bridged with durable LVADs, status 4 recipients had significantly improved 1-year survival compared to statuses 2 and 3 recipients, similar to those without durable LVADs. Furthermore, the recipients with HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 had improved survival compared to those with the HeartWare HVAD, similar to those without durable LVADs. Lastly, the DCD and DBD recipients with durable LVADs had comparable 1-year survival (88.4% vs. 89.0%, p=0.763).
Conclusions
Recipients of DCD hearts bridged to transplantation with a durable LVAD exhibit reduced early post-transplant survival compared to those without a durable LVAD. However, clinical acuity and device type significantly influence post-transplant outcomes in this vulnerable population. Despite this, candidates with a durable LVAD can safely undergo DCD heart transplantation, achieving early post-transplant survival comparable to those of DBD heart transplantation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.