院外休克性心脏骤停患者的胺碘酮剂量

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110534
Georg Gelbenegger , Sheldon Cheskes , Bernd Jilma , Markus Zeitlinger , Steve Lin , Ian R. Drennan , Anselm Jorda
{"title":"院外休克性心脏骤停患者的胺碘酮剂量","authors":"Georg Gelbenegger ,&nbsp;Sheldon Cheskes ,&nbsp;Bernd Jilma ,&nbsp;Markus Zeitlinger ,&nbsp;Steve Lin ,&nbsp;Ian R. Drennan ,&nbsp;Anselm Jorda","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Amiodarone is used in shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the ideal dose is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an analysis from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (2011–2015). Patients with shockable OHCA who received 5 or more defibrillation attempts and treatment with 300 or 450 mg of amiodarone were included. Outcomes were ROSC at ED arrival, survival at hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic function at discharge. Group-differences were adjusted for using inverse probability weighting and a multiple logistic regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The present study included 910 patients; 426 received amiodarone 300 mg and 484 received amiodarone 450 mg. The amiodarone 300 mg group had a higher estimated probability of ROSC at ED arrival as compared with the amiodarone 450 mg group (30.8% [95% CI, 26.6–35.1] vs 24.2% [95% CI, 20.5–27.9], respectively; adjusted probability difference, 6.6% (0.9–12.3), <em>p</em> = 0.0234). The group differences in survival at hospital discharge (21.3% [95% CI, 17.2–25.4] vs 18.0% [95% CI, 14.6–21.5]; adjusted probability difference, 3.3% [−2.3–8.8]) and favorable neurologic outcome at discharge (16.5% [95% CI, 12.9–20.2] vs 12.7% [95% CI, 9.5–16.0]; adjusted probability difference, 3.8% [95% CI, −1.2–8.7]) did not reach statistical significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with shockable OHCA who received 5 or more defibrillation attempts, a dose of amiodarone 300 mg was associated with a similar survival compared with a total dose of amiodarone 450 mg. Further study is needed to evaluate the need for a second administration of amiodarone in patients with shockable OHCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 110534"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amiodarone dose in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest\",\"authors\":\"Georg Gelbenegger ,&nbsp;Sheldon Cheskes ,&nbsp;Bernd Jilma ,&nbsp;Markus Zeitlinger ,&nbsp;Steve Lin ,&nbsp;Ian R. Drennan ,&nbsp;Anselm Jorda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Amiodarone is used in shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the ideal dose is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an analysis from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (2011–2015). Patients with shockable OHCA who received 5 or more defibrillation attempts and treatment with 300 or 450 mg of amiodarone were included. Outcomes were ROSC at ED arrival, survival at hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic function at discharge. Group-differences were adjusted for using inverse probability weighting and a multiple logistic regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The present study included 910 patients; 426 received amiodarone 300 mg and 484 received amiodarone 450 mg. The amiodarone 300 mg group had a higher estimated probability of ROSC at ED arrival as compared with the amiodarone 450 mg group (30.8% [95% CI, 26.6–35.1] vs 24.2% [95% CI, 20.5–27.9], respectively; adjusted probability difference, 6.6% (0.9–12.3), <em>p</em> = 0.0234). The group differences in survival at hospital discharge (21.3% [95% CI, 17.2–25.4] vs 18.0% [95% CI, 14.6–21.5]; adjusted probability difference, 3.3% [−2.3–8.8]) and favorable neurologic outcome at discharge (16.5% [95% CI, 12.9–20.2] vs 12.7% [95% CI, 9.5–16.0]; adjusted probability difference, 3.8% [95% CI, −1.2–8.7]) did not reach statistical significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with shockable OHCA who received 5 or more defibrillation attempts, a dose of amiodarone 300 mg was associated with a similar survival compared with a total dose of amiodarone 450 mg. Further study is needed to evaluate the need for a second administration of amiodarone in patients with shockable OHCA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225000462\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225000462","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胺碘酮用于治疗院外心脏骤停(OHCA),但理想剂量尚不清楚。方法:这是一项来自复苏结局协会心脏流行病学登记处(2011-2015)的分析。接受5次及以上除颤尝试和300或450 mg胺碘酮治疗的休克性OHCA患者被纳入研究。结果是到达ED时ROSC,出院时生存,出院时良好的神经功能。使用逆概率加权和多元逻辑回归模型调整组间差异。结果:本研究纳入910例患者;426人接受胺碘酮300毫克,484人接受胺碘酮450毫克。与胺碘酮450 mg组相比,300 mg组在ED到达时ROSC的估计概率更高(分别为30.8% [95% CI, 26.6-35.1]和24.2% [95% CI, 20.5-27.9];调整后的概率差为6.6% (0.9-12.3),p=0.0234)。出院时生存率组间差异(21.3% [95% CI, 17.2-25.4] vs 18.0% [95% CI, 14.6-21.5];调整概率差,3.3%[-2.3-8.8])和出院时良好的神经转归(16.5% [95% CI, 12.9-20.2] vs 12.7% [95% CI, 9.5-16.0];调整后的概率差为3.8% [95% CI, -1.2-8.7]),未达到统计学意义。结论:在接受5次或5次以上除颤尝试的休克性OHCA患者中,与总剂量为450 mg的胺碘酮相比,300 mg的胺碘酮剂量与相似的生存期相关。需要进一步的研究来评估休克性OHCA患者是否需要第二次给药胺碘酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Amiodarone dose in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background

Amiodarone is used in shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the ideal dose is unknown.

Methods

This was an analysis from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (2011–2015). Patients with shockable OHCA who received 5 or more defibrillation attempts and treatment with 300 or 450 mg of amiodarone were included. Outcomes were ROSC at ED arrival, survival at hospital discharge, and favorable neurologic function at discharge. Group-differences were adjusted for using inverse probability weighting and a multiple logistic regression model.

Results

The present study included 910 patients; 426 received amiodarone 300 mg and 484 received amiodarone 450 mg. The amiodarone 300 mg group had a higher estimated probability of ROSC at ED arrival as compared with the amiodarone 450 mg group (30.8% [95% CI, 26.6–35.1] vs 24.2% [95% CI, 20.5–27.9], respectively; adjusted probability difference, 6.6% (0.9–12.3), p = 0.0234). The group differences in survival at hospital discharge (21.3% [95% CI, 17.2–25.4] vs 18.0% [95% CI, 14.6–21.5]; adjusted probability difference, 3.3% [−2.3–8.8]) and favorable neurologic outcome at discharge (16.5% [95% CI, 12.9–20.2] vs 12.7% [95% CI, 9.5–16.0]; adjusted probability difference, 3.8% [95% CI, −1.2–8.7]) did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

In patients with shockable OHCA who received 5 or more defibrillation attempts, a dose of amiodarone 300 mg was associated with a similar survival compared with a total dose of amiodarone 450 mg. Further study is needed to evaluate the need for a second administration of amiodarone in patients with shockable OHCA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Decline in rescue breathing and its impact on outcomes in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to drowning: a nationwide study, 2012–2023 Public defibrillators: high investment, low return – lowering the cost per shock – the D€FI-CO$T study A systematic review of mortality and severe morbidities following newborn chest compressions at birth A potential new challenge for future basic life support guidelines: the inequity of resuscitation following drowning Pressurizing the lungs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a matter of life and breath
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1