句子语境信息性的变化影响其与前言亚范畴信息的整合。

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1037/xlm0001443
Wednesday Bushong, T Florian Jaeger
{"title":"句子语境信息性的变化影响其与前言亚范畴信息的整合。","authors":"Wednesday Bushong, T Florian Jaeger","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spoken language understanding requires the integration of incoming speech with representations of the preceding context. How rich the information is that listeners maintain in these contextual representations has been a long-standing question. Under one view, subcategorical information about the preceding input-including any uncertainty about the underlying categories-is quickly discarded due to memory limitations. Alternative views hold that listeners maintain some subcategorical information far beyond word boundaries. This would facilitate more effective integration with subsequent context, under the assumption that subsequent context is informative about the preceding input. We thus ask whether listeners are sensitive to changes in the informativity of subsequent context by changing the expected utility of subcategorical information maintenance. In three experiments, we manipulate how informative subsequent context is about words that occur six to nine syllables earlier. We find that reduced informativity leads listeners to down-weight the importance of subsequent context. This suggests that listeners can adjust the degree to which they maintain subcategorical information. We do, however, also identify alternative interpretations that affect not only the present results but also the interpretation of previous work on subcategorical information maintenance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1968-1989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in informativity of sentential context affects its integration with subcategorical information about preceding speech.\",\"authors\":\"Wednesday Bushong, T Florian Jaeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spoken language understanding requires the integration of incoming speech with representations of the preceding context. How rich the information is that listeners maintain in these contextual representations has been a long-standing question. Under one view, subcategorical information about the preceding input-including any uncertainty about the underlying categories-is quickly discarded due to memory limitations. Alternative views hold that listeners maintain some subcategorical information far beyond word boundaries. This would facilitate more effective integration with subsequent context, under the assumption that subsequent context is informative about the preceding input. We thus ask whether listeners are sensitive to changes in the informativity of subsequent context by changing the expected utility of subcategorical information maintenance. In three experiments, we manipulate how informative subsequent context is about words that occur six to nine syllables earlier. We find that reduced informativity leads listeners to down-weight the importance of subsequent context. This suggests that listeners can adjust the degree to which they maintain subcategorical information. We do, however, also identify alternative interpretations that affect not only the present results but also the interpretation of previous work on subcategorical information maintenance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1968-1989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001443\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口语理解需要将进入的言语与前一语境的表征结合起来。听众在这些语境表征中保留的信息有多丰富一直是一个长期存在的问题。在一种观点下,由于内存限制,关于前面输入的子类别信息(包括关于底层类别的任何不确定性)很快就会被丢弃。另一种观点认为,听者保留了一些远远超出单词边界的亚分类信息。这将促进与后续上下文的更有效集成,前提是后续上下文提供了关于前面输入的信息。因此,我们询问听者是否通过改变亚分类信息维护的预期效用而对后续上下文的信息性变化敏感。在三个实验中,我们对出现在6到9个音节之前的单词的后续语境的信息量进行了控制。我们发现,信息性的降低会导致听者低估后续语境的重要性。这表明听者可以调整他们保持亚分类信息的程度。然而,我们也确定了其他解释,这些解释不仅影响目前的结果,而且影响对以前关于亚分类信息维护的工作的解释。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in informativity of sentential context affects its integration with subcategorical information about preceding speech.

Spoken language understanding requires the integration of incoming speech with representations of the preceding context. How rich the information is that listeners maintain in these contextual representations has been a long-standing question. Under one view, subcategorical information about the preceding input-including any uncertainty about the underlying categories-is quickly discarded due to memory limitations. Alternative views hold that listeners maintain some subcategorical information far beyond word boundaries. This would facilitate more effective integration with subsequent context, under the assumption that subsequent context is informative about the preceding input. We thus ask whether listeners are sensitive to changes in the informativity of subsequent context by changing the expected utility of subcategorical information maintenance. In three experiments, we manipulate how informative subsequent context is about words that occur six to nine syllables earlier. We find that reduced informativity leads listeners to down-weight the importance of subsequent context. This suggests that listeners can adjust the degree to which they maintain subcategorical information. We do, however, also identify alternative interpretations that affect not only the present results but also the interpretation of previous work on subcategorical information maintenance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in attention and learning: A latent variable analysis. Age-related differences in the stability of categorization performance and prototype versus exemplar strategy use. Integrating action-effect episodes into long-term memory as a function of control. The games words and contexts play: How readers navigate syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. Attention, voluntary saccade, or long-term fixation: None of them confirms visual working memory consolidation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1