单任务和双任务条件下中老年人步态域的比较分析

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.004
Pei-Fang Tang , Emily Wilford , Chien-Kuang Tu , Yen-Tzu Wu
{"title":"单任务和双任务条件下中老年人步态域的比较分析","authors":"Pei-Fang Tang ,&nbsp;Emily Wilford ,&nbsp;Chien-Kuang Tu ,&nbsp;Yen-Tzu Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dual-task gaits are linked to falls in older individuals, but their underlying structure is unknown compared to single-task gaits. We employed principal component analysis (PCA) to discover independent domains underlying single- and dual-task gaits in cognitively healthy community-dwelling people over 45.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One hundred eighty-nine independent individuals (aged 45–80) completed health surveys, physical and cognitive tests, and walking evaluations under single-task, motor dual-task, and cognitive dual-task conditions. We applied PCA to 17 spatiotemporal gait parameters to identify independent domains for each gait. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine demographic, physical, and cognitive characteristics associated with domain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results revealed six independent domains consistent across all three gait types: rhythm, variability, phase, pace, base of support (BOS), and asymmetry. These domains accounted for 77.2–83.8 % of the overall gait variance. Rhythm, variability, and phase were the top three domains for all three gait types. Pace was the fourth domain for single- and motor dual-task gaits, while asymmetry held this position for the cognitive dual-task gait. In all three gaits, male sex and heavier weight were associated with greater BOS scores. Taller height and shorter five-times-sit-to-stand test (5XSST) time were associated with greater pace scores, while heavier weight was additionally linked to greater phase scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Notably, greater variability domain scores in the cognitive dual-task gait were uniquely associated with poorer executive function, balance, and shorter 5XSST time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>PCA results revealed consistent gait domains across single-, dual-, and cognitive dual-task conditions in older adults. These findings support the feasibility of using standardized, streamlined assessments focusing on these core domains in geriatric gait assessments. Findings of the unique cognitive dual-task gait characteristics highlight the importance of assessing gait variability and asymmetry of this gait for fall risk screening and prevention interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of gait domains in middle-aged and older adults under single- and dual-task conditions\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Fang Tang ,&nbsp;Emily Wilford ,&nbsp;Chien-Kuang Tu ,&nbsp;Yen-Tzu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dual-task gaits are linked to falls in older individuals, but their underlying structure is unknown compared to single-task gaits. We employed principal component analysis (PCA) to discover independent domains underlying single- and dual-task gaits in cognitively healthy community-dwelling people over 45.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One hundred eighty-nine independent individuals (aged 45–80) completed health surveys, physical and cognitive tests, and walking evaluations under single-task, motor dual-task, and cognitive dual-task conditions. We applied PCA to 17 spatiotemporal gait parameters to identify independent domains for each gait. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine demographic, physical, and cognitive characteristics associated with domain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results revealed six independent domains consistent across all three gait types: rhythm, variability, phase, pace, base of support (BOS), and asymmetry. These domains accounted for 77.2–83.8 % of the overall gait variance. Rhythm, variability, and phase were the top three domains for all three gait types. Pace was the fourth domain for single- and motor dual-task gaits, while asymmetry held this position for the cognitive dual-task gait. In all three gaits, male sex and heavier weight were associated with greater BOS scores. Taller height and shorter five-times-sit-to-stand test (5XSST) time were associated with greater pace scores, while heavier weight was additionally linked to greater phase scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Notably, greater variability domain scores in the cognitive dual-task gait were uniquely associated with poorer executive function, balance, and shorter 5XSST time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>PCA results revealed consistent gait domains across single-, dual-, and cognitive dual-task conditions in older adults. These findings support the feasibility of using standardized, streamlined assessments focusing on these core domains in geriatric gait assessments. Findings of the unique cognitive dual-task gait characteristics highlight the importance of assessing gait variability and asymmetry of this gait for fall risk screening and prevention interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096663622500092X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096663622500092X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双任务步态与老年人跌倒有关,但与单任务步态相比,其潜在结构尚不清楚。我们采用主成分分析(PCA)来发现45岁以上认知健康的社区居民的单任务和双任务步态的独立域。方法89名年龄在45-80岁的独立受试者在单任务、运动双任务和认知双任务条件下完成健康调查、身体和认知测试以及行走评估。我们将PCA应用于17个时空步态参数,以识别每个步态的独立域。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与领域分数相关的人口统计学、物理和认知特征。结果揭示了所有三种步态类型中一致的六个独立域:节奏、变异性、相位、步伐、支撑基础(BOS)和不对称性。这些区域占总体步态方差的77.2-83.8 %。节律、变异性和相位是所有三种步态类型的前三个域。在单任务和运动双任务步态中,速度是第四个区域,而在认知双任务步态中,不对称占据了这个位置。在所有三种步态中,男性性别和较重的体重与较高的BOS得分有关。较高的身高和较短的五次坐立测试(5XSST)时间与较高的步速得分相关,而较重的体重与较高的相位得分相关(p <; 0.05)。值得注意的是,认知双任务步态中较大的变变性域得分与较差的执行功能、平衡和较短的5XSST时间唯一相关(p <; 0.05)。epca结果显示,老年人在单任务、双任务和认知双任务条件下的步态域是一致的。这些发现支持了在老年步态评估中使用标准化、流线型评估的可行性,这些评估集中在这些核心领域。独特的认知双任务步态特征的研究结果强调了评估步态变异性和步态不对称性对跌倒风险筛查和预防干预的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of gait domains in middle-aged and older adults under single- and dual-task conditions

Background

Dual-task gaits are linked to falls in older individuals, but their underlying structure is unknown compared to single-task gaits. We employed principal component analysis (PCA) to discover independent domains underlying single- and dual-task gaits in cognitively healthy community-dwelling people over 45.

Methods

One hundred eighty-nine independent individuals (aged 45–80) completed health surveys, physical and cognitive tests, and walking evaluations under single-task, motor dual-task, and cognitive dual-task conditions. We applied PCA to 17 spatiotemporal gait parameters to identify independent domains for each gait. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine demographic, physical, and cognitive characteristics associated with domain scores.

Results

The results revealed six independent domains consistent across all three gait types: rhythm, variability, phase, pace, base of support (BOS), and asymmetry. These domains accounted for 77.2–83.8 % of the overall gait variance. Rhythm, variability, and phase were the top three domains for all three gait types. Pace was the fourth domain for single- and motor dual-task gaits, while asymmetry held this position for the cognitive dual-task gait. In all three gaits, male sex and heavier weight were associated with greater BOS scores. Taller height and shorter five-times-sit-to-stand test (5XSST) time were associated with greater pace scores, while heavier weight was additionally linked to greater phase scores (p < 0.05). Notably, greater variability domain scores in the cognitive dual-task gait were uniquely associated with poorer executive function, balance, and shorter 5XSST time (p < 0.05).

Significance

PCA results revealed consistent gait domains across single-, dual-, and cognitive dual-task conditions in older adults. These findings support the feasibility of using standardized, streamlined assessments focusing on these core domains in geriatric gait assessments. Findings of the unique cognitive dual-task gait characteristics highlight the importance of assessing gait variability and asymmetry of this gait for fall risk screening and prevention interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Upper body kinematics during walking and their relationship to fall risk after stroke Optimizing focal vibration therapy for balance and gait: A systematic review Impact of height-induced postural threat and arm movement strategies while performing a semi-static balance task: Comparison of postural control and emotional state outcomes between children and young adults Predicting minimum toe clearance in older adults on different surfaces from level ground data: A machine learning approach Effect of visual cues on gait and muscle coactivation asymmetry in individuals with Parkinson's disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1