考虑项目组合中风险传播损失的风险响应策略选择框架

IF 6.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2025.110935
Zhong Shen , Xingmei Li , Dongqing Jia , Xiaoyan Lv
{"title":"考虑项目组合中风险传播损失的风险响应策略选择框架","authors":"Zhong Shen ,&nbsp;Xingmei Li ,&nbsp;Dongqing Jia ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2025.110935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The successful implementation of project portfolio calls for effective risk management, in which how to select appropriate strategies to respond to upcoming risks, is called risk response strategy (RRS) selection. However, two deficiencies are discovered in current RRS selection research. The one is that researchers ignore the phenomenon of risk propagation and the risk losses it brings, which makes some risks with propagation potential underestimated in the process of risk evaluation. The other is that lacking approach to quantify the loss caused by risk propagation, which is not conducive to assessing risks and selecting RRSs from a quantitative perspective. Under this circumstance, this paper firstly proposes a framework of RRS selection considering the loss caused by risk propagation in the project portfolio. In the proposed framework, Bayesian network and fuzzy theory are used to measuring the probability of risk propagation between projects. Subsequently, the propagation process of risks among projects is generated, based on which the probability and time point of loss caused by each risk are calculated. Finally, the losses caused by risk propagation before and after applying risk response strategies are quantified, and an RRS selection model to maximize the recovered risk loss is constructed. The analysis of a case study demonstrates that 1) with the increase of available funds used to respond to risks, the recovered risk loss by each unit of fund declines; 2) before the implementation of projects, the decision-maker should select the RRSs that can recover more direct risk losses; 3) when projects have been implemented, decision-maker needs to focus on the indirect losses caused by risk propagation and select RRSs that can block the propagation of risks in the project portfolio.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110935"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework of risk response strategy selection considering the loss caused by risk propagation in the project portfolio\",\"authors\":\"Zhong Shen ,&nbsp;Xingmei Li ,&nbsp;Dongqing Jia ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2025.110935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The successful implementation of project portfolio calls for effective risk management, in which how to select appropriate strategies to respond to upcoming risks, is called risk response strategy (RRS) selection. However, two deficiencies are discovered in current RRS selection research. The one is that researchers ignore the phenomenon of risk propagation and the risk losses it brings, which makes some risks with propagation potential underestimated in the process of risk evaluation. The other is that lacking approach to quantify the loss caused by risk propagation, which is not conducive to assessing risks and selecting RRSs from a quantitative perspective. Under this circumstance, this paper firstly proposes a framework of RRS selection considering the loss caused by risk propagation in the project portfolio. In the proposed framework, Bayesian network and fuzzy theory are used to measuring the probability of risk propagation between projects. Subsequently, the propagation process of risks among projects is generated, based on which the probability and time point of loss caused by each risk are calculated. Finally, the losses caused by risk propagation before and after applying risk response strategies are quantified, and an RRS selection model to maximize the recovered risk loss is constructed. The analysis of a case study demonstrates that 1) with the increase of available funds used to respond to risks, the recovered risk loss by each unit of fund declines; 2) before the implementation of projects, the decision-maker should select the RRSs that can recover more direct risk losses; 3) when projects have been implemented, decision-maker needs to focus on the indirect losses caused by risk propagation and select RRSs that can block the propagation of risks in the project portfolio.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225000816\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835225000816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

项目组合的成功实施需要有效的风险管理,其中如何选择合适的策略来应对即将到来的风险,称为风险响应策略(RRS)的选择。然而,目前的RRS选择研究存在两个不足。一是研究者忽视了风险传播现象及其带来的风险损失,使得在风险评估过程中低估了一些具有传播潜力的风险。二是缺乏对风险传播造成的损失进行量化的方法,不利于从定量的角度进行风险评估和rrs的选择。在此背景下,本文首先提出了一个考虑项目组合风险传播损失的RRS选择框架。在该框架中,采用贝叶斯网络和模糊理论来度量项目间风险传播的概率。然后,生成风险在项目间的传播过程,并以此为基础计算各风险造成损失的概率和时间点。最后,量化了应用风险应对策略前后风险传播所造成的损失,构建了以风险损失恢复最大化为目标的RRS选择模型。案例分析表明:1)随着可用资金的增加,各单位资金可收回的风险损失呈下降趋势;2)在项目实施前,决策者应选择能够挽回更直接风险损失的rrs;3)当项目已经实施时,决策者需要关注风险传播所造成的间接损失,选择能够阻断项目组合中风险传播的rrs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework of risk response strategy selection considering the loss caused by risk propagation in the project portfolio
The successful implementation of project portfolio calls for effective risk management, in which how to select appropriate strategies to respond to upcoming risks, is called risk response strategy (RRS) selection. However, two deficiencies are discovered in current RRS selection research. The one is that researchers ignore the phenomenon of risk propagation and the risk losses it brings, which makes some risks with propagation potential underestimated in the process of risk evaluation. The other is that lacking approach to quantify the loss caused by risk propagation, which is not conducive to assessing risks and selecting RRSs from a quantitative perspective. Under this circumstance, this paper firstly proposes a framework of RRS selection considering the loss caused by risk propagation in the project portfolio. In the proposed framework, Bayesian network and fuzzy theory are used to measuring the probability of risk propagation between projects. Subsequently, the propagation process of risks among projects is generated, based on which the probability and time point of loss caused by each risk are calculated. Finally, the losses caused by risk propagation before and after applying risk response strategies are quantified, and an RRS selection model to maximize the recovered risk loss is constructed. The analysis of a case study demonstrates that 1) with the increase of available funds used to respond to risks, the recovered risk loss by each unit of fund declines; 2) before the implementation of projects, the decision-maker should select the RRSs that can recover more direct risk losses; 3) when projects have been implemented, decision-maker needs to focus on the indirect losses caused by risk propagation and select RRSs that can block the propagation of risks in the project portfolio.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Optimization models for medical waste management: Before and during COVID-19 pandemic BuildCES: A conceptual BIM–Blockchain–AI framework for transparent and predictive construction management Joint optimization of inspection scheduling and imperfect maintenance under stochastic repair effects and regime-dependent feasibility Robust optimization for the integrated berth allocation, quay crane assignment, and yard assignment problem Flexible allocation strategy for repetitive project scheduling based on constraint programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1