使用多标准决策分析来区分苏格兰北海的遗留井,以最大限度地减少碳捕获和储存的遏制风险

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104336
Benjamin Pullen , Aaron Cahill , Daniel Arnold
{"title":"使用多标准决策分析来区分苏格兰北海的遗留井,以最大限度地减少碳捕获和储存的遏制风险","authors":"Benjamin Pullen ,&nbsp;Aaron Cahill ,&nbsp;Daniel Arnold","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a critical technology for mitigating climate change by securely storing CO₂ emissions underground. Former oil and gas fields are prime candidates for CCS due to their proven storage capacity, existing infrastructure, and favourable geology. However, legacy wells in these fields pose significant containment risks. Assessing these risks typically requires site-specific evaluations, which are time-intensive and impractical at scale, hindering systematic regional assessments, particularly in areas where CCS is expected to expand.</div><div>We developed a weight sum model (WSM) multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to evaluate the containment risks of 12,264 legacy oil and gas wells in the North Sea. The model was informed by expert elicitation involving 54 global subject matter experts, 70 % of whom are industry professionals with over a decade of CCS experience. Wellbores were assigned consideration scores reflecting their containment risks based on geospatial, temporal, and engineering factors, weighted by expert consensus. The mean consideration score was 0.55 (range: 0–1), with outlier thresholds at 0.74 and 0.36, identifying 506 wells with significantly higher or lower risks to containment.</div><div>Among Scotland's nine most promising CO₂ storage sites, the Miller Oil Field and Captain Sandstone Fairway represent the highest and lowest cases of consideration score, respectively. By integrating expert knowledge into an MCDA framework, this approach provides a systematic method to prioritise wellbores for further evaluation based on risk profiles, supplementing traditional case-by-case assessments. It offers a scalable solution for managing containment risks across domains with multiple planned CCS projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104336"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating legacy wellbores in the scottish north sea using multi-criteria decision analysis with a view to minimising containment risk for carbon capture and storage\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Pullen ,&nbsp;Aaron Cahill ,&nbsp;Daniel Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a critical technology for mitigating climate change by securely storing CO₂ emissions underground. Former oil and gas fields are prime candidates for CCS due to their proven storage capacity, existing infrastructure, and favourable geology. However, legacy wells in these fields pose significant containment risks. Assessing these risks typically requires site-specific evaluations, which are time-intensive and impractical at scale, hindering systematic regional assessments, particularly in areas where CCS is expected to expand.</div><div>We developed a weight sum model (WSM) multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to evaluate the containment risks of 12,264 legacy oil and gas wells in the North Sea. The model was informed by expert elicitation involving 54 global subject matter experts, 70 % of whom are industry professionals with over a decade of CCS experience. Wellbores were assigned consideration scores reflecting their containment risks based on geospatial, temporal, and engineering factors, weighted by expert consensus. The mean consideration score was 0.55 (range: 0–1), with outlier thresholds at 0.74 and 0.36, identifying 506 wells with significantly higher or lower risks to containment.</div><div>Among Scotland's nine most promising CO₂ storage sites, the Miller Oil Field and Captain Sandstone Fairway represent the highest and lowest cases of consideration score, respectively. By integrating expert knowledge into an MCDA framework, this approach provides a systematic method to prioritise wellbores for further evaluation based on risk profiles, supplementing traditional case-by-case assessments. It offers a scalable solution for managing containment risks across domains with multiple planned CCS projects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"142 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625000349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625000349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳捕获与封存(CCS)是一项通过将二氧化碳排放安全地储存在地下来缓解气候变化的关键技术。由于已探明的储存能力、现有的基础设施和有利的地质条件,以前的油气田是CCS的主要候选者。然而,这些油田的老井存在很大的密封风险。评估这些风险通常需要对具体地点进行评估,这既耗时又不切实际,阻碍了系统的区域评估,特别是在CCS有望扩展的地区。我们开发了一种加权和模型(WSM)多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法来评估北海12264口传统油气井的密封风险。该模型是由54名全球主题专家的专家启发得出的,其中70%是拥有超过十年CCS经验的行业专业人士。根据地理空间、时间和工程因素,根据专家共识进行加权,为井筒分配了反映其遏制风险的考虑分数。平均考虑得分为0.55(范围:0-1),异常阈值为0.74和0.36,确定了506口油井的密封风险显著较高或较低。在苏格兰最有希望的9个CO₂储存地点中,米勒油田和沙岩船长航道分别代表了最高和最低的考虑得分。通过将专家知识整合到MCDA框架中,该方法提供了一种系统的方法,可以根据风险概况对井眼进行优先级进一步评估,补充了传统的个案评估。它提供了一个可扩展的解决方案,用于管理多个计划中的CCS项目跨域的遏制风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentiating legacy wellbores in the scottish north sea using multi-criteria decision analysis with a view to minimising containment risk for carbon capture and storage
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a critical technology for mitigating climate change by securely storing CO₂ emissions underground. Former oil and gas fields are prime candidates for CCS due to their proven storage capacity, existing infrastructure, and favourable geology. However, legacy wells in these fields pose significant containment risks. Assessing these risks typically requires site-specific evaluations, which are time-intensive and impractical at scale, hindering systematic regional assessments, particularly in areas where CCS is expected to expand.
We developed a weight sum model (WSM) multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to evaluate the containment risks of 12,264 legacy oil and gas wells in the North Sea. The model was informed by expert elicitation involving 54 global subject matter experts, 70 % of whom are industry professionals with over a decade of CCS experience. Wellbores were assigned consideration scores reflecting their containment risks based on geospatial, temporal, and engineering factors, weighted by expert consensus. The mean consideration score was 0.55 (range: 0–1), with outlier thresholds at 0.74 and 0.36, identifying 506 wells with significantly higher or lower risks to containment.
Among Scotland's nine most promising CO₂ storage sites, the Miller Oil Field and Captain Sandstone Fairway represent the highest and lowest cases of consideration score, respectively. By integrating expert knowledge into an MCDA framework, this approach provides a systematic method to prioritise wellbores for further evaluation based on risk profiles, supplementing traditional case-by-case assessments. It offers a scalable solution for managing containment risks across domains with multiple planned CCS projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
CESAR1 solvent degradation in pilot and laboratory scale Editorial Board Reassessing historical gas occurrences considering CO2 geological storage, a case study of the Cuiabá Paulista occurrence, Brazil Steady-state simulation of large-scale pipeline networks for CCUS applications Geochemical framework for CO2 mineralization in coastal aquifers: Lessons from the Coda Terminal project, Iceland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1