人工耳蜗植入术后早期拟合的可行性探讨及与经典拟合方法的比较

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112273
Ahmet Cansu , Muzaffer Kanlıkama , Hüseyin Deniz
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入术后早期拟合的可行性探讨及与经典拟合方法的比较","authors":"Ahmet Cansu ,&nbsp;Muzaffer Kanlıkama ,&nbsp;Hüseyin Deniz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the feasibility of early activation of the sound processor (1 day postoperatively) after cochlear implant surgery and to compare the electrophysiological parameters with those of the classical method (activation 1 month postoperatively).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This prospective study included 69 patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery between March 2019 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: early fitting and classic fitting (control group). In the early fitting group, the sound processor was activated 1 day after surgery, whereas in the classic fitting group, it was activated 4 weeks after surgery. The study investigated whether early fitting had a negative effect on wound healing and compared electrophysiological parameters between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In both groups, the most common early side effects were pain, redness, and swelling. In both groups, 2 patients (5.7 %) required flap revision. The electrode impedance (EI) and most comfortable loudness level (MCL) values were lower in the early fitting group than in the classic fitting group at the initial measurements. However, no significant difference was observed in measurements after 1 month.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early fitting of the sound processor after surgery did not adversely affect wound healing and is considered a viable approach. Although the electrode impedance and MCL values were lower in the early fitting group in the short term, similar results were obtained in the long term. Early fitting may reduce the procedure cost, particularly for patients who travel long distances to reach the treatment center.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of feasibility of early fitting after cochlear implantation and comparison with classical fitting method\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Cansu ,&nbsp;Muzaffer Kanlıkama ,&nbsp;Hüseyin Deniz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the feasibility of early activation of the sound processor (1 day postoperatively) after cochlear implant surgery and to compare the electrophysiological parameters with those of the classical method (activation 1 month postoperatively).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This prospective study included 69 patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery between March 2019 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: early fitting and classic fitting (control group). In the early fitting group, the sound processor was activated 1 day after surgery, whereas in the classic fitting group, it was activated 4 weeks after surgery. The study investigated whether early fitting had a negative effect on wound healing and compared electrophysiological parameters between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In both groups, the most common early side effects were pain, redness, and swelling. In both groups, 2 patients (5.7 %) required flap revision. The electrode impedance (EI) and most comfortable loudness level (MCL) values were lower in the early fitting group than in the classic fitting group at the initial measurements. However, no significant difference was observed in measurements after 1 month.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early fitting of the sound processor after surgery did not adversely affect wound healing and is considered a viable approach. Although the electrode impedance and MCL values were lower in the early fitting group in the short term, similar results were obtained in the long term. Early fitting may reduce the procedure cost, particularly for patients who travel long distances to reach the treatment center.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625000606\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587625000606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨人工耳蜗术后早期激活声处理器(术后1天)的可行性,并与经典方法(术后1个月)的电生理参数进行比较。方法本前瞻性研究纳入了2019年3月至2022年8月期间接受人工耳蜗手术的69例患者。患者分为早期拟合组和经典拟合组(对照组)。早期拟合组在术后1天激活声音处理器,经典拟合组在术后4周激活声音处理器。本研究探讨早期拟合是否对创面愈合有负面影响,并比较两组间的电生理参数。结果两组患者早期最常见的副作用均为疼痛、红肿。两组均有2例(5.7%)患者需要皮瓣修复。在初始测量时,早期拟合组的电极阻抗(EI)和最舒适响度水平(MCL)值低于经典拟合组。然而,1个月后的测量结果无显著差异。结论术后早期安装声处理器对创面愈合无不良影响,是一种可行的方法。虽然早期拟合组的电极阻抗和MCL值在短期内较低,但在长期内得到了相似的结果。早期安装可以降低手术成本,特别是对于那些长途跋涉到达治疗中心的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of feasibility of early fitting after cochlear implantation and comparison with classical fitting method

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility of early activation of the sound processor (1 day postoperatively) after cochlear implant surgery and to compare the electrophysiological parameters with those of the classical method (activation 1 month postoperatively).

Method

This prospective study included 69 patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery between March 2019 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: early fitting and classic fitting (control group). In the early fitting group, the sound processor was activated 1 day after surgery, whereas in the classic fitting group, it was activated 4 weeks after surgery. The study investigated whether early fitting had a negative effect on wound healing and compared electrophysiological parameters between the two groups.

Results

In both groups, the most common early side effects were pain, redness, and swelling. In both groups, 2 patients (5.7 %) required flap revision. The electrode impedance (EI) and most comfortable loudness level (MCL) values were lower in the early fitting group than in the classic fitting group at the initial measurements. However, no significant difference was observed in measurements after 1 month.

Conclusion

Early fitting of the sound processor after surgery did not adversely affect wound healing and is considered a viable approach. Although the electrode impedance and MCL values were lower in the early fitting group in the short term, similar results were obtained in the long term. Early fitting may reduce the procedure cost, particularly for patients who travel long distances to reach the treatment center.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
期刊最新文献
Mediating effects of postoperative complications in children with high-risk obstructive apnea following adenotonsillectomy Adapting and validating the ETDQ-7 for the pediatric population A novel surgical technique for the management of recurrent thyroglossal duct cysts using Dakin's solution packing Management of pediatric sialorrhea: A systematic review with a stepwise evidence-based clinical algorithm Surgeons’ perspectives on patient-specific 3D-printed temporal bone models: What do we need?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1