{"title":"债券市场自由化对会计稳健性的影响","authors":"Renhui Fu, Fang Gao, Yanhui Wang","doi":"10.1111/jbfa.12817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a quasi-natural experimental setting in which Bond Connect allows foreign investors to trade in the Chinese interbank bond market, we predict and find that firms subject to the program increase their accounting conservatism. Further analyses suggest that the increase is concentrated among firms with higher litigation risk, more corporate site visits and greater media attention from overseas, suggesting that foreign bond investors affect firms through the channel of bondholder litigation and monitoring. Additionally, we document that improvement in conservatism is more pronounced when foreign investors participate more and for firms with looser issuance criteria. We also find that enhanced conservatism results in a lower cost of debt for bonds in the liberalized market and those of the same issuers in the nonliberalized market, as well as lower overinvestments and fewer dividends. In addition, firms show greater conservatism in other forms of public disclosure. Together, these findings suggest that firms enhance accounting conservatism to facilitate foreign bond investors’ assessment of credit risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","volume":"52 1","pages":"403-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of bond market liberalization on accounting conservatism\",\"authors\":\"Renhui Fu, Fang Gao, Yanhui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbfa.12817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In a quasi-natural experimental setting in which Bond Connect allows foreign investors to trade in the Chinese interbank bond market, we predict and find that firms subject to the program increase their accounting conservatism. Further analyses suggest that the increase is concentrated among firms with higher litigation risk, more corporate site visits and greater media attention from overseas, suggesting that foreign bond investors affect firms through the channel of bondholder litigation and monitoring. Additionally, we document that improvement in conservatism is more pronounced when foreign investors participate more and for firms with looser issuance criteria. We also find that enhanced conservatism results in a lower cost of debt for bonds in the liberalized market and those of the same issuers in the nonliberalized market, as well as lower overinvestments and fewer dividends. In addition, firms show greater conservatism in other forms of public disclosure. Together, these findings suggest that firms enhance accounting conservatism to facilitate foreign bond investors’ assessment of credit risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"403-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12817\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of bond market liberalization on accounting conservatism
In a quasi-natural experimental setting in which Bond Connect allows foreign investors to trade in the Chinese interbank bond market, we predict and find that firms subject to the program increase their accounting conservatism. Further analyses suggest that the increase is concentrated among firms with higher litigation risk, more corporate site visits and greater media attention from overseas, suggesting that foreign bond investors affect firms through the channel of bondholder litigation and monitoring. Additionally, we document that improvement in conservatism is more pronounced when foreign investors participate more and for firms with looser issuance criteria. We also find that enhanced conservatism results in a lower cost of debt for bonds in the liberalized market and those of the same issuers in the nonliberalized market, as well as lower overinvestments and fewer dividends. In addition, firms show greater conservatism in other forms of public disclosure. Together, these findings suggest that firms enhance accounting conservatism to facilitate foreign bond investors’ assessment of credit risk.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting exists to publish high quality research papers in accounting, corporate finance, corporate governance and their interfaces. The interfaces are relevant in many areas such as financial reporting and communication, valuation, financial performance measurement and managerial reward and control structures. A feature of JBFA is that it recognises that informational problems are pervasive in financial markets and business organisations, and that accounting plays an important role in resolving such problems. JBFA welcomes both theoretical and empirical contributions. Nonetheless, theoretical papers should yield novel testable implications, and empirical papers should be theoretically well-motivated. The Editors view accounting and finance as being closely related to economics and, as a consequence, papers submitted will often have theoretical motivations that are grounded in economics. JBFA, however, also seeks papers that complement economics-based theorising with theoretical developments originating in other social science disciplines or traditions. While many papers in JBFA use econometric or related empirical methods, the Editors also welcome contributions that use other empirical research methods. Although the scope of JBFA is broad, it is not a suitable outlet for highly abstract mathematical papers, or empirical papers with inadequate theoretical motivation. Also, papers that study asset pricing, or the operations of financial markets, should have direct implications for one or more of preparers, regulators, users of financial statements, and corporate financial decision makers, or at least should have implications for the development of future research relevant to such users.