债券市场自由化对会计稳健性的影响

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Business Finance & Accounting Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/jbfa.12817
Renhui Fu, Fang Gao, Yanhui Wang
{"title":"债券市场自由化对会计稳健性的影响","authors":"Renhui Fu,&nbsp;Fang Gao,&nbsp;Yanhui Wang","doi":"10.1111/jbfa.12817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a quasi-natural experimental setting in which Bond Connect allows foreign investors to trade in the Chinese interbank bond market, we predict and find that firms subject to the program increase their accounting conservatism. Further analyses suggest that the increase is concentrated among firms with higher litigation risk, more corporate site visits and greater media attention from overseas, suggesting that foreign bond investors affect firms through the channel of bondholder litigation and monitoring. Additionally, we document that improvement in conservatism is more pronounced when foreign investors participate more and for firms with looser issuance criteria. We also find that enhanced conservatism results in a lower cost of debt for bonds in the liberalized market and those of the same issuers in the nonliberalized market, as well as lower overinvestments and fewer dividends. In addition, firms show greater conservatism in other forms of public disclosure. Together, these findings suggest that firms enhance accounting conservatism to facilitate foreign bond investors’ assessment of credit risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","volume":"52 1","pages":"403-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of bond market liberalization on accounting conservatism\",\"authors\":\"Renhui Fu,&nbsp;Fang Gao,&nbsp;Yanhui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbfa.12817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In a quasi-natural experimental setting in which Bond Connect allows foreign investors to trade in the Chinese interbank bond market, we predict and find that firms subject to the program increase their accounting conservatism. Further analyses suggest that the increase is concentrated among firms with higher litigation risk, more corporate site visits and greater media attention from overseas, suggesting that foreign bond investors affect firms through the channel of bondholder litigation and monitoring. Additionally, we document that improvement in conservatism is more pronounced when foreign investors participate more and for firms with looser issuance criteria. We also find that enhanced conservatism results in a lower cost of debt for bonds in the liberalized market and those of the same issuers in the nonliberalized market, as well as lower overinvestments and fewer dividends. In addition, firms show greater conservatism in other forms of public disclosure. Together, these findings suggest that firms enhance accounting conservatism to facilitate foreign bond investors’ assessment of credit risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"403-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12817\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个准自然的实验环境中,债券通允许外国投资者在中国银行间债券市场进行交易,我们预测并发现受该计划约束的公司增加了其会计稳健性。进一步分析表明,这一增长集中在诉讼风险较高、企业实地考察较多、海外媒体关注度较高的公司,表明外国债券投资者通过债券持有人诉讼和监督渠道影响公司。此外,我们证明,当外国投资者参与更多,对于发行标准较宽松的公司,保守性的改善更为明显。我们还发现,保守性增强导致自由化市场和非自由化市场中相同发行人的债券的债务成本更低,过度投资更低,股息更少。此外,公司在其他形式的公开披露中表现出更大的保守性。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,企业加强会计稳健性有助于外国债券投资者对信用风险的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of bond market liberalization on accounting conservatism

In a quasi-natural experimental setting in which Bond Connect allows foreign investors to trade in the Chinese interbank bond market, we predict and find that firms subject to the program increase their accounting conservatism. Further analyses suggest that the increase is concentrated among firms with higher litigation risk, more corporate site visits and greater media attention from overseas, suggesting that foreign bond investors affect firms through the channel of bondholder litigation and monitoring. Additionally, we document that improvement in conservatism is more pronounced when foreign investors participate more and for firms with looser issuance criteria. We also find that enhanced conservatism results in a lower cost of debt for bonds in the liberalized market and those of the same issuers in the nonliberalized market, as well as lower overinvestments and fewer dividends. In addition, firms show greater conservatism in other forms of public disclosure. Together, these findings suggest that firms enhance accounting conservatism to facilitate foreign bond investors’ assessment of credit risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Journal of Business Finance and Accounting exists to publish high quality research papers in accounting, corporate finance, corporate governance and their interfaces. The interfaces are relevant in many areas such as financial reporting and communication, valuation, financial performance measurement and managerial reward and control structures. A feature of JBFA is that it recognises that informational problems are pervasive in financial markets and business organisations, and that accounting plays an important role in resolving such problems. JBFA welcomes both theoretical and empirical contributions. Nonetheless, theoretical papers should yield novel testable implications, and empirical papers should be theoretically well-motivated. The Editors view accounting and finance as being closely related to economics and, as a consequence, papers submitted will often have theoretical motivations that are grounded in economics. JBFA, however, also seeks papers that complement economics-based theorising with theoretical developments originating in other social science disciplines or traditions. While many papers in JBFA use econometric or related empirical methods, the Editors also welcome contributions that use other empirical research methods. Although the scope of JBFA is broad, it is not a suitable outlet for highly abstract mathematical papers, or empirical papers with inadequate theoretical motivation. Also, papers that study asset pricing, or the operations of financial markets, should have direct implications for one or more of preparers, regulators, users of financial statements, and corporate financial decision makers, or at least should have implications for the development of future research relevant to such users.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Learn From Ties: The Effect of Board Interlocks on Asymmetric Cost Behavior A Positive Theory of Information for Debt Contracting: Implications for Financial Reporting The Information Content of Operational Effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1