布地奈德口服混悬液治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎的长期安全性和有效性:一项为期4年的3期开放标签研究

IF 16.2 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.024
Evan S. Dellon , David A. Katzka , Vincent A. Mukkada , Margaret H. Collins , Gary W. Falk , Camilla A. Richmond , Brian Terreri , Manoj Thakur , Mena Boules , Bridgett Goodwin , Ikuo Hirano
{"title":"布地奈德口服混悬液治疗嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎的长期安全性和有效性:一项为期4年的3期开放标签研究","authors":"Evan S. Dellon ,&nbsp;David A. Katzka ,&nbsp;Vincent A. Mukkada ,&nbsp;Margaret H. Collins ,&nbsp;Gary W. Falk ,&nbsp;Camilla A. Richmond ,&nbsp;Brian Terreri ,&nbsp;Manoj Thakur ,&nbsp;Mena Boules ,&nbsp;Bridgett Goodwin ,&nbsp;Ikuo Hirano","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div>We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study (SHP621-303) was a 4-year, phase 3, open-label study in patients with EoE who completed up to 52 weeks of BOS therapy in 2 preceding phase 3 studies. On the basis of treatment assignments in previous studies, patients were assigned to BOS–BOS or placebo–BOS groups. All patients received BOS 2.0 mg twice daily; dose reductions to once daily and interruptions were permitted. The safety and tolerability of BOS were primarily investigated, with exploratory efficacy endpoints also examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 131 patients were included. BOS was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 76.3% of patients; most were mild/moderate in severity and unrelated to study drug. The most frequently reported BOS-related TEAEs included abnormal adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test results (8.4%, 11/131; number of events [m] = 12) and adrenal insufficiency (2.3%, 3/131; m = 3). Esophageal candidiasis occurred in 3.1% of patients (4/131). The aforementioned TEAEs resolved in most patients. At month 48 of treatment, 50.0% and 58.3% of patients achieved/maintained a histologic response (≤6 and &lt;15 eosinophils per high-power field, respectively). The initial reduction (−3.6) in total EoE Endoscopic Reference Score from baseline to the first visit was maintained until month 48.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Long-term treatment with BOS was well-tolerated. Despite dosing changes/interruptions, approximately half of patients achieved/maintained a histologic response; initial improvements in endoscopic outcomes were maintained over 48 months. <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> number: NCT03245840.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"23 12","pages":"Pages 2155-2166.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":16.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A 4-Year, Phase 3, Open-Label Study\",\"authors\":\"Evan S. Dellon ,&nbsp;David A. Katzka ,&nbsp;Vincent A. Mukkada ,&nbsp;Margaret H. Collins ,&nbsp;Gary W. Falk ,&nbsp;Camilla A. Richmond ,&nbsp;Brian Terreri ,&nbsp;Manoj Thakur ,&nbsp;Mena Boules ,&nbsp;Bridgett Goodwin ,&nbsp;Ikuo Hirano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div>We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study (SHP621-303) was a 4-year, phase 3, open-label study in patients with EoE who completed up to 52 weeks of BOS therapy in 2 preceding phase 3 studies. On the basis of treatment assignments in previous studies, patients were assigned to BOS–BOS or placebo–BOS groups. All patients received BOS 2.0 mg twice daily; dose reductions to once daily and interruptions were permitted. The safety and tolerability of BOS were primarily investigated, with exploratory efficacy endpoints also examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 131 patients were included. BOS was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 76.3% of patients; most were mild/moderate in severity and unrelated to study drug. The most frequently reported BOS-related TEAEs included abnormal adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test results (8.4%, 11/131; number of events [m] = 12) and adrenal insufficiency (2.3%, 3/131; m = 3). Esophageal candidiasis occurred in 3.1% of patients (4/131). The aforementioned TEAEs resolved in most patients. At month 48 of treatment, 50.0% and 58.3% of patients achieved/maintained a histologic response (≤6 and &lt;15 eosinophils per high-power field, respectively). The initial reduction (−3.6) in total EoE Endoscopic Reference Score from baseline to the first visit was maintained until month 48.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Long-term treatment with BOS was well-tolerated. Despite dosing changes/interruptions, approximately half of patients achieved/maintained a histologic response; initial improvements in endoscopic outcomes were maintained over 48 months. <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> number: NCT03245840.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"23 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2155-2166.e5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356525001181\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356525001181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:研究布地奈德口服混悬液(BOS)治疗嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)的长期安全性和有效性。方法:这项研究(SHP621-303)是一项为期4年的3期开放标签研究,研究对象是在之前的两项3期研究中完成了长达52周BOS治疗的EoE患者。根据先前研究的治疗分配,患者被分配到BOS-BOS组或安慰剂- bos组。所有患者均接受BOS 2.0 mg,每日2次;剂量减少至每日一次,并允许中断。主要研究了BOS的安全性和耐受性,并考察了探索性疗效终点。结果:共纳入131例患者。BOS耐受性良好,未观察到意外的安全信号。76.3%的患者出现治疗不良事件(teae);大多数是轻/中度的严重程度,与研究药物无关。最常报道的bos相关teae包括促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验结果异常(8.4% [11/131];事件数[m] = 12)和肾上腺功能不全(2.3% [3/131];m = 3)。食道念珠菌病发生率为3.1%([4/131])。上述teae在大多数患者中消退。在治疗48个月时,50.0%和58.3%的患者达到/维持组织学反应(≤6)。结论:长期治疗BOS耐受性良好。尽管剂量改变/中断,大约一半的患者达到/维持了组织学反应;内镜结果的初步改善维持了48个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A 4-Year, Phase 3, Open-Label Study

Background & Aims

We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Methods

This study (SHP621-303) was a 4-year, phase 3, open-label study in patients with EoE who completed up to 52 weeks of BOS therapy in 2 preceding phase 3 studies. On the basis of treatment assignments in previous studies, patients were assigned to BOS–BOS or placebo–BOS groups. All patients received BOS 2.0 mg twice daily; dose reductions to once daily and interruptions were permitted. The safety and tolerability of BOS were primarily investigated, with exploratory efficacy endpoints also examined.

Results

Overall, 131 patients were included. BOS was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 76.3% of patients; most were mild/moderate in severity and unrelated to study drug. The most frequently reported BOS-related TEAEs included abnormal adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test results (8.4%, 11/131; number of events [m] = 12) and adrenal insufficiency (2.3%, 3/131; m = 3). Esophageal candidiasis occurred in 3.1% of patients (4/131). The aforementioned TEAEs resolved in most patients. At month 48 of treatment, 50.0% and 58.3% of patients achieved/maintained a histologic response (≤6 and <15 eosinophils per high-power field, respectively). The initial reduction (−3.6) in total EoE Endoscopic Reference Score from baseline to the first visit was maintained until month 48.

Conclusions

Long-term treatment with BOS was well-tolerated. Despite dosing changes/interruptions, approximately half of patients achieved/maintained a histologic response; initial improvements in endoscopic outcomes were maintained over 48 months. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03245840.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Time trends in strategies for postoperative Crohn's disease management and long-term surgical recurrence: ENEIDA registry data. Vibration-controlled transient elastography-based prevalence of MASLD in Saudi Arabia: A prospective cohort study. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Opportunities to Reduce Administrative Bloat in Gastroenterology Practices: Scoping Review. Longitudinal assessment of clinical risk scores for HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Studies in Gastroenterology: A CGH Editors' Viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1