IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.017
Anthony J Kanelidis, Leo Gozdecki, Mark N Belkin, Sara Kalantari, Ann Nguyen, Ben B Chung, Stanley Swat, Nitasha Sarswat, Gene Kim, Krystina Chickerillo, Justin Okray, Annalyse Hubbell, Shana K Creighton, Christine Y Jung, Indra Bole, Seyed Ehsan Saffari, Michael O'Connor, Takeyoshi Ota, Valluvan Jeevanandam, Christopher Salerno, Jonathan Grinstein
{"title":"Mitigating Post-operative Right Ventricular Dysfunction After Left Ventricular Assist Device: The RV Protection Study.","authors":"Anthony J Kanelidis, Leo Gozdecki, Mark N Belkin, Sara Kalantari, Ann Nguyen, Ben B Chung, Stanley Swat, Nitasha Sarswat, Gene Kim, Krystina Chickerillo, Justin Okray, Annalyse Hubbell, Shana K Creighton, Christine Y Jung, Indra Bole, Seyed Ehsan Saffari, Michael O'Connor, Takeyoshi Ota, Valluvan Jeevanandam, Christopher Salerno, Jonathan Grinstein","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite improvements in hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD), hemodynamic-related events (HDREs), such as right ventricular failure (RVF) and aortic insufficiency, still result in considerable morbidity and mortality. We investigated a comprehensive, upfront RV protection strategy combining hemodynamic, ventilatory and pharmaceutical optimization to mitigate the risk of RVF.</p><p><strong>Methods/results: </strong>Participants were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either the RV-protection strategy or usual care for post-operative LVAD management. The RV-protection strategy targeted RV afterload (inhaled NO ≥ 48 hrs, PCWP < 18), RV preload (CVP 8-14), RV perfusion (MAP 70-90, Hgb > 8), RV contractility (IV inotropes), rate/rhythm control (HR >100, normal sinus), ventilatory management (SpO2 >95, PaCO<sup>2</sup> < 50, plateau pressure < 30, PEEP ≤ 5), and RV geometry (echo-guided septal position). The primary outcome was survival free from any HDREs or HRAEs at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included severe RVF, according to INTERMACS and ARC definitions. Twenty participants were randomized: 10 to the RV-protection strategy and 10 to usual care. The median age was 60 years (IQR 54-69), 50% were Black, and 50% had ischemia. At 24 weeks, the RV-protection strategy showed significantly greater survival rates free from HDREs or HRAEs compared to usual care (80% vs 40%; P = 0.04). Event-free survival for HRAEs resulted in similar findings. No HDREs occurred with the RV protection strategy vs 3 (30%) with usual care (P = 0.067). Similarly, severe RVF according to INTERMACS or ARC did not occur in the RV protection strategy vs 3 (30%) in the usual-care cohort (P = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants receiving a novel, comprehensive, upfront RV protection strategy post-LVAD implantation had significantly greater survival rates free from HDREs or HRAEs at 24 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管 HeartMate 3 左心室辅助装置(LVAD)在血液相容性相关不良事件(HRAEs)方面有所改善,但右心室衰竭(RVF)和主动脉瓣关闭不全等血液动力学相关事件(HDREs)仍会导致相当高的发病率和死亡率。我们研究了一种结合血流动力学、通气和药物优化的综合前期 RV 保护策略,以降低 RVF 风险:参与者以 1:1 的方式被随机分配到 RV 保护策略或术后 LVAD 管理的常规护理中。RV保护策略针对RV后负荷(吸入NO≥48小时,PCWP 8)、RV收缩力(静脉注射肌注)、心率/节律控制(HR>100,正常窦性)、通气管理(SpO2>95,PaCO2>10)、RVF管理(SpO2>10,PaCO2>10):在植入 LVAD 后接受新颖、全面的前期 RV 保护策略的参试者在 24 周后无 HDRE 或 HRAE 的存活率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mitigating Post-operative Right Ventricular Dysfunction After Left Ventricular Assist Device: The RV Protection Study.

Background: Despite improvements in hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD), hemodynamic-related events (HDREs), such as right ventricular failure (RVF) and aortic insufficiency, still result in considerable morbidity and mortality. We investigated a comprehensive, upfront RV protection strategy combining hemodynamic, ventilatory and pharmaceutical optimization to mitigate the risk of RVF.

Methods/results: Participants were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either the RV-protection strategy or usual care for post-operative LVAD management. The RV-protection strategy targeted RV afterload (inhaled NO ≥ 48 hrs, PCWP < 18), RV preload (CVP 8-14), RV perfusion (MAP 70-90, Hgb > 8), RV contractility (IV inotropes), rate/rhythm control (HR >100, normal sinus), ventilatory management (SpO2 >95, PaCO2 < 50, plateau pressure < 30, PEEP ≤ 5), and RV geometry (echo-guided septal position). The primary outcome was survival free from any HDREs or HRAEs at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included severe RVF, according to INTERMACS and ARC definitions. Twenty participants were randomized: 10 to the RV-protection strategy and 10 to usual care. The median age was 60 years (IQR 54-69), 50% were Black, and 50% had ischemia. At 24 weeks, the RV-protection strategy showed significantly greater survival rates free from HDREs or HRAEs compared to usual care (80% vs 40%; P = 0.04). Event-free survival for HRAEs resulted in similar findings. No HDREs occurred with the RV protection strategy vs 3 (30%) with usual care (P = 0.067). Similarly, severe RVF according to INTERMACS or ARC did not occur in the RV protection strategy vs 3 (30%) in the usual-care cohort (P = 0.20).

Conclusions: Participants receiving a novel, comprehensive, upfront RV protection strategy post-LVAD implantation had significantly greater survival rates free from HDREs or HRAEs at 24 weeks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices. Patient Focus: Teamwork to make the heart work: An explanation of "Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices''. Activation of neutrophil extracellular trap formation in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Weighing the Benefits of Wearable Devices in Heart Failure Trials. Lessons Learned From 2 Research Studies Enrolling Underrepresented Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices and Their Family Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1