基于移动健康的心理弹性干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者心理弹性、负面情绪和自我效能的影响

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101357
Qianyu Zhang, Liping Wang, Jinghan Yang, Weichao Liu, Chengang Hong
{"title":"基于移动健康的心理弹性干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者心理弹性、负面情绪和自我效能的影响","authors":"Qianyu Zhang,&nbsp;Liping Wang,&nbsp;Jinghan Yang,&nbsp;Weichao Liu,&nbsp;Chengang Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mental health problems are particularly acute in patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Traditional offline psychological interventions not only cause patients to feel fatigued from travelling, but also increase the risk of group aggregation of infections. The application of mobile healthcare provides great convenience for patients. However, most of the existing online psychological intervention studies have not focused on the phenomenon of limitation of their limb movement due to postoperative incision and PICC problems. Therefore, this study will combine the consideration of these characteristics to investigate the effectiveness of a 3-month online psychological resilience intervention in improving negative emotions and increasing the level of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an experimental research design, 70 breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy were recruited from two breast surgery wards of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province in June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: ① patients older than 18 years old; ② patients with a pathological diagnosis of breast cancer during postoperative chemotherapy; ③ patients with the ability to read and write in Chinese; ④ patients or their family members owning a smartphone; and ⑤ patients who voluntarily participated in this study. Exclusion criteria: (1) those who do not know the condition; (2) those with physical dysfunction; (3) those with previous history of psychological disorders and psychiatric illnesses; (4) those with understanding and communication disorders. Grouped by ward, patients in the control group received routine discharge care and follow-up, and patients in the intervention group used the psychological resilience applet on the basis of the control group. The sample size was calculated using Gpower 3.1 software, and the total sample size for both groups was finally determined to be 70 cases, taking into account the 10%-20% loss of follow-up rate. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.0.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Sixty-six patients completed the study, 34 in the intervention group and 32 in the control group. One case withdrew from the intervention group and three cases were lost in the control group at T1. Before the intervention (T0) there was no statistically significant difference between the total psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores and the scores of each dimension between the two groups of patients (P&gt;0.05). After the intervention (T1), the differences in psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores, and scores on all dimensions (except for the resilience and strength dimensions of psychological resilience) between the two groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study provides evidence that mHealth-based psychological resilience interventions show significant benefits in terms of increasing patients' levels of psychological resilience, reducing levels of anxiety and depression, and increasing levels of self-efficacy. Future research should further explore how to optimise interaction during the intervention to maintain patient engagement without causing fatigue.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>No.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101357"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of an mHealth-based psychological resilience intervention on psychological resilience, negative emotions and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Qianyu Zhang,&nbsp;Liping Wang,&nbsp;Jinghan Yang,&nbsp;Weichao Liu,&nbsp;Chengang Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mental health problems are particularly acute in patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Traditional offline psychological interventions not only cause patients to feel fatigued from travelling, but also increase the risk of group aggregation of infections. The application of mobile healthcare provides great convenience for patients. However, most of the existing online psychological intervention studies have not focused on the phenomenon of limitation of their limb movement due to postoperative incision and PICC problems. Therefore, this study will combine the consideration of these characteristics to investigate the effectiveness of a 3-month online psychological resilience intervention in improving negative emotions and increasing the level of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an experimental research design, 70 breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy were recruited from two breast surgery wards of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province in June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: ① patients older than 18 years old; ② patients with a pathological diagnosis of breast cancer during postoperative chemotherapy; ③ patients with the ability to read and write in Chinese; ④ patients or their family members owning a smartphone; and ⑤ patients who voluntarily participated in this study. Exclusion criteria: (1) those who do not know the condition; (2) those with physical dysfunction; (3) those with previous history of psychological disorders and psychiatric illnesses; (4) those with understanding and communication disorders. Grouped by ward, patients in the control group received routine discharge care and follow-up, and patients in the intervention group used the psychological resilience applet on the basis of the control group. The sample size was calculated using Gpower 3.1 software, and the total sample size for both groups was finally determined to be 70 cases, taking into account the 10%-20% loss of follow-up rate. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.0.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Sixty-six patients completed the study, 34 in the intervention group and 32 in the control group. One case withdrew from the intervention group and three cases were lost in the control group at T1. Before the intervention (T0) there was no statistically significant difference between the total psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores and the scores of each dimension between the two groups of patients (P&gt;0.05). After the intervention (T1), the differences in psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores, and scores on all dimensions (except for the resilience and strength dimensions of psychological resilience) between the two groups were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study provides evidence that mHealth-based psychological resilience interventions show significant benefits in terms of increasing patients' levels of psychological resilience, reducing levels of anxiety and depression, and increasing levels of self-efficacy. Future research should further explore how to optimise interaction during the intervention to maintain patient engagement without causing fatigue.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>No.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003511\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524003511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受乳腺癌术后化疗的患者中,心理健康问题尤其严重。传统的线下心理干预不仅会使患者因旅行而感到疲劳,还会增加群体聚集感染的风险。移动医疗的应用为患者提供了极大的便利。然而,现有的网上心理干预研究大多没有关注术后切口和PICC问题导致肢体活动受限的现象。因此,本研究将结合这些特点,探讨为期3个月的在线心理弹性干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者负面情绪改善和心理弹性水平提高的效果。方法采用实验研究设计,于2022年6月在浙江省某三级医院乳腺外科两个病房招募70例乳腺癌术后化疗患者。纳入标准:①年龄大于18岁;②病理诊断为乳腺癌的患者术后化疗;③具有中文读写能力的患者;④患者或其家属拥有智能手机;⑤自愿参加本研究的患者。排除标准:(1)不了解病情者;(二)有身体功能障碍的;(三)有心理障碍、精神疾病史的;(4)有理解和沟通障碍者。按病区分组,对照组患者接受常规出院护理及随访,干预组患者在对照组基础上使用心理弹性小程序。使用Gpower 3.1软件计算样本量,考虑到随访率损失10%-20%,最终确定两组总样本量为70例。数据采用SPSS 26.0进行分析。66名患者完成了研究,干预组34名,对照组32名。T1时干预组1例退出,对照组3例丢失。干预前(T0)两组患者的总心理弹性、焦虑抑郁、自我效能得分及各维度得分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后(T1),两组在心理弹性、焦虑抑郁、自我效能得分、各维度得分(除心理弹性和力量维度外)差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。本研究提供的证据表明,基于移动健康的心理弹性干预在提高患者的心理弹性水平、减少焦虑和抑郁水平以及提高自我效能水平方面显示出显著的益处。未来的研究应进一步探索如何在干预过程中优化互动,以保持患者参与而不引起疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of an mHealth-based psychological resilience intervention on psychological resilience, negative emotions and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy

Background

Mental health problems are particularly acute in patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Traditional offline psychological interventions not only cause patients to feel fatigued from travelling, but also increase the risk of group aggregation of infections. The application of mobile healthcare provides great convenience for patients. However, most of the existing online psychological intervention studies have not focused on the phenomenon of limitation of their limb movement due to postoperative incision and PICC problems. Therefore, this study will combine the consideration of these characteristics to investigate the effectiveness of a 3-month online psychological resilience intervention in improving negative emotions and increasing the level of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy.

Methods

Using an experimental research design, 70 breast cancer patients during postoperative chemotherapy were recruited from two breast surgery wards of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province in June 2022. Inclusion criteria were: ① patients older than 18 years old; ② patients with a pathological diagnosis of breast cancer during postoperative chemotherapy; ③ patients with the ability to read and write in Chinese; ④ patients or their family members owning a smartphone; and ⑤ patients who voluntarily participated in this study. Exclusion criteria: (1) those who do not know the condition; (2) those with physical dysfunction; (3) those with previous history of psychological disorders and psychiatric illnesses; (4) those with understanding and communication disorders. Grouped by ward, patients in the control group received routine discharge care and follow-up, and patients in the intervention group used the psychological resilience applet on the basis of the control group. The sample size was calculated using Gpower 3.1 software, and the total sample size for both groups was finally determined to be 70 cases, taking into account the 10%-20% loss of follow-up rate. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.0.

Findings

Sixty-six patients completed the study, 34 in the intervention group and 32 in the control group. One case withdrew from the intervention group and three cases were lost in the control group at T1. Before the intervention (T0) there was no statistically significant difference between the total psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores and the scores of each dimension between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). After the intervention (T1), the differences in psychological resilience, anxiety and depression, self-efficacy scores, and scores on all dimensions (except for the resilience and strength dimensions of psychological resilience) between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.05).

Interpretation

This study provides evidence that mHealth-based psychological resilience interventions show significant benefits in terms of increasing patients' levels of psychological resilience, reducing levels of anxiety and depression, and increasing levels of self-efficacy. Future research should further explore how to optimise interaction during the intervention to maintain patient engagement without causing fatigue.

Funding

No.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a comprehensive package based on combined C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections at village clinics in China: a cluster randomised controlled trial Stage shifts in national lung adenocarcinoma and the impact of opportunistic self-initiated LDCT screening in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study A comprehensive overview of paracetamol poisoning admissions and long-term outcomes in New South Wales, Australia: a retrospective linked data cohort (PAVLOVA-3) Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of invasive group A streptococcal infection in the Republic of Korea, 2015–2024: a nationwide multicenter study A clinician-centric intelligent method towards reliable pancreatic cancer vascular invasion assessment: a retrospective, multi-centre study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1