IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S490442
Ana M Peiró, Jordi Barrachina, Mónica Escorial, Isidro Aguado, César Margarit, Anna Grimby-Ekman
{"title":"Using a Two-Steps Clustering and PCA Analysis for Stratified Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Care: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ana M Peiró, Jordi Barrachina, Mónica Escorial, Isidro Aguado, César Margarit, Anna Grimby-Ekman","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S490442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the number of people who suffer from chronic pain and the impact on healthcare resources, it is imperative that the people with pain receive an appropriate matched treatment due and stratified care. The aim of this study was to characterize chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients' states, through an unsupervised cluster analysis, to implement clinical recommendations in pain care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Real-world ambulatory CNCP cohort of patients (n = 418) completed a multidimensional patient-reported registry, as part of a routine initial evaluation, in a multidisciplinary academic pain unit. A clustering analysis was performed according to: 1) pain intensity and relief; 2) quality of life; 3) number of adverse events; and 4) emergency department visits. A retrospective study was developed (n = 120) following the stratified analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a principal component analysis, cut-off points were defined to discriminate between the six clusters and three groups of different pain intervention requirements. Those patients showed a significantly different monitoring and basal clinical status. Being older than 65 years old, retired or on medical leave, under opioids and anxiolytic prescription, had a severe impact on daily quality of life without any sex-difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These clusters based on real-world clinical information might be useful for screening even more where the access to physical exploration is limited. Follow-up analyses will support the replicability of this stratified care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"673-684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S490442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到慢性疼痛患者的人数和对医疗资源的影响,当务之急是为疼痛患者提供适当的匹配治疗和分层护理。本研究旨在通过无监督聚类分析,描述慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)患者的状态特征,以落实疼痛护理的临床建议:真实世界中的非卧床 CNCP 患者队列(n = 418)完成了多维度患者报告登记,作为多学科学术疼痛科室常规初步评估的一部分。根据以下因素进行了聚类分析:1)疼痛强度和缓解程度;2)生活质量;3)不良事件数量;4)急诊就诊情况。根据分层分析结果,开展了一项回顾性研究(n = 120):通过主成分分析,确定了区分六个群组和三组不同疼痛干预要求的临界点。这些患者的监测和基本临床状态明显不同。65岁以上、退休或休病假、服用阿片类药物和抗焦虑药的患者对日常生活质量有严重影响,且无性别差异:这些基于真实世界临床信息的分组可能有助于筛查更多身体检查机会有限的人群。后续分析将支持这种分层护理的可复制性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using a Two-Steps Clustering and PCA Analysis for Stratified Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Care: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: Given the number of people who suffer from chronic pain and the impact on healthcare resources, it is imperative that the people with pain receive an appropriate matched treatment due and stratified care. The aim of this study was to characterize chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients' states, through an unsupervised cluster analysis, to implement clinical recommendations in pain care.

Patients and methods: Real-world ambulatory CNCP cohort of patients (n = 418) completed a multidimensional patient-reported registry, as part of a routine initial evaluation, in a multidisciplinary academic pain unit. A clustering analysis was performed according to: 1) pain intensity and relief; 2) quality of life; 3) number of adverse events; and 4) emergency department visits. A retrospective study was developed (n = 120) following the stratified analysis.

Results: From a principal component analysis, cut-off points were defined to discriminate between the six clusters and three groups of different pain intervention requirements. Those patients showed a significantly different monitoring and basal clinical status. Being older than 65 years old, retired or on medical leave, under opioids and anxiolytic prescription, had a severe impact on daily quality of life without any sex-difference.

Conclusion: These clusters based on real-world clinical information might be useful for screening even more where the access to physical exploration is limited. Follow-up analyses will support the replicability of this stratified care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Telehealth is Crucial for Pain Medicine: Patients and Doctors are at the Brink, and Medicare Must Act Now. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study. Biases in Artificial Intelligence Application in Pain Medicine. Efficacy of Selective Nerve Root Block for Different Types of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind, Prospective Cohort Study. Efficacy and Safety of Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1